This is a workaround a behavior change in Chromium v97.
The following text was sent to the blink-dev mailing list:
> This change broke a SingleSignOn login on the FOSS software Discourse. We have a flow like:
>
> 1. User visits forum.siteA.com, click login
> 2. Gets redirected to idp.siteB.com
> 3. Fills login details
> 4. Gets redirected to forum.siteA.com/session/sso_login?parameters
> 5. Gets redirected to forum.siteA.com/homepage
>
> On step 4, the response includes a `set-cookie` header, with proper `HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax; Secure `and set. But if there is an active service worker, the login will fail as that cookie will be rejected by Chromium due to SameSite rules now.
>
> t=2971 [st=258] COOKIE_INCLUSION_STATUS
> --> domain = "forum.siteA.com"
> --> name = "_t"
> --> operation = "store"
> --> path = "/"
> --> status = "EXCLUDE_SAMESITE_LAX, DO_NOT_WARN"
>
> The service worker is a vanilla WorkboxJS service worker that intercepts all GETs with the "Network First" strategy.
>
> Disabling the service worker or using Firefox results in a successful login. There is no warning in either DevTools network tab nor the console that the cookie was rejected.
>
> Chrome 96: login works
> Chrome 97: login does not work
> Chrome 98: login does not work
>
> Is this expected behavior? Even if the request `GET forum.siteA.com` was initiated because of a redirect from a different domain, is it expected that Chrome will silently drop same site cookies from forum.siteA.com?
Co-authored-by: Rafael dos Santos Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 2c7906999a.
The changes break some things in local development (putting JS files
into minified files, not allowing debugger, and others)
This is a workaround a behavior change in Chromium v97.
The following text was sent to the blink-dev mailing list:
> This change broke a SingleSignOn login on the FOSS software Discourse. We have a flow like:
>
> 1. User visits forum.siteA.com, click login
> 2. Gets redirected to idp.siteB.com
> 3. Fills login details
> 4. Gets redirected to forum.siteA.com/session/sso_login?parameters
> 5. Gets redirected to forum.siteA.com/homepage
>
> On step 4, the response includes a `set-cookie` header, with proper `HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax; Secure `and set. But if there is an active service worker, the login will fail as that cookie will be rejected by Chromium due to SameSite rules now.
>
> t=2971 [st=258] COOKIE_INCLUSION_STATUS
> --> domain = "forum.siteA.com"
> --> name = "_t"
> --> operation = "store"
> --> path = "/"
> --> status = "EXCLUDE_SAMESITE_LAX, DO_NOT_WARN"
>
> The service worker is a vanilla WorkboxJS service worker that intercepts all GETs with the "Network First" strategy.
>
> Disabling the service worker or using Firefox results in a successful login. There is no warning in either DevTools network tab nor the console that the cookie was rejected.
>
> Chrome 96: login works
> Chrome 97: login does not work
> Chrome 98: login does not work
>
> Is this expected behavior? Even if the request `GET forum.siteA.com` was initiated because of a redirect from a different domain, is it expected that Chrome will silently drop same site cookies from forum.siteA.com?
Currently when pressing Shift key and hitting Reply button the user
stays on the post they are on and does not get navigated to newly
created topic/PM/reply. This is fine for replies but creates confusion
when composing a new topic/PM.
This commits makes it such that pressing Shift key and Reply button
(or ctrl-shift-enter / cmd-shift-enter) works only for replies and not
for new topic/PM. The user will always be navigated to new topic/PM.
This means that our DiscourseURL logic will work consistently in tests, where `window.location` doesn't get updated.
To make it work properly, our `replaceState` implementation needed to be updated so that it writes the new URL to Ember's router, rather than bypassing the router and going straight to the `location` API.
A couple of tests needed updating following this fix:
- the composer-test was asserting that the new reply should be missing from the DOM... when really it **should** be in the DOM, and this fix to the test environment makes it so
- the topic-test was making a fake topic fixture based on the data from a topic with a different id. This was causing the topic route to get confused, and 'fix' the currentURL. This commit updates it to use a fixture with consistent data.
This commit also removes the feature detection of `window.history`. It's feature-detected within `discourse-location`. Plus, we don't support any browsers without it.
Previously only `<div>one top element</div>` was allowed because we use `firstChild` instead of `children`.
We also want `<div>one</div><div>two</div>` to work with this method.
This reverts commit ea84a82f77.
This is causing problems with `/theme-qunit` on legacy, non-ember-cli production sites. Reverting while we work on a fix
This is quite complex as it means that in production we have to build
Ember CLI test files and allow them to be used by our Rails application.
There is a fair bit of glue we can remove in the future once we move to
Ember CLI completely.
The `plugin:pull_compatible_all` task is intended to take incompatible plugins and downgrade them to an earlier version. Problem is, when running the rake task in development/production environments, the plugins have already been activated. If an incompatible plugin raises an error in `plugin.rb` then the rake task will be unable to start.
This commit centralises our LOAD_PLUGINS detection, adds support for LOAD_PLUGINS=0 in dev/prod, and adds a warning to `plugin:pull_compatible_all` if it's run with plugins enabled.
The `plugin:pull_compatible_all` task is intended to take incompatible plugins and downgrade them to an earlier version. Problem is, when running the rake task in development/production environments, the plugins have already been activated. If an incompatible plugin raises an error in `plugin.rb` then the rake task will be unable to start.
This commit centralises our LOAD_PLUGINS detection, adds support for LOAD_PLUGINS=0 in dev/prod, and adds a warning to `plugin:pull_compatible_all` if it's run with plugins enabled.
- Update the TOPIC_URL_REGEXP in `lib/url` so that `navigatedToPost` doesn't attempt to handle slug-less URLs. Slugs must contain at least one non-numeric character, so we can use that fact to make the regex more specific. We want slug-less URLs to be routed as a normal Ember transition, so that `topic-by-slug-or-id` can catch them and re-write the URL to include the slug.
- Update the `topic-by-slug-or-id` afterModel to ensure that the Ember router is used to handle the redirect, rather than DiscourseURL. This guarantees that it will function as a redirect (DiscourseURL.routeTo sometimes bypasses the router). This solves the history problem which was worked-around in 27211ee7bb.
- Update routes/topic to recover from aborted transitions gracefully. This means that following an aborted transition, the browser URL continues to be updated with post numbers as the user scrolls down the page.
An admin could search for all screened ip addresses in a block by
using wildcards. 192.168.* returned all IPs in range 192.168.0.0/16.
This feature allows admins to search for a single IP address in all
screened IP blocks. 192.168.0.1 returns all IP blocks that match it,
for example 192.168.0.0/16.
* FEATURE: Remove roll up button for screened IPs
* FIX: Match more specific screened IP address first
The new warnings cover more cases and more accurate. Most of the
warnings will be visible only to staff members because otherwise they
would leak information about user's preferences.
This commit extends the options which can be passed to
`PrettyText.markdown` so that which Markdown-it rules and Discourse
Markdown plugins to be used when rendering a text can be customizable.
Currently, this extension is mainly used by plugins.
Having to load `ip_addr` is confusing especially when that file exists
to monkey patch Ruby's `IpAddr` class. Moving it to our freedom patches
folder which is automatically loaded on initialization.
…after you re-open the modal or select another emoji.
Reason:
Even the most used emoji would be knocked off the list after a while, if you use any emoji outside the recent. Consider the sequence:
✅, 😃, ✅ (from recent), 😀, ✅ (from recent), 😛, ✅ (from recent), 😎, ✅ (from recent), and so on
With the previous logic, the check mark emoji would leave the list, even though it used constantly and (and the time of removal) would the the second most recent used emoji.
---
It doesn't update the list when you use the recent list so that you can click an emoji repeatedly and it doesn't shift from under your mouse cursor.
