Followup 4e7a75a7ec
Several plugins (Gamification, AI) now use the new
plugin show route. Any plugins that are using it can
now redirect to this page via the Settings button in
the plugin list, rather than taking the user to the
old site settings page filtered by category.
This commit introduces the following components:
* DBreadcrumbsContainer - The wrapper template-only component,
which renders all DBreadcrumbsItem components on the page.
* DBreadcrumbsItem - The component that registers a LinkTo
for the breadcrumb trail. The breadcrumb > trail > will
show based on the order these items are rendered on the page.
* BreadcrumbsService - Manages the DBreadcrumbsContainer elements
on the page via DBreadcrumbsContainerModifier.
* DBreadcrumbsContainerModifier - Handles registering DBreadcrumbsContainer
elements with the BreadcrumbsService and deregistering them.
For now, we will only use these breadcrumbs in the admin section
of Discourse, and this initial commit only uses them in admin/plugins.
This is heavily based off of
https://github.com/Bagaar/ember-breadcrumbs,
but will be further modified for our needs.
* Simplify config nav link generation to always inject the Settings
tab
* Auto-redirect to the first non-settings config link (if there is one)
when the user lands on /admin/plugins/:plugin_id
* Add `extras` to admin plugin serializer so plugins can add more
data on first load
* Add PikadayCalendar page object for system specs, extracted from the
CalendarDateTimePicker to make it more generic.
Those were all low hanging fruits - all were already glimmer components, so this was mostly merging js and hbs files and adding imports.
(occasionally also adds/fixes class names)
At the moment, there is no way to create a group of related watched words together. If a user needed a set of words to be created together, they'll have to create them individually one at a time.
This change attempts to allow related watched words to be created as a group. The idea here is to have a list of words be tied together via a common `WatchedWordGroup` record. Given a list of words, a `WatchedWordGroup` record is created and assigned to each `WatchedWord` record. The existing WatchedWord creation behaviour remains largely unchanged.
Co-authored-by: Selase Krakani <skrakani@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
Fixes two issues:
- frontend was reloading the page when clicking-to-remove avatar
- backend wasn't allowing resetting the setting by deleting all avatars
When the user sees no results in their admin sidebar query,
we are adding two additional links:
* "Search site settings" - Navigates to the site settings page
with the filter prefilled in the search
* "Admin user list" - Navigates to the user list with the filter
prefilled in the username search
This will bridge the gap until we have a full admin-wide search.
Also make admin site setting search param refresh on filter changes
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
This commit ensures that additional keywords for admin
sidebar links (which are also stored in the admin sidebar state
manager) are translated with I18n, which was discussed
in https://meta.discourse.org/t/introducing-experimental-admin-sidebar-navigation/289281/58?u=martin
This also changes the admin sidebar state manager keywords to
not be a TrackedObject -- this is not necessary as keywords are
only set once, and it was causing rendering issues because
the keywords were being set at the same time they were read.
Finally this adds a "theme" keyword to the "Components" link
because we often refer to components as Theme Components
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
Automatically add `moderators` and `admins` auto groups to specific site settings.
In the new group-based permissions systems, we just want to check the user’s groups since it more accurately reflects reality
Affected settings:
- tag_topic_allowed_groups
- create_tag_allowed_groups
- send_email_messages_allowed_groups
- personal_message_enabled_groups
- here_mention_allowed_groups
- approve_unless_allowed_groups
- approve_new_topics_unless_allowed_groups
- skip_review_media_groups
- email_in_allowed_groups
- create_topic_allowed_groups
- edit_wiki_post_allowed_groups
- edit_post_allowed_groups
- self_wiki_allowed_groups
- flag_post_allowed_groups
- post_links_allowed_groups
- embedded_media_post_allowed_groups
- profile_background_allowed_groups
- user_card_background_allowed_groups
- invite_allowed_groups
- ignore_allowed_groups
- user_api_key_allowed_groups
To add a components link to the sidebar refactoring was required to create unique URLs for themes and components. Before the query param was used. After changes, we have two URLs `/admin/customize/themes` and `/admin/customize/components`.
Include categories when fetching admin/web_hooks and make
'extras' more useful. 'extras' is the mechanism we use to provide
context for rest objects.
However, previously:
* When you fetched many objects, extras was only set on the ResultSet,
not on each object,
* If you need derived data from extras, there wasn't a sensible place to
put this code. Now, you can create an 'ExtrasClass' static field on
your rest model and this class will be used for your extras data,
This commit changes the identifier displayed in the navigation tree of
the theme objects editor from the generic "category 1" to "<category
name>, <category 2 name>" when a property of typed categories is set as
the identifier.
Example:
For the following theme objects schema:
```
some_setting:
type: objects
default: []
schema:
name: <some scheme name>
identifier: list_of_categories
properties:
list_of_categories:
type: categories
```
If the `list_of_categories` property's value has been set to `category
1` and `category 2`, the navigation tree will display `category 1,
category 2` as the text to represent the object in the navigation tree.
This commit changes enum typed theme objects property to be optional.
Previously, an enum typed property is always required but we have found
that this might not be ideal so we want to change it.
Why this change?
For a `typed: objects` theme setting with an enum property, we are
adding a `default` key for `type: enum` fields which will be used
as the default value on the client side.
```
some_objects_setting:
type: objects
schema:
name: field
properties:
enum_field:
type: enum
default: awesome
choices:
- nice
- cool
- awesome
```
Why this change?
Prior to this change, the input fields were not displaying when adding
an object to a objects typed theme setting which has a default value of
`[]`. This is because the `fields` getter was not being recomputed.
Why this change?
Instead of dealing with a generic object for `Theme#settings`, we want
to always be dealing with `ThemeSettings` objects.` Previously, we
converted the generic objects to `ThemeSettings` objects in the theme's
adapter `afterFindAll` function. This is not correct because updating
or saving the theme individual reverted the `Theme#settings` back to an
array of generic object.
To fix this problem, the proper way with our REST models is to overwrite
the static `munge` method and create `ThemeSettings` instances there.
In this PR, all references in the UI to the word "`upgrade`" are changed to "`update`". This is to differentiate the update process in self-hosted sites from the plan "upgrade" process in hosted sites.
Follow-up to the PR: https://github.com/discourse/docker_manager/pull/208
Why this change?
Before this change, the validation error message shown to the user when
saving a theme objects setting is very cryptic. This commit changes the
validation error messages to be displayed on top of the editor instead.
Note that I don't think this way of displaying is the ideal state we
want to get to but given the time we have this will do for now.
Why this change?
In the categories, groups and tags selectors, we were showing a
validation error message when a property that is not required but
has a min validation is empty. In this case, we should not be displaying
the min validation error message because the property is allowed to be
empty.
Why this change?
When adding a new object, we want to switch to the input fields of the
new object instead of just appending the new object to the list of
objects as we believe this is a better UX flow.
Why this change?
The field components to select categories, groups and tags had quite a
bit of logic duplicated between them. This commit refactors the logic
to remove most of the duplication so that we can introduce changes
without having to make the changes in multiple places.
... rather than just the category id.
In order for the user to have selected a category, the category must
have been loaded and it's useful for the category chooser to provide
this fetched category so that it doesn't need to be refetched.
In the future, it would be better to store the categories that the
chooser knows about in local component state, so that the category
doesn't need to be fetched from the id map, but this, at least, puts the
API in place.
Why this change?
This is a follow-up to 86b2e3a.
Basically, we want to allow people to select more than 1 group as well.
What does this change do?
1. Change `type: group` to `type: groups` and support `min` and `max`
validations for `type: groups`.
2. Fix the `<SchemaThemeSetting::Types::Groups>` component to support the
`min` and `max` validations and switch it to use the `<GroupChooser>` component
instead of the `<ComboBoxComponent>` component which previously only supported
selecting a single group.
Why this change?
Prior to this change, the `SchemaThemeSetting::Editor#tree` was creating a
new `Tree` instance which holds instances of `Node`. Both classes
consisted of tracked properties. The problem with this approach is that
when any tracked properties is updated, Ember will revaluate
`SchemaThemeSetting::Editor#tree` and because that method always return
a new instance of `Tree`, it causes the whole navigation tree to
rerender just because on tracked property changed.
This rerendering of the whole navigation tree every time made it hard to
implement simple features like hiding a section in
9baa820d53. Instead of being able to just
declare a tracked property to hide/show a section, we end up with a more
complicated solution.
This commit rewrites `SchemaThemeSetting::Editor` to depend on Ember
components to form the tree structure instead. As needed, each component
in the tree structure can declare its own tracked property as necessary.
Why this change?
In cdba864598, we added support for adding
a description which will be displayed under the input of each property
on the client side.
Currently this convention in the locale file is followed:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
objects_setting:
description: <description> for the setting
schema:
properties:
name: <description for the name property>
links:
name: <description for the name property in link>
url: <description for the url property in link>
```
Since we now want to allow the label to be translated as well, we will
be changing the convention to the following:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
objects_setting:
description: <description> for the setting
schema:
properties:
name:
label: <label for the name property>
description: <description for the name property>
links:
name:
label: <label for the name property>
description: <description for the name property in link>
url:
label: <label for the url property>
description: <description for the url property in link>
```
If the locale file does not provide a `label` key under the property's
name, the client side will just display the property's name as the
label for the input field.
Descriptions for the `category-list`, `file-size-restriction` and `file-types-list` site/theme settings aren't rendered due to a bug that was introduced when those components were migrated to Glimmer components. This commit fixes the bug which is that arguments passed to .gjs components should be accessed as `@argument` and not `this.arugment` inside the `<template>` tag.
Why this change?
This is a follow-up to 86b2e3aa3e.
Basically, we want to allow people to select more than 1 category as well.
What does this change do?
1. Change `type: category` to `type: categories` and support `min` and `max`
validations for `type: categories`.
2. Fix the `<SchemaThemeSetting::Types::Categories>` component to support the
`min` and `max` validations and switch it to use the `<CategorySelector>` component
instead of the `<CategoryChooser>` component which only supports selecting one category.
Why this change?
Previously, we were preloading the necessary metadata for
`adminCustomizeThemes.show.schema` route in the
`adminCustomizeThemes.show` route. This is wasteful because we're
loading data upfront when the objects setting editor may not be used.
This change also lays the ground work for a future commit where we need
to be shipping down additional metadata which may further add to the
payload.
Why this change?
When a property of `type: tags` is required, we should be displaying the
"at least 1 tag is required" validation error message when there are no
tags selected in the `TagChooser` compoment. However, we were passing
`this.min` as the `count` attribute when generating the translation
string which is incorrect as `this.min` is not always set.
Why this change?
While working on the tag selector for the theme object editor, I
realised that there is an extremely high possibility that users might want to select
more than one tag. By supporting the ability to select more than one
tag, it also means that we get support for a single tag for free as
well.
What does this change do?
1. Change `type: tag` to `type: tags` and support `min` and `max`
validations for `type: tags`.
2. Fix the `<SchemaThemeSetting::Types::Tags>` component to support the
`min` and `max` validations
Why this change?
Prior to this change, the category selector was not clearable and did
not allow a none value. This is incorrect as the category selector
should be clearable and should allow a none value when the property is
not required.
Why this change?
Prior to this change, the group selector was using the `<GroupChooser>`
component which is a `<MultiSelectComponent>` and is not ideal in our
situation when we only allow a single group to be selected.
The other problem is that we are doing an async load of the groups when
it is already loaded and available in the `Site` service.
Why this change?
This is a continuation of a30d73f255
In our schema, we support the `min` and `max` validation
rules like so:
```
some_objects_setting
type: objects
schema:
name: some_object
properties:
id:
type: float
validations:
min: 5
max: 10
```
While the validations used to validate the objects on the server side,
we should also add client side validation for better UX.
What does this change do?
Since the integer and float input fields share very very similar logic
in the component. This commit pulls the common logic into
`admin/components/schema-theme-setting/number-field.gjs` which
`admin/components/schema-theme-setting/types/integer.gjs` and `admin/components/schema-theme-setting/types/float.gjs`
will inherit from.
Why this change?
This is a continuation of 8de869630f.
In our schema, we support the `min` and `max` validation
rules like so:
```
some_objects_setting
type: objects
schema:
name: some_object
properties:
id:
type: integer
validations:
min: 5
max: 10
```
While the validations used to validate the objects on the server side,
we should also add client side validation for better UX.
Why this change?
In our schema, we support the `min_length` and `max_length` validation
rules like so:
```
some_objects_setting
type: objects
schema:
name: some_object
properties:
title:
type: string
validations:
min_length: 1
max_length: 10
```
While the validations used to validate the objects on the server side,
we should also add client side validation for better UX.
This commit changes the API for registering the plugin config
page nav configuration from a server-side to a JS one;
there is no need for it to be server-side.
It also makes some changes to allow for 2 different ways of displaying
navigation for plugin pages, depending on complexity:
* TOP - This is the best mode for simple plugins without a lot of different
custom configuration pages, and it reuses the grey horizontal nav bar
already used for admins.
* SIDEBAR - This is better for more complex plugins; likely this won't
be used in the near future, but it's readily available if needed
There is a new AdminPluginConfigNavManager service too to manage which
plugin the admin is actively viewing, otherwise we would have trouble
hiding the main plugin nav for admins when viewing a single plugin.
