Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.
I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
This PR introduces FormKit, a component-based form library designed to simplify form creation and management. This library provides a single `Form` component, various field components, controls, validation mechanisms, and customization options. Additionally, it includes helpers to facilitate testing and writing specifications for forms.
1. **Form Component**:
- The main component that encapsulates form logic and structure.
- Yields various utilities like `Field`, `Submit`, `Alert`, etc.
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
import Form from "discourse/form";
<template>
<Form as |form|>
<form.Field
@name="username"
@title="Username"
@validation="required"
as |field|
>
<field.Input />
</form.Field>
<form.Field @name="age" @title="Age" as |field|>
<field.Input @type="number" />
</form.Field>
<form.Submit />
</Form>
</template>
```
2. **Validation**:
- Built-in validation rules such as `required`, `number`, `length`, and `url`.
- Custom validation callbacks for more complex validation logic.
**Example Usage**:
```javascript
validateUsername(name, value, data, { addError }) {
if (data.bar / 2 === value) {
addError(name, "That's not how maths work.");
}
}
```
```hbs
<form.Field @name="username" @validate={{this.validateUsername}} />
```
3. **Customization**:
- Plugin outlets for extending form functionality.
- Styling capabilities through propagated attributes.
- Custom controls with properties provided by `form` and `field`.
**Example Usage**:
```hbs
<Form class="my-form" as |form|>
<form.Field class="my-field" as |field|>
<MyCustomControl id={{field.id}} @onChange={{field.set}} />
</form.Field>
</Form>
```
4. **Helpers for Testing**:
- Test assertions for form and field validation.
**Example usage**:
```javascript
assert.form().hasErrors("the form shows errors");
assert.form().field("foo").hasValue("bar", "user has set the value");
```
- Helper for interacting with he form
**Example usage**:
```javascript
await formKit().field("foo").fillIn("bar");
```
5. **Page Object for System Specs**:
- Page objects for interacting with forms in system specs.
- Methods for submitting forms, checking alerts, and interacting with fields.
**Example Usage**:
```ruby
form = PageObjects::Components::FormKit.new(".my-form")
form.submit
expect(form).to have_an_alert("message")
```
**Field Interactions**:
```ruby
field = form.field("foo")
expect(field).to have_value("bar")
field.fill_in("bar")
```
6. **Collections handling**:
- A specific component to handle array of objects
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
<Form @data={{hash foo=(array (hash bar=1) (hash bar=2))}} as |form|>
<form.Collection @name="foo" as |collection|>
<collection.Field @name="bar" @title="Bar" as |field|>
<field.Input />
</collection.Field>
</form.Collection>
</Form>
```
Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.
I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
* Removed the link from the title, so the settings can only be accessed via the settings button on the right
* Added an icon to the "Learn more" link to indicate that it opens a new window
* Made various styling adjustments
* FEATURE: Add Filter for Webhook Events by Status
* Fixing multiple issues
* Lint
* Fixing multiple issues
* Change the range of the status for webhook events
This commit introduces the initial UI for the admin config area for the /about page. The UI isn't wired and doesn't do anything yet, but we're going to iterate on it in future commits.
Internal topic: t/128544.
Continued work on moderate flags UI.
In this PR admins are allowed to change the order of flags. The notify user flag is always on top but all other flags can be moved.
This commit removes the `/admin-revamp` routes which were introduced as a part of an experiment to revamp the admin pages. We still want to improve the admin/staff experience, but we're going to do them within the existing `/admin` routes instead of introducing a completely new route.
Our initial efforts to improve the Discourse admin experience is this commit which introduces the foundation for a new subroute `/admin/config` which will house various new pages for configuring Discourse. The first new page (or "config area") will be `/admin/config/about` that will house all the settings and controls for configuring the `/about` page of Discourse.
Internal topic: t/128544
This uses a new nav style with the heirarchy:
```
Breadcrumbs
|- Title
|- Description
|- Third-Level Navigation
```
The navigation bar uses the transparent red-underlined
buttons similar to the user activity page.
Over time all admin pages will use this, but this starts
with the new plugin show page.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ella <ella.estigoy@gmail.com>
We're planning to implement a feature that allows adding required fields for existing users. This PR does some preparatory refactoring to make that possible. There should be no changes to existing behaviour. Just a small update to the admin UI.
Followup 4e7a75a7ec
Several plugins (Gamification, AI) now use the new
plugin show route. Any plugins that are using it can
now redirect to this page via the Settings button in
the plugin list, rather than taking the user to the
old site settings page filtered by category.
This commit introduces the following components:
* DBreadcrumbsContainer - The wrapper template-only component,
which renders all DBreadcrumbsItem components on the page.
* DBreadcrumbsItem - The component that registers a LinkTo
for the breadcrumb trail. The breadcrumb > trail > will
show based on the order these items are rendered on the page.
* BreadcrumbsService - Manages the DBreadcrumbsContainer elements
on the page via DBreadcrumbsContainerModifier.
* DBreadcrumbsContainerModifier - Handles registering DBreadcrumbsContainer
elements with the BreadcrumbsService and deregistering them.
For now, we will only use these breadcrumbs in the admin section
of Discourse, and this initial commit only uses them in admin/plugins.
This is heavily based off of
https://github.com/Bagaar/ember-breadcrumbs,
but will be further modified for our needs.
Recently a bug was introduced when the admin sidebar section was made bold.
When the admin sidebar is disabled, we display the original sidebar in the admin panel. In that case, an incorrect CSS rule is executed.
```CSS
.admin-area .sidebar-wrapper {
background-color: var(--d-sidebar-admin-background);
.sidebar-section-header-text {
font-weight: bold;
}
}
```
Bug in this PR: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/26801
To solve it, a custom CSS class with a panel key was added which will allow granular customisations.
At the moment, there is no way to create a group of related watched words together. If a user needed a set of words to be created together, they'll have to create them individually one at a time.
This change attempts to allow related watched words to be created as a group. The idea here is to have a list of words be tied together via a common `WatchedWordGroup` record. Given a list of words, a `WatchedWordGroup` record is created and assigned to each `WatchedWord` record. The existing WatchedWord creation behaviour remains largely unchanged.
Co-authored-by: Selase Krakani <skrakani@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
In this PR, all references in the UI to the word "`upgrade`" are changed to "`update`". This is to differentiate the update process in self-hosted sites from the plan "upgrade" process in hosted sites.
Follow-up to the PR: https://github.com/discourse/docker_manager/pull/208
Why this change?
Before this change, the validation error message shown to the user when
saving a theme objects setting is very cryptic. This commit changes the
validation error messages to be displayed on top of the editor instead.
Note that I don't think this way of displaying is the ideal state we
want to get to but given the time we have this will do for now.
Why this change?
While working on the tag selector for the theme object editor, I
realised that there is an extremely high possibility that users might want to select
more than one tag. By supporting the ability to select more than one
tag, it also means that we get support for a single tag for free as
well.
What does this change do?
1. Change `type: tag` to `type: tags` and support `min` and `max`
validations for `type: tags`.
2. Fix the `<SchemaThemeSetting::Types::Tags>` component to support the
`min` and `max` validations
Why this change?
In our schema, we support the `min_length` and `max_length` validation
rules like so:
```
some_objects_setting
type: objects
schema:
name: some_object
properties:
title:
type: string
validations:
min_length: 1
max_length: 10
```
While the validations used to validate the objects on the server side,
we should also add client side validation for better UX.
This commit changes the API for registering the plugin config
page nav configuration from a server-side to a JS one;
there is no need for it to be server-side.
It also makes some changes to allow for 2 different ways of displaying
navigation for plugin pages, depending on complexity:
* TOP - This is the best mode for simple plugins without a lot of different
custom configuration pages, and it reuses the grey horizontal nav bar
already used for admins.
* SIDEBAR - This is better for more complex plugins; likely this won't
be used in the near future, but it's readily available if needed
There is a new AdminPluginConfigNavManager service too to manage which
plugin the admin is actively viewing, otherwise we would have trouble
hiding the main plugin nav for admins when viewing a single plugin.
Currently, a new sidebar link for what's new and reports is going to the main dashboard page and activates the proper tab.
It might be problematic, especially, when the instance has a lot of problems. In that case, it would be difficult for admin to find reports or what’s new which is rendered at the bottom of the page.
Therefore separate pages for reports and what's new were created.
Reports were moved to a component that is shared between a separate page and the dashboard.
Why this change?
This is a first pass at styling the editor for creating/editing/updating
an objects typed theme setting. Only the desktop view is being
considered at the current moment.
The objects typed theme setting is still behind a feature flag at this moment so there is no need for us to get the styling perfect. The purpose of this PR is to get us to a state which we can quickly iterate with a designer on.
This commit makes it so the site settings filter controls and
the list of settings input editors themselves can be used elsewhere
in the admin UI outside of /admin/site_settings
This allows us to provide more targeted groups of settings in different
UI areas where it makes sense to provide them, such as on plugin pages.
You could open a single page for a plugin where you can see information
about that plugin, change settings, and configure it with custom UIs
in the one place.
In future we will do this in "config areas" for other parts of the
admin UI.
Why this change?
When editing a objects typed theme setting, the input fields which are
rendered should include a description so that the user knows the purpose
of the field which they are changing.
What does this change do?
This change adds support for adding description to each property in the
schema for an object by following a given convention in the locale file.
For a schema like this:
```
objects_setting:
type: objects
schema:
name: section
properties:
name:
type: string
required: true
links:
type: objects
schema:
name: link
properties:
name:
type: string
required: true
validations:
max_length: 20
url:
type: string
```
Description for each property in the object can be added like so:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
objects_setting:
description: <description> for the setting
schema:
properties:
name: <description for the name property>
links:
name: <description for the name property in link>
url: <description for the url property in link>
```
If the a description is not present, the input field will simply not
have an description.
Also note that a description for a theme setting can now be added like
so:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
some_other_setting: <This will be used as the description>
objects_setting:
description: <This will also be used as the description>
```
With the new admin sidebar restructure, we have a link to "Installed plugins". We would like to ensure that when the admin is searching for a plugin name like "akismet" or "automation" this link will be visible. Also when entering the plugins page, related plugins should be highlighted.
