Using the lastViewedTopicId indiscriminately can cause strange scrolling behavior when navigating to a **different** topic list after viewing a topic. We only want to refocus the topic when going 'back' to the same topic list which originally triggered the navigation.
Previously we were implementing scroll reset/memorization on a per-page basis. Many of these approaches relied on the `didInsertElement` hook, which is no longer appropriate since Discourse changed to use the 'loading slider' strategy for page transitions.
This commit rips out all of our custom scroll resetting/memorizing, and implements those things in a generic service. There are two features:
1. After every route transition, scroll to the top of the page
2. When using browser back/forward buttons, restore the last known scroll position for those routes
To opt-out of the behaviour, individual routes can add a scrollOnTransition boolean to their RouteInfo metadata using Ember's `buildRouteInfoMetadata` hook.
Why this change?
Prior to this change, dismissing unreads posts did not publish the
changes across clients for the same user. As a result, users can end up
seeing an unread count being present but saw no topics being loaded when
visiting the `/unread` route.
Why this change?
Group mention notifications are currently placed in the "Others" tab
of the user menu which is odd considering that mentioned notifications
are in the reply tab. This commit changes it such that group mention
notifications are displayed in the reply tab as well.
Why is this change being made?
We've decided that the previous "community" section should look more
like a primary section that holds the most important navigation links
for the site and the word "community" doesn't quite fit that
description. Therefore, we've made the decision to drop the
section heading for the community section.
As part of removing the section heading, the following changes are made
as well:
1. Button to customize the section has been moved to the "footer" of the
"More..." section when `navigation_menu` site setting is set to `sidebar`.
When `navigation_menu` is set to `header dropdown`, a button to customize
the section is shown inline.
2. The section will no longer be collapsable.
3. The title of the section is no longer customisable as it is no longer
displayed. As a technical note, we have not dropped any previous
customisations of the section's title previously in case we have to
bring back the header in the future.
4. The new topic button that was previously present in the header has
been removed alongside the header. Admins can add a custom section
link to the `/new-topic` route if there would like to make it easier for
users to create a new topic in the sidebar.
What is the problem?
This regressed in fe294ab1a7 and we did
not have any tests on mobile to catch the regression. The problem was
that we were conditionally rendering the edit nav menu modals component
in the sidebar. However, the sidebar is collapsed on mobile when a
button is clicked. When the sidebar collapses, the edit nav menu modals
ended up being destroyed with it.
Before this change, links which required full reload because they are not in ember routes like `/my/preferences` or links to docs like `/pub/*` were treated as real external links. Therefore, they were opening in self window or new tab based on user `external_links_in_new_tab` setting.
To be consistent with behavior when full reload links are in the post, they are treated as internal and always open in the same window.
Why this change?
Predicate matchers are poor at providing good error messages when it
fails if all the predicate matcher does is to return a boolean. Prior to
this change, we were using `has_css? && all?` to assert for the tag
section links. There are two problems here. Firstly, when one of the matchers
fail, the error message does not provide any indication of which matcher
failed making it hard to debug failures. Secondly, the matchers were not
able to assert for the ordering of the tag section links which is an
important behaviour to assert for.
This commit changes `PageObjects::Components::Sidebar#has_tag_section_links?`
such that we make use of assertions to ensure ordering. The usage of
`all` will also provide a clear error message when things go wrong.
When a site does not have `default_navigation_menu_tags`
site setting set, anonymous users should be shown the site's top tags as
a default in the tags section. However, this regressed in 9fad71809c
and we ended up showing anonymous users a tags section with only the
`All Tags` section link.
As part of this commit, I have also refactored the QUnit acceptance
tests to system tests which are much easier to work with.
There is a problem that unread and new count is not updated to reflecting topicTrackingState.
It is because discourseComputed on Category is not working properly with topicTrackingState. Moving it to component level is making counter reliable.
What does this change do?
This change is a first pass for adding a modal used to edit tags that appears in
the navigation menu. As the feature is being worked on in phases, it is
currently hidden behind the `new_edit_sidebar_categories_tags_interface_groups` site setting.
The following features will be worked on in future commits:
1. Input filter to filter through the tgas
2. Button to reset tag selection to default navigation menu tags site
settings
3. Button to deselect all current selection
Today I learnt that `has_link?("text of link")` by default does an
includes instead of looking for a link with the exact text. This is not
the behaviour I want so I'm changing
`PageObjects::Components::Sidebar.has_section_link?` to use the
`exact_text` option instead.
What this change?
We are currently not fully satisfied with the current way to edit the
categories and tags that appears in the sidebar where the user is
redirected to the tracking preferences tab in the user's profile causing
the user to lose context of the current page. In addition, the dropdown
to select categories or tags limits the amount of information we can
display.
Since editing or adding a custom categories section is already using a
modal, we have decided to switch editing the categories and tags that
appear in the sidebar to use a modal as well.
This commit ships a first pass of the edit categories modal such that we
can keep the commit small and reviewable. The incomplete nature of the
feature is also reflected in the fact that the feature is hidden behind
a new `new_edit_sidebar_categories_tags_interface_groups` site setting.
What is the problem?
Prior to this change, we had a `has_css?(context + ":not(.is-expanded)"`
check when using the select-kit component page object. The problem here
is that this check will end up waiting the full capybara default wait
time if the select-kit has already been expanded. It turns out that we
were calling this check alot of times when the select-kit has already
been expanded resulting in many tests waiting the full default wait
time.
What is the fix?
The fix here is to specify the `wait: 0` option such that we do not wait
and fundamentally, there is no need for us to wait at all here.
Allow admins to edit Community section. This includes drag and drop reorder, change names, delete and reset to default.
Visual improvements introduced in edit community section modal are available in edit custom section form as well. For example:
- drag and drop links to change their position;
- smaller icon picker.
The fix use the SelectKit component in the spec and improves reliability of SelectKit component to ensure expanded/collapsed state effectively set/present.
Multiple lines have also been removed as they are not necessary, eg:
- check button is present
- click button
The check is un-necesssary as we won't find the button on click if not present. This kind of checks are only necessary when another element has to be present before the button is show, eg:
- check modal is displayed
- click button
FInally this commit changes the way the SelectKit component initializes component and now uses a css selector instead of a finder, it ensures we are always getting fresh object and allows to build complete selectors: ".context[data-id=1].foo:enabled"
This commit also includes two changes to the rails helper which make tests more consistent on different devices. With this change the failure was reproducible locally and not only on CI:
```
options.add_argument("--force-device-scale-factor=1")
```
The fix itself is quite simple and attempts to find safe click coordinates, the previous solution could fail depending on the size of the sidebar.
What is the problem?
We are relying on RSpec custom matchers in system tests by defining
predicates in page objects. The problem is that this can result in a
system test unnecessarily waiting up till the full duration of
Capybara's default wait time when the RSpec custom matcher is used with
`not_to`. Considering this topic page object where we have a `has_post?`
predicate defined.
```
class Topic < PageObject
def has_post?
has_css?('something')
end
end
```
The assertion `expect(Topic.new).not_to have_post` will end up waiting
the full Capybara's default wait time since the RSpec custom matcher is
calling Capybara's `has_css?` method which will wait until the selector
appear. If the selector has already disappeared by the time the
assertion is called, we end up waiting for something that will never
exists.
This commit fixes such cases by introducing new predicates that uses
the `has_no_*` versions of Capybara's node matchers.
For future reference, `to have_css` and `not_to have_css` is safe to sue
because the RSpec matcher defined by Capbyara is smart enough to call
`has_css?` or `has_no_css?` based on the expectation of the assertion.
This was failing quite often with the following error:
```
1) Emoji deny list when using composer should remove denied emojis from emoji picker
Failure/Error: find("#{COMPOSER_ID} .emoji-picker")
Capybara::ElementNotFound:
Unable to find css "#reply-control .emoji-picker"
```
This was because our `click_toolbar_button` call on the Composer
page object used a number for the position of the toolbar button,
which can be flaky since there are things that hide/show toolbar
buttons or change their position.
Each toolbar button in the composer has a CSS class, so it is
more reliable to use that instead. Also fixed an instance of
calling `has_X?` method directly instead of using the
`have_x` rspec matcher.
Responding to negative behaviour tends to solicit more of the same. Common wisdom states: "don't feed the trolls".
This change codifies that advice by introducing a new nudge when hitting the reply button on a flagged post. It will be shown if either the current user, or two other users (configurable via a site setting) have flagged the post.
Following a change in e9f7262813 which prevents the notification level to be returned from the update endpoint, the model couldn't update itself. This commit makes the update manually and adds a test to prevent future regressions.
Note we could also change the backend endpoint, but this should work correctly with minimum risk.
This feature will allow sites to define which emoji are not allowed. Emoji in this list should be excluded from the set we show in the core emoji picker used in the composer for posts when emoji are enabled. And they should not be allowed to be chosen to be added to messages or as reactions in chat.
This feature prevents denied emoji from appearing in the following scenarios:
- topic title and page title
- private messages (topic title and body)
- inserting emojis into a chat
- reacting to chat messages
- using the emoji picker (composer, user status etc)
- using search within emoji picker
It also takes into account the various ways that emojis can be accessed, such as:
- emoji autocomplete suggestions
- emoji favourites (auto populates when adding to emoji deny list for example)
- emoji inline translations
- emoji skintones (ie. for certain hand gestures)
Previously, public custom sections were only visible to logged-in users. In this PR, we are making them visible to anonymous as well.
The reason is that Community Section will be moved into custom section model to be easily editable by admins.
Change styling of filter input & remove button.
This follows the same pattern of design we use for search. In the search dropdown we do not have a button to search. We rely on pressing enter. I've also provided an example of Github's PR filter UI at the bottom of this comment.
We also do not have buttons like this on any other topic-list header. On tag and category dropdowns, we also rely on pressing enter to filter the topic list by chosen categories & tags.
Co-authored-by: Jordan Vidrine <jordan@jordanvidrine.com>
When a category has default_list_filter=none, there were a number of issues which this commit resolves:
1. When using the breadcrumbs to navigate a `default_list_filter=none` category, adding a tag filter would not apply the no-subcategories filter, but the subcategories dropdown would still say 'none'. This commit adjusts `getCategoryAndTagUrl` so that `/none` is added to the URL
2. When landing on `/tags/c/{slug}/{id}/{tag}`, for a default_list_filter=none category, it would include subcategories. This commit introduces a client-side redirect to match the behavior of `/c/{slug}/{id}`
3. When directly navigating to `/c/{slug}/{id}`, it was correctly redirecting to `/c/{slug}/{id}/none`, BUT it was still using the preloaded data for the old route. This has been happening since e7a84948. Prior to that, the preloaded data was discarded and a new JSON request was made to the server. This commit restores that discarding behavior. In future we may want to look into making this more efficient.
System specs are introduced to provide end-end testing of this functionality
* DEV: Change sidebar header dropdown to use wait_for_animation
Introduced in 54351e1b8a, this
helper should remove the need to have to add the .animated
CSS class in JS for the sidebar.
* DEV: Revert spec change
What is the problem?
We have a hidden site setting `show_category_definitions_in_topic_lists`
which is set to false by default. What this means is that category
definition topics are not shown in the topic list by default. Only the
category definition topic for the category being viewed will be shown.
However, we have a bug where we would show that a category has new
topics when a new child category along with its category definition
topic is created even though the topic list does not list the child
category's category definition topic.
What is the fix here?
This commit fixes the problem by shipping down an additional
`is_category_topic` attribute in `TopicTrackingStateItemSerializer` when
the `show_category_definitions_in_topic_lists` site setting has been set
to false. With the new attribute, we can then exclude counting child
categories' category definition topics when counting new and unread
counts for a category.
Small js fix for fast edit to allow posts to save changes when the post contains apostrophes and quotation marks. Replaces unicode characters in text prior to saving the edit.
Includes system tests for fast edit and introduces a new system spec component for fast edit usage.
Fixes issue introduced in 7ef482a292
where the correct warning message was not shown when enabling auto-join
for public categories when creating a channel. Adds more system specs
as well to avoid regressions.
When the `navigation_menu` site setting has been set to `sidebar` or
`header dropdown`, overriding the site setting via the `navigation_menu`
query params did not work.
Follow-up to c47015b861
What does this change do?
This commit the client to override the navigation menu setting
configured by the site temporarily based on the value of the
`navigation_menu` query param. The new query param replaces the old
`enable_sidebar` query param.
Why do we need this change?
The motivation here is to allow theme maintainers to quickly preview
what the site will look like with the various navigation menu site
setting.
Allows users to configure their own custom sidebar sections with links withing Discourse instance. Links can be passed as relative path, for example "/tags" or full URL.
Only path is saved in DB, so when Discourse domain is changed, links will be still valid.
Feature is hidden behind SiteSetting.enable_custom_sidebar_sections. This hidden setting determines the group which members have access to this new feature.
The latter can be called directly from the Topic page object,
so we can remove some duplication between the two. There are
levels of page objects (e.g. entire page, component, complete flow)
and its perfectly valid to call one from another.
