Fixes the support for kwargs in `DiscourseEvent.trigger()` on Ruby 3, e.g.
```rb
DiscourseEvent.trigger(:before_system_message_sent, message_type: type, recipient: @recipient, post_creator_args: post_creator_args, params: method_params)
```
Fixes https://github.com/discourse/discourse-local-site-contacts
If a secure upload's access_control_post was trashed, and an anon user
tried to look at that upload, they would get a 500 error rather than
the correct 403 because of an error inside the PostGuardian logic.
There are various performance issues with the Canvas in iOS Safari
that are causing crashes when processing images with spikes of over 100%
CPU usage. The cause of this is unknown, but profiling points to
CanvasRenderingContext2D.getImageData() and
CanvasRenderingContext2D.drawImage().
Until Safari makes some progress with OffscreenCanvas or other
alternatives we cannot support this workflow. We will revisit in 6
months.
This is gated behind the hidden `composer_ios_media_optimisation_image_enabled`
site setting for people who really still want to try using this.
This commit introduces the necessary gems and config, but adds all our ruby code directories to the `--ignore-files` list.
Future commits will apply syntax_tree to parts of the codebase, removing the ignore patterns as we go
This change adds `target` to the set of attributes allowed by the
HTML sanitizer which is applied to the description of a user_field.
The rationale for this change:
* If one puts a link (<a>...</a>) in the description of a user_field
that is present and/or required at sign-up, the expectation is that
a prospective new user will click on that link during sign-up.
* Without an appropriate `target` attribute on the link, the new page
will be loaded in the same window/tab as the sign-up form, but this
will obliterate any fields that the user had already filled-out on
the form. (E.g., hitting the back-button will return to an
empty form.)
* Such UX behavior is incredibly aggravating to new users.
This change allows an admin to add a `target` attribute to links, to
instruct the browser to open them in a different window/tab, leaving
a sign-up form intact.
This commit introduces the experimental `registerUserCategorySectionLinkCountable`
and `refreshUserSidebarCategoriesSectionCounts` plugin APIs that allows
a plugin to register custom countables to category section links on top
of the defaults of unread and new.
Links to category settings were created using the category name. If the name was a single word, the link would be valid (regardless of capitalization).
For example, if the category was named `Awesome`
`/c/Awesome/edit/settings`
is a valid URL as that is a case-insensitive match for the category slug of `awesome`.
However, if the category had a space in it, the URL would be
`/c/Awesome%20Name/edit/settings`
which does not match the slug of `awesome-name`.
This change uses the category slug, rather than the name, which is the expected behaviour (see `Category.find_by_slug_path`).
This commit does a couple of things:
1. Changes the limit of tags to include a subject for a
notification email to the `max_tags_per_topic` setting
instead of the arbitrary 3 limit
2. Adds both an X-Discourse-Tags and X-Discourse-Category
custom header to outbound emails containing the tags
and category from the subject, so people on mail clients
that allow advanced filtering (i.e. not Gmail) can filter
mail by tags and category, which is useful for mailing
list mode users
c.f. https://meta.discourse.org/t/headers-for-email-notifications-so-that-gmail-users-can-filter-on-tags/249982/17
In certain cases, like when `SiteSetting.slug_generation_method`
is set to `none` with certain locales, the autogenerated chat
channel slugs will end up blank. This was causing errors in
unrelated jobs calling `update!` on the channel. Instead, we
should just copy Category behaviour, which does not error
if the autogenerated slug ends up blank. We already allow
for this with chat channel URLs, using `-` in place of the
missing slug.
The problem here was that if your input has an Enter
listener (such as the chat message input) and the
`fill_in(with: str)` string has a `\n` at the end, this
is treated as an Enter keypress, so this `fill_in` was
submitting the chat message.
We previously used post creator's guardian permissions which will raise an error if the reviewer added a staff-only (restricted) tag.
Co-authored-by: Natalie Tay <natalie.tay@discourse.org>
Having this set to ALL pollutes the JS system spec
logs with a bunch of unnecessary noise like this:
> "PresenceChannel '/chat-user/core/1' dropped message (received 315, expecting 246), resyncing..."
Or:
> "DEPRECATION: The \u003Cdiscourse@component:plugin-connector::ember1112>#save computed property was just overridden. This removes the computed property and replaces it with a plain value, and has been deprecated.
Now, we will only log errors. To configure this set
the `SELENIUM_BROWSER_LOG_LEVEL` env var.
Our working theory is that system tests on Github run on much less
powerful hardware as compared to running the tests on our work machines.
Hopefully, increasing the wait time now will help reduce some flakes
that we're seeing on Github.
This feature is stable enough now to make it the default going forward
for new sites. Existing sites that have not yet set enable_experimental_hashtag_autocomplete
to `true` will have it set to `false` for their site settings, which was the old default.
c.f https://meta.discourse.org/t/hashtags-are-getting-a-makeover/248866
This commit fixes an issue where the chat message bookmarks
did not respect the user's `bookmark_auto_delete_preference`
which they select in their user preference page.
Also, it changes the default for that value to "keep bookmark and clear reminder"
rather than "never", which ends up leaving a lot of expired bookmark
reminders around which are a pain to clean up.
When sending emails out via group SMTP, if we
are sending them to non-staged users we want
to mask those emails with BCC, just so we don't
expose them to anyone we shouldn't. Staged users
are ones that have likely only interacted with
support via email, and will likely include other
people who were CC'd on the original email to the
group.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
