There are 5 visibility levels (similar to group visibility)
public (default)
logged-in users
members only
staff
owners
Admins & group owners always have visibility to group members.
This reverts commit 1fbe078ae0.
`UserProfile` is created in a callback after the user has been created.
As such, it should be impossible for a user to not have a blank
`UserProfile`. This was also improved in
4f5c9bb8d3.
Apparently is is possible to have a user without a user_profile. This
fix will return nil for any user_profile fields during serialization
(like the after delete web hook) instead of blowing up.
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.
Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
`Upload#url` is more likely and can change from time to time. When it
does changes, we don't want to have to look through multiple tables to
ensure that the URLs are all up to date. Instead, we simply associate
uploads properly to `UserProfile` so that it does not have to replicate
the URLs in the table.
* FEATURE: Add ignored user list to the User's preference page
## Why?
Part of: https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-ignore-a-user/110254
We want to add list of Ignored users under or along with the muted users preferences section.
This way Users can find and update their list of ignored users.
## UI
## Open questions
Two of many options to represent a list of ignored users is that we can:
1. We can represent the ignored user list as a table with the ability to `un-ignore` but NOT to add new ignored users.
2. We can keep it functioning as the `muted user list` where you can `un-ignore` or `ignore` users.
* FEATURE: Added MaxMindDb to resolve IP information.
* FEATURE: Added browser detection based on user agent.
* FEATURE: Added recently used devices in user preferences.
* DEV: Added acceptance test for recently used devices.
* UX: Do not show 'Show more' button if there aren't more tokens.
* DEV: Fix unit tests.
* DEV: Make changes after code review.
* Add more detailed unit tests.
* Improve logging messages.
* Minor coding style fixes.
* DEV: Use DropdownSelectBoxComponent and run Prettier.
* DEV: Fix unit tests.
* `rescue nil` is a really bad pattern to use in our code base.
We should rescue errors that we expect the code to throw and
not rescue everything because we're unsure of what errors the
code would throw. This would reduce the amount of pain we face
when debugging why something isn't working as expexted. I've
been bitten countless of times by errors being swallowed as a
result during debugging sessions.
implemented review items.
Blocking previous codes - valid 2-factor auth tokens can only be authenticated once/30 seconds.
I played with updating the “last used” any time the token was attempted but that seemed to be overkill, and frustrating as to why a token would fail.
Translatable texts.
Move second factor logic to a helper class.
Move second factor specific controller endpoints to its own controller.
Move serialization logic for 2-factor details in admin user views.
Add a login ember component for de-duplication
Fix up code formatting
Change verbiage of google authenticator
add controller tests:
second factor controller tests
change email tests
change password tests
admin login tests
add qunit tests - password reset, preferences
fix: check for 2factor on change email controller
fix: email controller - only show second factor errors on attempt
fix: check against 'true' to enable second factor.
Add modal for explaining what 2fa with links to Google Authenticator/FreeOTP
add two factor to email signin link
rate limit if second factor token present
add rate limiter test for second factor attempts
There are 4 visibility levels
- public (default)
- members only
- staff
- owners
Note, admins and group owners ALWAYS have visibility to groups
Migration treated old "non public" as "members only"
previously we supported blanket read and write for user API, this
change amends it so we can define more limited scopes. A scope only
covers a few routes. You can not grant access to part of the site and
leave a large amount of the information hidden to API consumer.
