In order to limit issues with duplicate inline CSS definitions, this will now deduplicate inline CSS styles with the "last-to-be-defined-wins" strategy.
Also removes unecessary whitespaces in inline styles.
Context - https://meta.discourse.org/t/resolve-final-styles-in-email-notifications/310219
Co-authored-by: Thomas Kalka <thomas.kalka@gmail.com>
This fix handles the case where an In-Reply-To mail header
can contain multiple Message-IDs. We use this header to
try look up an EmailLog record to find the post to reply
to in the group email inbox flow.
Since the case where multiple In-Reply-To Message-IDs is
rare (we've only seen a couple of instances of this causing
errors in the wild), we are just going to use the first one
in the array.
Also, Discourse does not support replying to multiple posts
at once, so it doesn't really make sense to use multiple
In-Reply-To Message-IDs anyway.
We want to allow lightboxing of smaller images, even if they are below the minimum size for image thumbnail generation.
This change sets a minimum threshold of 100 x 100 pixels for triggering the lightbox.
---------
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
Our old group SMTP SSL option was a checkbox,
but this was not ideal because there are actually
3 different ways SSL can be used when sending
SMTP:
* None
* SSL/TLS
* STARTTLS
We got around this before with specific overrides
for Gmail, but it's not flexible enough and now people
want to use other providers. It's best to be clear,
though it is a technical detail. We provide a way
to test the SMTP settings before saving them so there
should be little chance of messing this up.
This commit also converts GroupEmailSettings to a glimmer
component.
This change how we present attachments from incoming emails to now be "hidden" in a "[details]" so they don't "hang" at the end of the post.
This is especially useful when using Discourse as a support tool where email is the main communication channel. For various reasons, images are often duplicated by email user agents, and hiding them behind the details block help keep the conversation focused on the isssue at hand.
Internal ref t/122333
Followup 96a0781bc1
When sending emails where secure uploads is enabled
and secure_uploads_allow_embed_images_in_emails is
true, we attach the images to the email, and we
do some munging with the final email so the structure
of the MIME parts looks like this:
```
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain
text/html
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/png
```
However, we were not specifying the `boundary` of the
`multipart/mixed` main content-type of the email, so
sometimes the email would come through appearing to
have an empty body with the entire thing attached as
one attachment, and some mail parsers considered the
entire email as the "epilogue" and/or "preamble".
This commit fixes the issue by specifying the boundary
in the content-type header per https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html
* DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1
* FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`
`Rails.logger.chained` was provided by Logster before Rails 7.1
introduced their broadcast logger. Now all the loggers are added to
`Rails.logger.broadcasts`.
Some code in our initializers was still using `chained` instead of
`broadcasts`.
* DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods
* FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)
A followup to f595d599dd
* FIX: Don’t duplicate Rack response
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
* DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1
* FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`
`Rails.logger.chained` was provided by Logster before Rails 7.1
introduced their broadcast logger. Now all the loggers are added to
`Rails.logger.broadcasts`.
Some code in our initializers was still using `chained` instead of
`broadcasts`.
* DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods
* FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)
A followup to f595d599dd
* FIX: Don’t duplicate Rack response
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
We recently fixed a problem where secure upload images weren't re-attached when sending the activity summary e-mail.
This fix contained a bug that would lead to n copies of the e-mail body being included, n being the number of duplicates. This is because #fix_parts_after_attachments! was called once per attachment, and adding more parts to the multipart e-mail.
This PR fixes that by:
Adding a failing test case for the above.
Moving the looping over multiple posts into #fix_parts_after_attachments! itself.
The test that checks that securely uploaded images are re-attached to the digest e-mail wasn't rendering the actual digest e-mail template. This change fixes that.
* Revert "FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)"
This reverts commit c1b0488c54.
* Revert "DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods"
This reverts commit 3318dad7b4.
* Revert "FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`"
This reverts commit f595d599dd.
* Revert "DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1"
This reverts commit 081b00391e.
In #26642 we introduced a change that re-attaches securely uploaded images in the digest e-mail. However, this change assumed that the type argument to the Email::Sender constructor would be a symbol, but when it is coming from the UserEmail job it is a string. This PR fixes that.
Introduced back in 2022 in
e3d495850d,
our new more specific message-id format for inbound and
outbound emails has now been in use for a very long time,
we can remove the support for the old formats:
`topic/:topic_id/:post_id.:random@:host`
`topic/:topic_id@:host`
`topic/:topic_id.:random@:host`
* DEV: allow reply_by_email, visit_link_to_respond strings to be modified by plugins
* DEV: separate visit_link_to_respond and reply_by_email modifiers out
This is a follow up of 5fcb7c262d
It was missing the case where secure uploads is enabled, which creates a copy of the upload no matter what.
So this checks for the original_sha1 of the uploads as well when checking for duplicates.
For e-mails, secure uploads redacts all secure images, and later uses the access control post to re-attached allowed ones. We pass the ID of this post through the X-Discourse-Post-Id header. As the name suggests, this assumes there's only ever one access control post. This is not true for activity summary e-mails, as they summarize across posts.
This adds a new header, X-Discourse-Post-Ids, which is used the same way as the old header, but also works for the case where an e-mail is associated with multiple posts.
## What?
Depending on the email software used, when you reply to an email that has some attachments, they will be sent along, since they're part of the embedded (replied to) email.
When Discourse processes the reply as an incoming email, it will automatically add all the (valid) attachments at the end of the post. Including those that were sent as part of the "embedded reply".
This generates posts in Discourse with duplicate attachments 🙁
## How?
When processing attachments of an incoming email, before we add it to the bottom of the post, we check it against all the previous uploads in the same topic. If there already is an `Upload` record, it means that it's a duplicate and it is _therefore_ skipped.
All the inline attachments are left untouched since they're more likely new attachments added by the sender.
For performance reasons we don't automatically add fabricated users to trust level auto-groups. However, when explicitly passing a trust level to the fabricator, in 99% of cases it means that trust level is relevant for the test, and we need the groups.
This change makes it so that when a trust level is explicitly passed to the fabricator, the auto-groups are refreshed. There's no longer a need to also pass refresh_auto_groups: true, which means clearer tests, fewer mistakes, and less confusion.
We have all these calls to Group.refresh_automatic_groups! littered throughout the tests. Including tests that are seemingly unrelated to groups. This is because automatic group memberships aren't fabricated when making a vanilla user. There are two places where you'd want to use this:
You have fabricated a user that needs a certain trust level (which is now based on group membership.)
You need the system user to have a certain trust level.
In the first case, we can pass refresh_auto_groups: true to the fabricator instead. This is a more lightweight operation that only considers a single user, instead of all users in all groups.
The second case is no longer a thing after #25400.
This change converts the min_trust_to_create_topic site setting to
create_topic_allowed_groups.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408
- Hides the old setting
- Adds the new site setting
- Add a deprecation warning
- Updates to use the new setting
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting if the old setting was
changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates tests to account for the new change
- After a couple of months, we will remove the min_trust_to_create_topicsetting entirely.
Internal ref: /t/117248
This change refactors the check `user.groups.any?` and instead uses
`user.staged?` to check if the user is staged or not.
Also fixes several tests to ensure the users have their auto trust level
groups created.
Follow up to:
- 8a45f84277
- 447d9b2105
- c89edd9e86
This change converts the `email_in_min_trust` site setting to
`email_in_allowed_groups`.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408
- Hides the old setting
- Adds the new site setting
- Add a deprecation warning
- Updates to use the new setting
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting if the old setting was
changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates tests to account for the new change
After a couple of months we will remove the
`email_in_min_trust` setting entirely.
Internal ref: /t/115696
This change converts the `approve_unless_trust_level` site setting to
`approve_unless_allowed_groups`.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408
- Adds the new site setting
- Adds a deprecation warning
- Updates core to use the new settings.
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting of the old setting was
changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates many tests to account for the new change
After a couple of months we will remove the `approve_unless_trust_level`
setting entirely.
Internal ref: /t/115696
The most common thing that we do with fab! is:
fab!(:thing) { Fabricate(:thing) }
This commit adds a shorthand for this which is just simply:
fab!(:thing)
i.e. If you omit the block, then, by default, you'll get a `Fabricate`d object using the fabricator of the same name.
* FIX: Secure upload post processing race condition
This commit fixes a couple of issues.
A little background -- when uploads are created in the composer
for posts, regardless of whether the upload will eventually be
marked secure or not, if secure_uploads is enabled we always mark
the upload secure at first. This is so the upload is by default
protected, regardless of post type (regular or PM) or category.
This was causing issues in some rare occasions though because
of the order of operations of our post creation and processing
pipeline. When creating a post, we enqueue a sidekiq job to
post-process the post which does various things including
converting images to lightboxes. We were also enqueuing a job
to update the secure status for all uploads in that post.
Sometimes the secure status job would run before the post process
job, marking uploads as _not secure_ in the background and changing
their ACL before the post processor ran, which meant the users
would see a broken image in their posts. This commit fixes that issue
by always running the upload security changes inline _within_ the
cooked_post_processor job.
The other issue was that the lightbox wrapper link for images in
the post would end up with a URL like this:
```
href="/secure-uploads/original/2X/4/4e1f00a40b6c952198bbdacae383ba77932fc542.jpeg"
```
Since we weren't actually using the `upload.url` to pass to
`UrlHelper.cook_url` here, we weren't converting this href to the CDN
URL if the post was not in a secure context (the UrlHelper does not
know how to convert a secure-uploads URL to a CDN one). Now we
always end up with the correct lightbox href. This was less of an issue
than the other one, since the secure-uploads URL works even when the
upload has become non-secure, but it was a good inconsistency to fix
anyway.
There are cases where a user can copy image markdown from a public
post (such as via the discourse-templates plugin) into a PM which
is then sent via an email. Since a PM is a secure context (via the
.with_secure_uploads? check on Post), the image will get a secure
URL in the PM post even though the backing upload is not secure.
This fixes the bug in that case where the image would be stripped
from the email (since it had a /secure-uploads/ URL) but not re-attached
further down the line using the secure_uploads_allow_embed_images_in_emails
setting because the upload itself was not secure.
The flow in Email::Sender for doing this is still not ideal, but
there are chicken and egg problems around when to strip the images,
how to fit in with other attachments and email size limits, and
when to apply the images inline via Email::Styles. It's convoluted,
but at least this fixes the Template use case for now.
This commit removes any logic in the app and in specs around
enable_experimental_hashtag_autocomplete and deletes some
old category hashtag code that is no longer necessary.
It also adds a `slug_ref` category instance method, which
will generate a reference like `parent:child` for a category,
with an optional depth, which hashtags use. Also refactors
PostRevisor which was using CategoryHashtagDataSource directly
which is a no-no.
Deletes the old hashtag markdown rule as well.
This commit adds an aria-label attribute to cooked hashtags using
the post/chat message decorateCooked functionality. I have just used
the inner content of the hashtag (the tag/category/channel name) for
the label -- we can reexamine at some point if we want something
different like "Link to dev category" or something, but from what I
can tell things like Twitter don't even have aria-labels for hashtags
so the text would be read out directly.
This commit also refactors any ruby specs checking the HTML of hashtags
to use rspec-html-matchers which is far clearer than having to maintain
the HTML structure in a HEREDOC for comparison, and gives better spec
failures.
c.f. https://meta.discourse.org/t/hashtags-are-getting-a-makeover/248866/23?u=martin
This commit makes some fundamental changes to how hashtag cooking and
icon generation works in the new experimental hashtag autocomplete mode.
Previously we cooked the appropriate SVG icon with the cooked hashtag,
though this has proved inflexible especially for theming purposes.
Instead, we now cook a data-ID attribute with the hashtag and add a new
span as an icon placeholder. This is replaced on the client side with an
icon (or a square span in the case of categories) on the client side via
the decorateCooked API for posts and chat messages.
This client side logic uses the generated hashtag, category, and channel
CSS classes added in a previous commit.
This is missing changes to the sidebar to use the new generated CSS
classes and also colors and the split square for categories in the
hashtag autocomplete menu -- I will tackle this in a separate PR so it
is clearer.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-mailman-email-parsing/253041
When mirroring a public mailling list which uses mailman, there were some cases where the incoming email was not associated to the proper user.
As it happens, for various (undertermined) reasons, the email from the sender is often not in the `From` header but can be in any of the following headers: `Reply-To`, `CC`, `X-Original-From`, `X-MailFrom`.
It might be in other headers as well, but those were the ones we found the most reliable.
Currently processing emails that are blank or have a nil value for the mail will cause several errors.
This update allows emails with blank body or missing sender to log the blank email error to the mail logs rather than throwing an error.
This header is used by Microsoft Exchange to indicate when certain types of
autoresponses should not be generated for an email.
It triggers our "is this mail autogenerated?" detection, but should not be used
for this purpose.
