Change styling of filter input & remove button.
This follows the same pattern of design we use for search. In the search dropdown we do not have a button to search. We rely on pressing enter. I've also provided an example of Github's PR filter UI at the bottom of this comment.
We also do not have buttons like this on any other topic-list header. On tag and category dropdowns, we also rely on pressing enter to filter the topic list by chosen categories & tags.
Co-authored-by: Jordan Vidrine <jordan@jordanvidrine.com>
When a category has default_list_filter=none, there were a number of issues which this commit resolves:
1. When using the breadcrumbs to navigate a `default_list_filter=none` category, adding a tag filter would not apply the no-subcategories filter, but the subcategories dropdown would still say 'none'. This commit adjusts `getCategoryAndTagUrl` so that `/none` is added to the URL
2. When landing on `/tags/c/{slug}/{id}/{tag}`, for a default_list_filter=none category, it would include subcategories. This commit introduces a client-side redirect to match the behavior of `/c/{slug}/{id}`
3. When directly navigating to `/c/{slug}/{id}`, it was correctly redirecting to `/c/{slug}/{id}/none`, BUT it was still using the preloaded data for the old route. This has been happening since e7a84948. Prior to that, the preloaded data was discarded and a new JSON request was made to the server. This commit restores that discarding behavior. In future we may want to look into making this more efficient.
System specs are introduced to provide end-end testing of this functionality
* DEV: Change sidebar header dropdown to use wait_for_animation
Introduced in 54351e1b8a, this
helper should remove the need to have to add the .animated
CSS class in JS for the sidebar.
* DEV: Revert spec change
What is the problem?
We have a hidden site setting `show_category_definitions_in_topic_lists`
which is set to false by default. What this means is that category
definition topics are not shown in the topic list by default. Only the
category definition topic for the category being viewed will be shown.
However, we have a bug where we would show that a category has new
topics when a new child category along with its category definition
topic is created even though the topic list does not list the child
category's category definition topic.
What is the fix here?
This commit fixes the problem by shipping down an additional
`is_category_topic` attribute in `TopicTrackingStateItemSerializer` when
the `show_category_definitions_in_topic_lists` site setting has been set
to false. With the new attribute, we can then exclude counting child
categories' category definition topics when counting new and unread
counts for a category.
Small js fix for fast edit to allow posts to save changes when the post contains apostrophes and quotation marks. Replaces unicode characters in text prior to saving the edit.
Includes system tests for fast edit and introduces a new system spec component for fast edit usage.
Fixes issue introduced in 7ef482a292
where the correct warning message was not shown when enabling auto-join
for public categories when creating a channel. Adds more system specs
as well to avoid regressions.
When the `navigation_menu` site setting has been set to `sidebar` or
`header dropdown`, overriding the site setting via the `navigation_menu`
query params did not work.
Follow-up to c47015b861
What does this change do?
This commit the client to override the navigation menu setting
configured by the site temporarily based on the value of the
`navigation_menu` query param. The new query param replaces the old
`enable_sidebar` query param.
Why do we need this change?
The motivation here is to allow theme maintainers to quickly preview
what the site will look like with the various navigation menu site
setting.
Allows users to configure their own custom sidebar sections with links withing Discourse instance. Links can be passed as relative path, for example "/tags" or full URL.
Only path is saved in DB, so when Discourse domain is changed, links will be still valid.
Feature is hidden behind SiteSetting.enable_custom_sidebar_sections. This hidden setting determines the group which members have access to this new feature.
The latter can be called directly from the Topic page object,
so we can remove some duplication between the two. There are
levels of page objects (e.g. entire page, component, complete flow)
and its perfectly valid to call one from another.
