This commit rewrites `DiscourseLogstashLogger` to not be an instance
of `LogstashLogger`. The reason we don't want it to be an instance of
`LogstashLogger` is because we want the new logger to be chained to
Logster's logger which can then pass down useful information like the
request's env and error backtraces which Logster has already gathered.
Note that this commit does not bother to maintain backwards
compatibility and drops the `LOGSTASH_URI` and `UNICORN_LOGSTASH_URI`
ENV variables which were previously used to configure the destination in
which `logstash-logger` would send the logs to. Instead, we introduce
the `ENABLE_LOGSTASH_LOGGER` ENV variable to replace both ENV and remove
the need for the log paths to be specified. Note that the previous
feature was considered experimental as stated in d888d3c54c
and the new feature should be considered experimental as well. The code
may be moved into a plugin in the future.
Fixes the following deprecation warning:
> DEPRECATION WARNING: The `check_pending!` method is deprecated in favor of `check_all_pending!`. The new implementation will loop through all available database configurations and find pending migrations. The prior implementation did not permit this.
Followup to e113eff663
We previously sanitized input for integer site settings
on the server side only, which was a bit confusing when
users would enter e.g. 100.5 and end up with 1005, and
not see this reflected in the UI.
Now that we are using native number inputs for these settings,
we can improve the experience a bit by not allowing `.` or `,`
in the input, because it should be whole numbers only, and
add a step size of 1. All other characters are already prevented
in this native number input.
The old implementation used unnecessary `\r\n` and caused the table generator to incorrectly add extra empty lines.
This commit replaces it with `\n`, fixing the bug
Instead of the deprecated 'min trust level to allow ignore' in order to reduce the number of deprecation notices in the logs.
This tweaks a few serializers so that the 'can_ignore_users?` property is always coming from the server and properly used on the client-side.
SiteSetting.hide_user_profiles_from_public raises a Forbidden, which disallows our after_action: add no index header from triggering.
This fix makes sure that the no index header gets added via before_action instead
The "migration to Glimmer" has been broken out here from #27155 to make the review process less onerous and reduce change risk:
* DEV: migrates most of the widget code to Glimmer in prep for IRV additions
* NB This already incorporates significant amounts of review and feedback from the prior PR.
* NB because there was significant additional feedback relating to older Poll code that I've improved with feedback, there are some additional changes here that are general improvements to the plugin and not specific to IRV nor Glimmer!
* There should be no trace of IRV code here.
Once this is finalised and merged we can continue to progress with #27155.
* FIX: Table Builder editor eradicates column alignment specification
Currently, when you use the table builder to edit an existing table, the table builder does not observe the text-align property of the original table. This results in the original table alignment being lost after editing and reset to no alignment.
This commit fixed this issue
related meta topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/table-builder-editor-eradicates-column-alignment-specification/299577
When tag preference in group and site settings are both used with same default notification level it will break new users signups because it tries to create duplicate records in the tag_users table which can’t happen because we have a unique index set.
If an existing user (John) accepts an invite created by Kenny to a group, John may be seen as invited by Kenny, despite already having an account on the site.
This fix removes the bug by excluding invites that determine the invited_by after the user's creation date. The delay buffer in the query accounts for invites that also create the user at the same time.
Badges can have their associated image uploads deleted. When this happens, any user who has that badge will have their profile page error out.
After this fix, when deleting an upload that's associated with a badge, we nullify the foreign key ID on the badge. This makes the existing safeguard work correctly.
There's currently a race condition in the following spec:
65be7a7880/spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb (L70-L95)
where the form can be saved before the image uploader field has finished uploading the selected image and causing the assertion at line 94 to fail with the following error:
```
Failure/Error: expect(SiteSetting.about_banner_image.sha1).to eq(Upload.generate_digest(image_file))
NoMethodError:
undefined method `sha1' for nil
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_admin_about_config_area_page_the_general_settings_card_can_saves_its_fields_to_their_corresponding_site_settings_312.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
http://localhost:31338/assets/vendor.js 15902:14 "WARNING: uppy needs a unique id, pass one in to the component implementing this mixin"
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb:94:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:513:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:503:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:460:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.23.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
This PR fixes the problem by making the system test wait for the image to finish uploading (with 10 seconds timeout) before carrying out the rest of the system test.
Followup 2f2da72747
When the "Consolidated Pageviews with Browser Detection (Experimental)"
report was introduced, we started counting the original
"page_view_logged_in" and "page_view_anon" ApplicationRequest
data as "Other Pageviews", subtracting
"page_view_anon_browser" and "page_view_logged_in_browser" from
this number.
However we unknowingly automatically started counting these
browser-based page views, which are a subset of the total
"page_view_logged_in" and "page_view_anon" counts, in the
original "Pageviews" report, leading to double counting
which meant that when you looked at the data for each
report side-by-side the data didn't add up.
This commit fixes the issue by not counting the "browser"
pageviews in the Pageviews report, and making the code where
we were only counting certain types of requests for this
report more plain, explicitly stating which types of requests
we want.
When a topic embed is run with either no tags argument or a nil tag argument
this should not affect any existing tags.
Only update topic tags when tags argument is explicitly empty.
Before checking if flags were reordered on the topic page, we need to ensure that the reorder action was finished. To achieve it "saving" CSS is added and removed when AJAX call is completed.
Followup 2f2da72747
This commit moves topic view tracking from happening
every time a Topic is requested, which is susceptible
to inflating numbers of views from web crawlers, to
our request tracker middleware.
In this new location, topic views are only tracked when
the following headers are sent:
* HTTP_DISCOURSE_TRACK_VIEW - This is sent on every page navigation when
clicking around the ember app. We count these as browser page views
because we know it comes from the AJAX call in our app. The topic ID
is extracted from HTTP_DISCOURSE_TRACK_VIEW_TOPIC_ID
* HTTP_DISCOURSE_DEFERRED_TRACK_VIEW - Sent when MessageBus initializes
after first loading the page to count the initial page load view. The
topic ID is extracted from HTTP_DISCOURSE_DEFERRED_TRACK_VIEW.
This will bring topic views more in line with the change we
made to page views in the referenced commit and result in
more realistic topic view counts.
* UX: Add a rake task to monitor progress for long rebakes
When doing mass rebaking, this task will print progress, speed and
expected time to completion (ETC) on a loop. It is meant for rebakes
that take several hours or days.
It will calculate a 10m moving average over the past 6 hours, and print
ETC accordingly.
It also shows Sidekiq stats in case Sidekiq jobs for rebaking were
enqueued separately, instead of using the rebake_posts tasks in this
file (which are 100% synchronous and do not touch Sidekiq at all).
NOTE: only the currently unbaked count at task start time is considered;
this is useful in live communities with lots of traffic, where new posts
might otherwise change the goal posts continuously.
* Satisfy stree
