When the client received a new notification, it prioritized only PM
notifications instead of maintaining the priority order. Later, the
check for missing notification deleted all notifications that were
in the wrong order because it could not match the IDs.
The correct order puts high_priority AND unread notifications first.
Low priority or read notifications (including high priority, but read
notifications) come after.
The 'Discourse SSO' protocol is being rebranded to DiscourseConnect. This should help to reduce confusion when 'SSO' is used in the generic sense.
This commit aims to:
- Rename `sso_` site settings. DiscourseConnect specific ones are prefixed `discourse_connect_`. Generic settings are prefixed `auth_`
- Add (server-side-only) backwards compatibility for the old setting names, with deprecation notices
- Copy `site_settings` database records to the new names
- Rename relevant translation keys
- Update relevant translations
This commit does **not** aim to:
- Rename any Ruby classes or methods. This might be done in a future commit
- Change any URLs. This would break existing integrations
- Make any changes to the protocol. This would break existing integrations
- Change any functionality. Further normalization across DiscourseConnect and other auth methods will be done separately
The risks are:
- There is no backwards compatibility for site settings on the client-side. Accessing auth-related site settings in Javascript is fairly rare, and an error on the client side would not be security-critical.
- If a plugin is monkey-patching parts of the auth process, changes to locale keys could cause broken error messages. This should also be unlikely. The old site setting names remain functional, so security-related overrides will remain working.
A follow-up commit will be made with a post-deploy migration to delete the old `site_settings` rows.
The payload when receiving a notification webhook is pointless without
knowing which user the notification is for. This fix adds the user_id to
the notification serializer so that when you receive a notification
webhook you can properly identify which user the notification is for.
See
https://meta.discourse.org/t/getting-the-target-user-for-notification-webhook-events/129052?u=blake
for more details.
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.
Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
