We have the max_mentions_per_chat_message site settings; when a user tries
to mention more users than allowed, no one gets mentioned.
Chat messages may contain code-blocks with strings that look like mentions:
def foo
@bar + @baz
end
The problem is that the parsing code considers these as real mentions and counts
them when checking the limit. This commit fixes the problem.
Currently, the logic for creating a new chat message is scattered
between a controller and an “old” service.
This patch address this issue by creating a new service (using the “new”
sevice object system) encapsulating all the necessary logic.
(authorization, publishing events, etc.)
Chat review queue flags were missing the context message above the actions.
This is probably because the (reasonably complex) logic was somewhat hard-coded to posts. After some investigation I concluded we can reuse this logic with some small amendments.
- moves the onebox logic away from `plugin.rb` to a new `onebox_handler` lib
- splits the `discourse_chat_message` template into two: one for channels, and one for messages
- refactors the logic code slightly to send only the necessary arguments to each template
This commit shouldn't change end-user behavior.
It is hard to catch and debug potential bugs related to live updates of user status
(though, we haven't seen many such bugs so far). We have a `console.warn`
statement that should help us to catch one class of such bugs.
Recently, we noticed that this warning gets printed when a user had a chat with
a user that was then deleted.
This is not a bug, since there is nothing to track for a deleted user, but we don't
want this noise on the console. This PR makes sure we don't print a warning in
such cases.
The unread(s) will still show in the sidebar, outside of chat and when in drawer mode. This is to prevent the confusion to show an unread count for chat on a button which is going to take the user out of chat.
This PR swaps out the custom pathway to publishing and rendering mention warnings after a message is sent.
ChatPublisher#publish_notice is used, and expanded. Now, instead of only accepting text_content as an argument, component and component_args are accepted and there is a renderer for these components.
Translations moved to server, as notices expect text to be passed in unless a component is rendered
The warnings are rendered at the top now, outside of the scope of the single message that sent it.
I entirely removed the jit_messages_spec b/c it's duplicate testing of other parts of the app. IMO we don't need a backend test for a feature, a component test for the feature AND a system test (that is slow and potentially even flakey due to timing issues with wait) to test the same thing. So jit_messages_spec is gone.
Prior to this fix we would scroll the emoji picker with the body of the page in drawer mode.
With this fix scrolling inside the drawer or the emoji picker will scroll the drawer or the emoji picker, but, scrolling body will close the chat emoji picker.
1. Use `this.` instead of `{{action}}` where applicable
2. Use `{{fn}}` instead of `@actionParam` where applicable
3. Use non-`@` versions of class/type/tabindex/aria-controls/aria-expanded
4. Remove `btn` class (it's added automatically to all DButtons)
5. Remove `type="button"` (it's the default)
6. Use `concat-class` helper
This is extracted from #22390.
This patch aims to ease the transition to the new message creation
service. (in progress in #22390) Indeed, the new service patch is
breaking some specs from `discourse-ai` and `discourse-templates`
because these plugins are using either `Chat::MessageCreator` or the
`chat_message` fabricator.
This patch addresses theses issues by normalizing how we create a chat
message in specs. To do so, the preferred way is to use
`Fabricate(:chat_message)` with a new `:use_service` option allowing to
call the service under the hood. While this patch will obviously call
`Chat::MessageCreator`, the new service patch will now be able to simply
change the call to `Chat::CreateMessage` without breaking any specs from
other plugins.
Another thing this patch does is to not create chat messages using the
service for specs that aren’t system ones, thus speeding the execution
time a bit in the process.
Most of the core plugins were already hidden, this hides
chat, styleguide, and checklist to avoid potential confusion
for end users.
Also removes respond_to? :hide_plugin, since that API has been
in place for a while now.
This moves the "delete message" action (if it is available) of a flagged chat message under the "ignore" menu. This puts it on par with the menu for flagged posts.
This commit fixes an issue from 2ecc8291e8
where the user sees an ugly plain #hashtag when sending a chat
message. Now, we add a basic placeholder that looks like the
cooked hashtag with a grey square, which is then filled in
once the "sent" message bus event for the message comes back,
and we do decorateCooked on the message to fill in the proper
hashtag details.
When flagging a chat message, and options included both notifying user and notifying staff, the modal was missing the separating text. This was happening because the #staffFlagsAvailable method was based on post flags, and the model for chat flags is slightly different. This fixes that by delegating to the relevant flag target object.
Tries to fix the composer upload spec by making the upload
slow enough to allow clicking the Cancel button, and improves
generally the API for CDP network changes.
Channels and threads are cached as much as possible, as a result the `last_message_bus_id` can become stalled.
It was for example exhibited with the following actions:
- open a channel (A)
- send a message
- navigate to another channel (B)
- come back to channel (A), and you would actually get all the messages replayed since you opened (A) for the first time as the `last_message_bus_id` would only refresh on a full page reload
This was technically not causing known bugs ATM, but was probably the source of few hard to repro bugs and would for sure cause issues in the future.
Co-authored-by: Mark VanLandingham <markvanlan@gmail.com>
Prior to this fix the text would be incorrect when the current user reacted and number of reactions was above 2.
This commit fixes the bug and also makes the following changes:
- separates text computation in a standalone lib to make it easier to test
- increases the number of displayed usernames in reaction text (from 5 to 15)
- adds a full test suite for this new `getReactionText` function
- fixes a bug in reaction fabricator which would prevent to change the count to zero
In #22914 we added a fix to stop creating reviewables in the review queue when flagging a chat message and choosing the "notify user" option. By mistake we also stopped creating it when selecting the "something else" option.
This change makes it so a "something else" flag once again creates a reviewable. (Same behaviour as posts.)
- drop @
- prevents +X (participants) to show on next line
- few spacing/fonts adjustments
Note that this commit is also stripping links from chat excerpts.
It will now replies count and participants list. Also the title will be OM excerpt or user defined title, no more default "Thread" title. Lastly, the author of the last reply is also shown as prefix of it.
This could happen after you had already change the separation mode and would cause unexpected bugs.
This PR also adds more tests around using switch buttons with chat.
This fixes the problem reported in
https://meta.discourse.org/t/custom-status-message-in-front-of-by-header-on-scroll/273320.
This problem can be reproduced with any tooltip created using the DTooltip
component or the createDTooltip function.
The problem happens because the trigger for tooltip on mobile is click, and for tooltip
to disappear the user has to click outside the tooltip. This is the default behavior
of tippy.js – the library we use under the hood.
Note that this PR fixes the problem in topics, but not in chat. I'm going to investigate and
address it in chat in a following PR.
To fix it for tooltips created with the createDTooltip function, I had to make a refactoring.
We had a somewhat not ideal solution there, we were leaking an implementation detail
by passing tippy instances to calling sides, so they could then destroy them. With this fix,
I would have to make it more complex, because now we need to also remove onScrool
handlers, and I would need to leak this implementation detail too. So, I firstly refactored
the current solution in 5a4af05 and then added onScroll handlers in fb4aabe.
When refactoring this, I was running locally some temporarily skipped flaky tests. Turned out
they got a bit outdated, so I fixed them. Note that I'm not unskipping them in this commit,
we'll address them separately later.
Prior to this fix we would test by visiting the tab which could create a false positive, as the tab could not be present but we could still access the tab, the implementation and tests have been changed to correctly ensure this.
This is also fixes the issue of chat composer warnings persisting across channels. Currently if you try to mention more groups than is allowed for example, a mention warning pops up. When you change channels the mention warning will not disappear even if there is no text in the composer.
This adds a reset function to the chat-composer-warnings-tracker.js, which is called when the channel is changed and the message is empty. In the event that the message is not empty we call captureMentions to check the loaded drafts' mentions.
This PR would be nicer if the post-send notice used the new chat notices API to publish the mention warnings but we would have to change the existing ones and I thought that would be too much change for this PR. It'd be a good followup though.
This partially reverts 2ecc829.
The problem is that if we don't transform mentions right away,
there is a noticeable lag before a mention gets fully rendered,
while with the transformation, everything is super smooth.
I'm reverting that change only for mentions. Another part was about
category hashtags, but unfortunately they lag both with and without
the transformation. We need to address them separately.
In the past we were only intercepting 429 and 404; it's probably better to surface any error.
There are already tests for the 404 and 429, I consider them enough for now.
