discourse/spec/lib/concern/second_factor_manager_spec.rb

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

510 lines
17 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
RSpec.describe SecondFactorManager do
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
fab!(:user) { Fabricate(:user) }
fab!(:user_second_factor_totp) { Fabricate(:user_second_factor_totp, user: user) }
fab!(:user_security_key) do
Fabricate(
:user_security_key,
user: user,
public_key: valid_security_key_data[:public_key],
credential_id: valid_security_key_data[:credential_id],
)
end
fab!(:another_user) { Fabricate(:user) }
fab!(:user_second_factor_backup) { Fabricate(:user_second_factor_backup) }
2018-06-28 16:12:32 +08:00
let(:user_backup) { user_second_factor_backup.user }
describe "#totp" do
it "should return the right data" do
totp = nil
expect do totp = another_user.create_totp(enabled: true) end.to change {
UserSecondFactor.count
}.by(1)
expect(totp.totp_object.issuer).to eq(SiteSetting.title)
expect(totp.totp_object.secret).to eq(
another_user.reload.user_second_factors.totps.first.data,
)
end
end
describe "#create_totp" do
it "should create the right record" do
second_factor = another_user.create_totp(enabled: true)
expect(second_factor.method).to eq(UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp])
expect(second_factor.data).to be_present
expect(second_factor.enabled).to eq(true)
end
end
describe "#totp_provisioning_uri" do
it "should return the right uri" do
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_provisioning_uri).to eq(
"otpauth://totp/#{SiteSetting.title}:#{ERB::Util.url_encode(user.email)}?secret=#{user_second_factor_totp.data}&issuer=#{SiteSetting.title}",
)
end
it "should handle a colon in the site title" do
SiteSetting.title = "Spaceballs: The Discourse"
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_provisioning_uri).to eq(
"otpauth://totp/Spaceballs%20The%20Discourse:#{ERB::Util.url_encode(user.email)}?secret=#{user_second_factor_totp.data}&issuer=Spaceballs%20The%20Discourse",
)
end
it "should handle a two words before a colon in the title" do
SiteSetting.title = "Our Spaceballs: The Discourse"
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_provisioning_uri).to eq(
"otpauth://totp/Our%20Spaceballs%20The%20Discourse:#{ERB::Util.url_encode(user.email)}?secret=#{user_second_factor_totp.data}&issuer=Our%20Spaceballs%20The%20Discourse",
)
end
end
describe "#authenticate_totp" do
it "should be able to authenticate a token" do
freeze_time do
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.last_used).to eq(nil)
token = user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_object.now
expect(user.authenticate_totp(token)).to eq(true)
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.last_used).to eq_time(Time.zone.now)
expect(user.authenticate_totp(token)).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when token is blank" do
it "should be false" do
expect(user.authenticate_totp(nil)).to eq(false)
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.last_used).to eq(nil)
end
end
describe "when token is invalid" do
it "should be false" do
expect(user.authenticate_totp("111111")).to eq(false)
expect(user.user_second_factors.totps.first.last_used).to eq(nil)
end
end
end
describe "#totp_enabled?" do
describe "when user does not have a second factor record" do
it "should return false" do
expect(another_user.totp_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when user's second factor record is disabled" do
it "should return false" do
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
disable_totp
expect(user.totp_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when user's second factor record is enabled" do
it "should return true" do
expect(user.totp_enabled?).to eq(true)
end
end
describe "when SSO is enabled" do
it "should return false" do
FEATURE: Rename 'Discourse SSO' to DiscourseConnect (#11978) The 'Discourse SSO' protocol is being rebranded to DiscourseConnect. This should help to reduce confusion when 'SSO' is used in the generic sense. This commit aims to: - Rename `sso_` site settings. DiscourseConnect specific ones are prefixed `discourse_connect_`. Generic settings are prefixed `auth_` - Add (server-side-only) backwards compatibility for the old setting names, with deprecation notices - Copy `site_settings` database records to the new names - Rename relevant translation keys - Update relevant translations This commit does **not** aim to: - Rename any Ruby classes or methods. This might be done in a future commit - Change any URLs. This would break existing integrations - Make any changes to the protocol. This would break existing integrations - Change any functionality. Further normalization across DiscourseConnect and other auth methods will be done separately The risks are: - There is no backwards compatibility for site settings on the client-side. Accessing auth-related site settings in Javascript is fairly rare, and an error on the client side would not be security-critical. - If a plugin is monkey-patching parts of the auth process, changes to locale keys could cause broken error messages. This should also be unlikely. The old site setting names remain functional, so security-related overrides will remain working. A follow-up commit will be made with a post-deploy migration to delete the old `site_settings` rows.
2021-02-08 18:04:33 +08:00
SiteSetting.discourse_connect_url = "http://someurl.com"
SiteSetting.enable_discourse_connect = true
expect(user.totp_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when local login is disabled" do
it "should return false" do
SiteSetting.enable_local_logins = false
expect(user.totp_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
end
2018-06-28 16:12:32 +08:00
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
describe "#has_multiple_second_factor_methods?" do
context "when security keys and totp are enabled" do
it "returns true" do
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
expect(user.has_multiple_second_factor_methods?).to eq(true)
end
end
context "if the totp gets disabled" do
it "returns false" do
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
disable_totp
expect(user.has_multiple_second_factor_methods?).to eq(false)
end
end
context "if the security key gets disabled" do
it "returns false" do
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
disable_security_key
expect(user.has_multiple_second_factor_methods?).to eq(false)
end
end
end
describe "#only_security_keys_enabled?" do
it "returns true if totp disabled and security key enabled" do
disable_totp
expect(user.only_security_keys_enabled?).to eq(true)
end
end
describe "#only_totp_or_backup_codes_enabled?" do
it "returns true if totp enabled and security key disabled" do
disable_security_key
expect(user.only_totp_or_backup_codes_enabled?).to eq(true)
end
end
describe "#authenticate_second_factor" do
let(:params) { {} }
let(:secure_session) { {} }
context "when neither security keys nor totp/backup codes are enabled" do
before { disable_security_key && disable_totp }
it "returns OK, because it doesn't need to authenticate" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "keeps used_2fa_method nil because no authentication is done" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
context "when only security key is enabled" do
before do
disable_totp
simulate_localhost_webauthn_challenge
Webauthn.stage_challenge(user, secure_session)
end
context "when security key params are valid" do
let(:params) do
{
second_factor_token: valid_security_key_auth_post_data,
second_factor_method: UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key],
}
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
it "returns OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to security keys" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
context "when security key params are invalid" do
let(:params) do
{
second_factor_token: {
signature: "bad",
clientData: "bad",
authenticatorData: "bad",
credentialId: "bad",
},
second_factor_method: UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key],
}
end
it "returns not OK" do
result = user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session)
expect(result.ok).to eq(false)
expect(result.error).to eq(I18n.t("webauthn.validation.not_found_error"))
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
expect(result.used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
end
context "when only totp is enabled" do
before { disable_security_key }
context "when totp is valid" do
let(:params) do
{
second_factor_token: user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_object.now,
second_factor_method: UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp],
}
end
it "returns OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to totp" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
context "when totp is invalid" do
let(:params) do
{ second_factor_token: "blah", second_factor_method: UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp] }
end
it "returns not OK" do
result = user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session)
expect(result.ok).to eq(false)
expect(result.error).to eq(I18n.t("login.invalid_second_factor_code"))
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
expect(result.used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
end
context "when both security keys and totp are enabled" do
let(:invalid_method) { 4 }
let(:method) { invalid_method }
before do
simulate_localhost_webauthn_challenge
Webauthn.stage_challenge(user, secure_session)
end
context "when method selected is invalid" do
it "returns an error" do
result = user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session)
expect(result.ok).to eq(false)
expect(result.error).to eq(I18n.t("login.invalid_second_factor_method"))
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
expect(result.used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
context "when method selected is TOTP" do
let(:method) { UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp] }
let(:token) { user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_object.now }
context "when totp params are provided" do
let(:params) { { second_factor_token: token, second_factor_method: method } }
it "validates totp OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to totp" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
context "when the user does not have TOTP enabled" do
let(:token) { "test" }
before { user.totps.destroy_all }
it "returns an error" do
result = user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session)
expect(result.ok).to eq(false)
expect(result.error).to eq(I18n.t("login.not_enabled_second_factor_method"))
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
expect(result.used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
end
end
context "when method selected is Security Keys" do
let(:method) { UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key] }
before do
simulate_localhost_webauthn_challenge
Webauthn.stage_challenge(user, secure_session)
end
context "when security key params are valid" do
let(:params) do
{ second_factor_token: valid_security_key_auth_post_data, second_factor_method: method }
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
it "returns OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to security keys" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
context "when the user does not have security keys enabled" do
before { user.security_keys.destroy_all }
it "returns an error" do
result = user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session)
expect(result.ok).to eq(false)
expect(result.error).to eq(I18n.t("login.not_enabled_second_factor_method"))
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
expect(result.used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
end
end
context "when method selected is Backup Codes" do
let(:method) { UserSecondFactor.methods[:backup_codes] }
let!(:backup_code) { Fabricate(:user_second_factor_backup, user: user) }
context "when backup code params are provided" do
let(:params) do
{ second_factor_token: "iAmValidBackupCode", second_factor_method: method }
end
context "when backup codes enabled" do
it "validates codes OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to backup codes" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:backup_codes],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
context "when backup codes disabled" do
before { user.user_second_factors.backup_codes.destroy_all }
it "returns an error" do
result = user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session)
expect(result.ok).to eq(false)
expect(result.error).to eq(I18n.t("login.not_enabled_second_factor_method"))
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
expect(result.used_2fa_method).to eq(nil)
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
end
end
context "when no totp params are provided" do
let(:params) do
{
second_factor_token: valid_security_key_auth_post_data,
second_factor_method: UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key],
}
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
it "validates the security key OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to security keys" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:security_key],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
context "when totp params are provided" do
let(:params) do
{
second_factor_token: user.user_second_factors.totps.first.totp_object.now,
second_factor_method: UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp],
}
end
it "validates totp OK" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).ok).to eq(true)
end
FEATURE: Add 2FA support to the Discourse Connect Provider protocol (#16386) Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider. The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA, it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish. To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse. When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their 2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will contain `no_2fa_methods=true`. You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse. This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that you've redirected to Discourse. Internal ticket: t62183.
2022-04-13 20:04:09 +08:00
it "sets used_2fa_method to totp" do
expect(user.authenticate_second_factor(params, secure_session).used_2fa_method).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:totp],
)
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
end
end
end
describe "backup codes" do
2018-06-28 16:12:32 +08:00
describe "#generate_backup_codes" do
it "should generate and store 10 backup codes" do
backup_codes = user.generate_backup_codes
expect(backup_codes.length).to be 10
expect(user_backup.user_second_factors.backup_codes).to be_present
expect(user_backup.user_second_factors.backup_codes.pluck(:method).uniq[0]).to eq(
UserSecondFactor.methods[:backup_codes],
)
expect(user_backup.user_second_factors.backup_codes.pluck(:enabled).uniq[0]).to eq(true)
end
end
describe "#create_backup_codes" do
it "should create 10 backup code records" do
raw_codes = Array.new(10) { SecureRandom.hex(8) }
backup_codes = another_user.create_backup_codes(raw_codes)
expect(another_user.user_second_factors.backup_codes.length).to be 10
end
end
describe "#authenticate_backup_code" do
it "should be able to authenticate a backup code" do
backup_code = "iAmValidBackupCode"
expect(user_backup.authenticate_backup_code(backup_code)).to eq(true)
expect(user_backup.authenticate_backup_code(backup_code)).to eq(false)
end
describe "when code is blank" do
it "should be false" do
expect(user_backup.authenticate_backup_code(nil)).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when code is invalid" do
it "should be false" do
expect(user_backup.authenticate_backup_code("notValidBackupCode")).to eq(false)
end
end
end
describe "#backup_codes_enabled?" do
describe "when user does not have a second factor backup enabled" do
it "should return false" do
expect(another_user.backup_codes_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when user's second factor backup codes have been used" do
it "should return false" do
user_backup.user_second_factors.backup_codes.update_all(enabled: false)
expect(user_backup.backup_codes_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when user's second factor code is available" do
it "should return true" do
expect(user_backup.backup_codes_enabled?).to eq(true)
end
end
describe "when SSO is enabled" do
it "should return false" do
FEATURE: Rename 'Discourse SSO' to DiscourseConnect (#11978) The 'Discourse SSO' protocol is being rebranded to DiscourseConnect. This should help to reduce confusion when 'SSO' is used in the generic sense. This commit aims to: - Rename `sso_` site settings. DiscourseConnect specific ones are prefixed `discourse_connect_`. Generic settings are prefixed `auth_` - Add (server-side-only) backwards compatibility for the old setting names, with deprecation notices - Copy `site_settings` database records to the new names - Rename relevant translation keys - Update relevant translations This commit does **not** aim to: - Rename any Ruby classes or methods. This might be done in a future commit - Change any URLs. This would break existing integrations - Make any changes to the protocol. This would break existing integrations - Change any functionality. Further normalization across DiscourseConnect and other auth methods will be done separately The risks are: - There is no backwards compatibility for site settings on the client-side. Accessing auth-related site settings in Javascript is fairly rare, and an error on the client side would not be security-critical. - If a plugin is monkey-patching parts of the auth process, changes to locale keys could cause broken error messages. This should also be unlikely. The old site setting names remain functional, so security-related overrides will remain working. A follow-up commit will be made with a post-deploy migration to delete the old `site_settings` rows.
2021-02-08 18:04:33 +08:00
SiteSetting.discourse_connect_url = "http://someurl.com"
SiteSetting.enable_discourse_connect = true
2018-06-28 16:12:32 +08:00
expect(user_backup.backup_codes_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
describe "when local login is disabled" do
it "should return false" do
SiteSetting.enable_local_logins = false
expect(user_backup.backup_codes_enabled?).to eq(false)
end
end
end
end
2020-01-15 18:27:12 +08:00
def disable_totp
user.user_second_factors.totps.first.update!(enabled: false)
end
def disable_security_key
user.security_keys.first.destroy!
end
end