discourse/docs/SECURITY.md

Failed to ignore revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs.

57 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2013-07-31 04:59:30 +08:00
## Discourse Security
2013-07-31 04:57:15 +08:00
2013-08-08 01:25:05 +08:00
We take security very seriously at Discourse. We welcome any peer review of our 100% open source code to ensure nobody's Discourse forum is ever compromised or hacked.
2013-07-31 04:57:15 +08:00
2013-07-31 05:00:37 +08:00
### Where should I report security issues?
2017-01-07 15:51:12 +08:00
In order to give the community time to respond and upgrade we strongly urge you report all security issues privately. Please use our [vulnerability disclosure program at Hacker One](https://hackerone.com/discourse) to provide details and repro steps and we will respond ASAP. If you prefer not to use Hacker One, email us directly at `team@discourse.org` with details and repro steps. Security issues *always* take precedence over bug fixes and feature work. We can and do mark releases as "urgent" if they contain serious security fixes.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
For a list of recent security commits, check [our GitHub commits prefixed with SECURITY](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/search?o=desc&q=SECURITY&s=committer-date&type=Commits).
2018-09-12 03:43:52 +08:00
2013-07-31 04:59:30 +08:00
### Password Storage
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2019-02-22 23:29:27 +08:00
Discourse uses the PBKDF2 algorithm to encrypt salted passwords. This algorithm is blessed by NIST. Security experts on the web [tend to agree that PBKDF2 is a secure choice](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/4781/do-any-security-experts-recommend-bcrypt-for-password-storage).
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
**options you can customise in your production.rb file**
2013-08-08 01:25:05 +08:00
- `pbkdf2_algorithm`: the hashing algorithm used (default "sha256")
2013-07-31 04:57:15 +08:00
- `pbkdf2_iterations`: the number of iterations to run (default 64000)
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
### XSS
2013-07-31 05:08:15 +08:00
The main vector for [XSS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting) attacks is via the post composer, as we allow users to enter Markdown, HTML (a safe subset thereof), and BBCode to format posts.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2018-12-20 08:55:54 +08:00
There are 3 main scenarios we protect against:
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2013-07-31 05:08:15 +08:00
1. **Markdown preview invokes an XSS.** This is possibly severe in one specific case: when a forum staff member edits a user's post, seeing the raw markup, where a malicious user may have inserted code to run JavaScript. This code would only show up in the preview, but it would run in the context of a forum staff member, which is *very* bad.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2013-07-31 05:08:15 +08:00
2. **Markdown displayed on the page invokes an XSS.** To protect against client side preview XSS, Discourse uses [Google Caja](https://developers.google.com/caja/) in the preview window.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2018-12-20 08:55:54 +08:00
3. **CSP is on by default** for [all Discourse installations](https://meta.discourse.org/t/mitigate-xss-attacks-with-content-security-policy/104243) as of Discourse 2.2. It can be switched off in the site settings, but it is default on.
2018-12-20 08:54:45 +08:00
2013-08-08 01:25:05 +08:00
On the server side we run a whitelist based sanitizer, implemented using the [Sanitize gem](https://github.com/rgrove/sanitize). See the [relevant Discourse code](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/lib/pretty_text.rb).
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2013-07-31 04:57:15 +08:00
In addition, titles and all other places where non-admins can enter code are protected either using the Handlebars library or standard Rails XSS protection.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
### CSRF
2019-02-22 23:29:27 +08:00
[CSRF](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_request_forgery) allows malicious sites to perform HTTP requests in the context of a forum user without their knowledge -- mostly by getting users who already hold a valid forum login cookie to click a specific link in their web browser.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2013-07-31 04:59:30 +08:00
Discourse extends the built-in Rails CSRF protection in the following ways:
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
1. By default any non GET requests ALWAYS require a valid CSRF token. If a CSRF token is missing Discourse will raise an exception.
2013-07-31 04:59:30 +08:00
2. API calls using the secret API bypass CSRF checks.
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
2013-07-31 04:59:30 +08:00
3. Certain pages are "cachable", we do not render the CSRF token (`<meta name='csrf-token' ...`) on any cachable pages. Instead when users are about to perform the first non GET request they retrieve the token just in time via `GET session/csrf`
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
### DDOS
2019-02-22 23:29:27 +08:00
If you install via our recommended Docker image in our [install guide][ig], nginx is the front end web server. For additional DDOS protection we recommend placing [HAProxy](https://www.haproxy.org/) in front.
2013-07-31 04:57:15 +08:00
### Deployment concerns
2013-07-29 14:25:28 +08:00
We strongly recommend that the various Discourse processes (web server, sidekiq) run under a non-elevated account. This is handled automatically if you install via our recommended Docker image -- see [our install guide][ig] for details.
[ig]: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/docs/INSTALL.md