Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joffrey JAFFEUX
0b65aa8b77
DEV: ensures we have error message before message check (#24647)
Previously the spec could be flakey as the long message could show on the screen while we await for processing. Now we will first check to have the error message on screen, at this point the erroneous message should never be visible.
2023-11-30 10:55:05 +01:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
90efdd7f9d
PERF: cook message in background (#24227)
This commit starts from a simple observation: cooking messages on the hot path can be slow. Especially with a lot of mentions.

To move cooking from the hot path, this commit has made the following changes:

- updating cooked, inserting mentions and notifying user of new mentions has been moved inside the `process_message` job. It happens right after the `Chat::MessageProcessor` run, which is where the cooking happens.
- the similar existing code in `rebake!` has also been moved to rely on the `process_message`job only
- refactored `create_mentions` and `update_mentions` into one single `upsert_mentions` which can be called invariably
- allows services to decide if their job is ran inline or later. It avoids to need to know you have to use `Jobs.run_immediately!` in this case, in tests it will be inline per default
- made various frontend changes to make the chat-channel component lifecycle clearer. we had to handle `did-update @channel` which was super awkward and creating bugs with listeners which the changes of the PR made clear in failing specs
- adds a new `-processed` (and `-not-processed`) class on the chat message, this is made to have a good lifecyle hook in system specs
2023-11-06 15:45:30 +01:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
41f8bff2c3
DEV: Remove superfluous js: true metadata (#21960)
Why this change?

It is very unlikely that we need to ever JS for system tests considering
that we rely on a JS framework on the frontend.
2023-06-07 09:26:58 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
876734bcb6
DEV: Partially revert d1924c7328 (#21895)
Just remove the assertions for now as they are a constant source of
tests flakiness.
2023-06-02 06:35:42 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
d1924c7328
DEV: Update checks in chat channel and thread page objects (#21889)
What is the problem?

We were calling out to methods that calls `has_css?` or `has_selector?`
which returns a boolean. Since we are not using the return value, it
means the methods can be deemed unnecessary. However, we do want those
checks and this commit adds the necessarily assertions to make use of
the return values.
2023-06-01 22:31:01 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
30e4ebd19b
Revert "DEV: Update checks in chat channel and thread page objects (#21875)" (#21883)
This reverts commit ddf4ecba04.

Causing a flaky test to appear:

```
main $ LOAD_PLUGINS=1 rspec plugins/chat/spec/system/chat/composer/shortcuts/channel_spec.rb

Randomized with seed 17765
.....F..

Failures:

  1) Chat | composer | shortcuts | channel when using ArrowUp when last message is staged does not edit a message
     Failure/Error: channel_page.send_message
       expected `#<PageObjects::Components::Chat::Messages:0x00007fe823ac1710 @context=".chat-channel">.has_message?({:persisted=>true, :text=>"2"})` to be truthy, got false

     [Screenshot Image]: /home/tgxworld/work/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_chat_composer_shortcuts_channel_when_using_arrow_up_when_last_message_is_staged_does_not_edit_a_message_148.png
```
2023-06-01 16:59:03 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
ddf4ecba04
DEV: Update checks in chat channel and thread page objects (#21875)
What is the problem?

We were calling out to methods that calls `has_css?` or `has_selector?`
which returns a boolean. Since we are not using the return value, it
means the methods can be deemed unnecessary. However, we do want those
checks and this commit adds the necessarily assertions to make use of
the return values.
2023-06-01 15:25:11 +08:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
fef279acd5
FIX: do not display the message content when it errors (#21008) 2023-04-06 19:32:21 +02:00