Consolidated chat notifications went live for a short amount of time then reverted the commit due to UX concerns.
The result of this is that there are a few users affected that will have notifications in a blank state.
As a workaround this PR will hide those notifications until the feature is ready to merge again.
This PR is a first step towards private groups. It redesigns settings/members area of a channel and also drops the "about" page which is now mixed into settings.
This commit is also:
- introducing chat-form, a small DSL to create forms, ideally I would want something in core for this
- introducing a DToggleSwitch page object component to simplify testing toggles
- migrating various components to gjs
Faker can generate test containing `...` which will get converted to `…` by `PrettyText`, it means that we can't use the input to check the output. This commit simply normalise the generated text to ensure this part of the input is not modified.
I don't have a repro of this ATM, but I suspect that ensuring the panel has been opened before moving to next tests could make this test more resilient.
At the moment writing a mention similar to `@bob...hi` would have resulted in chat trying to find a user named `bob...hi` which would fail.
This was due to the `replacements` rule not being present in the rules used to cook chat messages.
We are still missing few default rules like: normalize, smartquotes, text_join, ... which don't seem to be necessary but could be added if we found a reason for. More info at: e476f78bc3/lib/parser_core.js
Workaround for an issue we are experiencing on thread index frontend where thread loads participants correctly (up to 10), then refreshes the threads and then limits to 3 participants.
There is an issue with storing threads for the main channel view and the thread list in the same store so handling the max participants on the frontend is a workaround until channel.threadsManager is updated.
I've adjusted the tests to handle the additional data being returned from ThreadParticipantQuery.
Why this change?
Back in May 17 2023 along with the release of Discourse 3.1, we announced
on meta that the legacy hamburger dropdown navigation menu is
deprecated and will be dropped in Discourse 3.2. This is the link to the announcement
on meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/removing-the-legacy-hamburger-navigation-menu-option/265274
## What does this change do?
This change removes the `legacy` option from the `navigation_menu` site
setting and migrates existing sites on the `legacy` option to the
`header dropdown` option.
All references to the `legacy` option in code and tests have been
removed as well.
* UX: fix padding on active touch
* UX: thread list header bigger + alignment
* UX: thread list alignment desktop
* UX: visual corrections to alignment
* UX: mobile alignment and padding
UX changes to thread item:
- drop "last reply" timestamp copy
- drop last reply excerpt
- show up 9+OP members
Co-authored-by: David Battersby <info@davidbattersby.com>
We noticed some of these tests were flaky, sometimes they fail on assertions
related to testing tooltips. Tooltips are generally hard to test, and it's not
necessary to test tooltips in every test case. This PR isolates tooltip testing
in a dedicated test case.
Note we already did the same thing for another spec in a9dfda2 and that
seems to worked well.
Tooltips are generally hard to test, and we noticed that they make tests flaky.
We may not test tooltips in these acceptance tests, since they are already
tested in components/chat-channel-test.js. This PR deletes tooltip-related
assertions and unskips tests that became flaky after adding them.
Partial revert of 97a812f022.
Calling hide_plugin also hides the Chat tab in the plugins
section of admin, which is a way plugins can add an advanced
UI (in the case of chat Export and Webhooks).
Until we decide what to do in this case, it's better to revert,
since all this will do is make the discourse-chat plugin show
up again in the plugin list and restore the missing tab.
This commit brings two fixes.
- increase the delay to trigger the action menu
- check of user activation before using vibrate:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Sticky_activationhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/User_activationhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/UserActivation/hasBeenActive
> Sticky activation is a window state that indicates a user has pressed a button, moved a mouse, used a menu, or performed some other user interaction. It is not reset after it has been set initially (unlike transient activation).
> APIs that require sticky activation (not exhaustive):
> - Navigator.vibrate()
> - VirtualKeyboard.show()
> - Autoplay of Media and Web Audio APIs (in particular for AudioContexts).
Before this fix, we could end up with this error in the console in tests:
> Blocked call to navigator.vibrate because user hasn't tapped on the frame or any embedded
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
- Allows to copy quotes from mobile
- Allows to copy text of a message from mobile
- Allows to select messages by clicking on it when selection has started
Note this commit is also now using toasts to show a confirmation of copy, and refactors system specs helpers concerning secondary actions.
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
1. actually call `popupAjaxError`, thanks :P
2. don't close a modal on error
3. use `extractError()` instead of manually joining error messages
4. …or passing just the error object to `this.flash`
As per 92839dc722 lastMessage won't be null when a message is deleted. This would cause sorting issues when messages from a direct message channels are deleted as we would try to sort on last message and thought it would exist when actually it would be a null message.
I might rethink this design to not return any last_message in this case soon as checking on ID feels dirty and prone to error, so only fixing the issue for now.
This commit is also using `@cached` to avoid replaying the sort logic on each access.
This PR introduces three new concepts to Discourse codebase through an addon called "FloatKit":
- menu
- tooltip
- toast
## Tooltips
### Component
Simple cases can be express with an API similar to DButton:
```hbs
<DTooltip
@Label={{i18n "foo.bar"}}
@ICON="check"
@content="Something"
/>
```
More complex cases can use blocks:
```hbs
<DTooltip>
<:trigger>
{{d-icon "check"}}
<span>{{i18n "foo.bar"}}</span>
</:trigger>
<:content>
Something
</:content>
</DTooltip>
```
### Service
You can manually show a tooltip using the `tooltip` service:
```javascript
const tooltipInstance = await this.tooltip.show(
document.querySelector(".my-span"),
options
)
// and later manual close or destroy it
tooltipInstance.close();
tooltipInstance.destroy();
// you can also just close any open tooltip through the service
this.tooltip.close();
```
The service also allows you to register event listeners on a trigger, it removes the need for you to manage open/close of a tooltip started through the service:
```javascript
const tooltipInstance = this.tooltip.register(
document.querySelector(".my-span"),
options
)
// when done you can destroy the instance to remove the listeners
tooltipInstance.destroy();
```
Note that the service also allows you to use a custom component as content which will receive `@data` and `@close` as args:
```javascript
const tooltipInstance = await this.tooltip.show(
document.querySelector(".my-span"),
{
component: MyComponent,
data: { foo: 1 }
}
)
```
## Menus
Menus are very similar to tooltips and provide the same kind of APIs:
### Component
```hbs
<DMenu @ICON="plus" @Label={{i18n "foo.bar"}}>
<ul>
<li>Foo</li>
<li>Bat</li>
<li>Baz</li>
</ul>
</DMenu>
```
They also support blocks:
```hbs
<DMenu>
<:trigger>
{{d-icon "plus"}}
<span>{{i18n "foo.bar"}}</span>
</:trigger>
<:content>
<ul>
<li>Foo</li>
<li>Bat</li>
<li>Baz</li>
</ul>
</:content>
</DMenu>
```
### Service
You can manually show a menu using the `menu` service:
```javascript
const menuInstance = await this.menu.show(
document.querySelector(".my-span"),
options
)
// and later manual close or destroy it
menuInstance.close();
menuInstance.destroy();
// you can also just close any open tooltip through the service
this.menu.close();
```
The service also allows you to register event listeners on a trigger, it removes the need for you to manage open/close of a tooltip started through the service:
```javascript
const menuInstance = this.menu.register(
document.querySelector(".my-span"),
options
)
// when done you can destroy the instance to remove the listeners
menuInstance.destroy();
```
Note that the service also allows you to use a custom component as content which will receive `@data` and `@close` as args:
```javascript
const menuInstance = await this.menu.show(
document.querySelector(".my-span"),
{
component: MyComponent,
data: { foo: 1 }
}
)
```
## Toasts
Interacting with toasts is made only through the `toasts` service.
A default component is provided (DDefaultToast) and can be used through dedicated service methods:
- this.toasts.success({ ... });
- this.toasts.warning({ ... });
- this.toasts.info({ ... });
- this.toasts.error({ ... });
- this.toasts.default({ ... });
```javascript
this.toasts.success({
data: {
title: "Foo",
message: "Bar",
actions: [
{
label: "Ok",
class: "btn-primary",
action: (componentArgs) => {
// eslint-disable-next-line no-alert
alert("Closing toast:" + componentArgs.data.title);
componentArgs.close();
},
}
]
},
});
```
You can also provide your own component:
```javascript
this.toasts.show(MyComponent, {
autoClose: false,
class: "foo",
data: { baz: 1 },
})
```
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <mjrbrennan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Isaac Janzen <50783505+janzenisaac@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
Why this change?
Before this change, we were doing a partial match when checking for
existence. This is a source of flaky tests because a chat message with
text `this is a message` will match any substring like `message` or `a`.
What does this change do?
This change removes the partial match and instead opts for the
`exact_text` option instead.
This would cause an error when deleting the original message of a thread, due to the non existing `last_message`. This fix is implemented using the null pattern.
Note this commit is also using this opportunity to unify naming of null objects, `Chat::DeletedUser` becomes `Chat::NullUser`, it feels better to have a name describing what is the object, instead of a name describing why this object has to be used, which can change depending on cases.
While very fast and powerful staged threads forces a lot of gymnastic and edge cases. This patch adds a new service `Chat::CreateThread` and uses it to create a thread unconditionally when a user replies to a message in a threading enabled channel. If the user actually doesn’t send a message we will have a thread with no messages which has no important impact and could even be periodically cleaned if necessary.
Note that this commit also moves message actions to .gjs as it was the original goal of this PR to correctly check for staged thread to show the menu or not.
This feature adds notifications for chat messages that are sent within personal chats (1:1 and personal group chats).
To prevent notification spam we make use of consolidated notifications to combine updated message information in a meaningful way that allows the receiver to quickly jump into the chat to see what they missed.
This update respects muted channels, muted and blocked users. It will only create a new notification when the user has not muted the channel and the notified user is not muting or ignoring the message sender.
Why this change?
We have been bitten by bugs where tests are not catching missing
interpolate argument in our client side code because the JavaScript
tests are also using `I18n.translate` to assert that the right message
is shown. Before this change, `I18n.interpolate` will just replace the
missing interpolation argument in the final translation with some
placeholder. As a result, we ended up comparing a broken translation
with another broken translation in the test environment.
Why does this change do?
This change introduces the `I18n.testing` property which when set to
`true` will cause `I18n.translate` to throw an error when an interpolate
argument is missing. With this commit, we also set `I18n.testing = true`
when running qunit acceptance test.
