Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jan Cernik
234133bd3b
UX: Split hide_profile_and_presence user option (#29632)
It splits the hide_profile_and_presence user option and the default_hide_profile_and_presence site setting for more granular control. It keeps the option to hide the profile under /u/username/preferences/interface and adds the presence toggle in the quick user menu.

Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
2024-11-12 22:22:58 -03:00
Osama Sayegh
280adda09c
FEATURE: Support designating multiple groups as mods on category (#28655)
Currently, categories support designating only 1 group as a moderation group on the category. This commit removes the one group limitation and makes it possible to designate multiple groups as mods on a category.

Internal topic: t/124648.
2024-09-04 04:38:46 +03:00
Martin Brennan
a57280cb17
DEV: Change min_trust_level_to_allow_profile_background to trust level setting (#25721)
New setting name is profile_background_allowed_groups

c.f. https://meta.discourse.org/t/changes-coming-to-settings-for-giving-access-to-features-from-trust-levels-to-groups/283408
2024-02-19 10:47:47 +10:00
Arpit Jalan
badc390ebe
FEATURE: allow disabling user activity tab for non admin users (#25540)
* FEATURE: allow disabling user activity tab for non admin users

* add another test case
2024-02-05 14:30:36 +05:30
Ted Johansson
f0a46f8b6f
DEV: Automatically update groups for test users with explicit TL (#25415)
For performance reasons we don't automatically add fabricated users to trust level auto-groups. However, when explicitly passing a trust level to the fabricator, in 99% of cases it means that trust level is relevant for the test, and we need the groups.

This change makes it so that when a trust level is explicitly passed to the fabricator, the auto-groups are refreshed. There's no longer a need to also pass refresh_auto_groups: true, which means clearer tests, fewer mistakes, and less confusion.
2024-01-29 17:52:02 +08:00
Ted Johansson
53d40672a7
DEV: Convert min_trust_level_to_allow_user_card_background to groups (#24891)
We're changing the implementation of trust levels to use groups. Part of this is to have site settings that reference trust levels use groups instead. It converts the min_trust_level_to_allow_user_card_background site setting to user_card_background_allowed_groups.

Nothing of note here. This is used in exactly one place, and there's no fallout.
2023-12-14 10:57:58 +08:00
Daniel Waterworth
6e161d3e75
DEV: Allow fab! without block (#24314)
The most common thing that we do with fab! is:

    fab!(:thing) { Fabricate(:thing) }

This commit adds a shorthand for this which is just simply:

    fab!(:thing)

i.e. If you omit the block, then, by default, you'll get a `Fabricate`d object using the fabricator of the same name.
2023-11-09 16:47:59 -06:00
Ted Johansson
b50b63808c
DEV: Make Guardian#can_see? default to false for unwatched objects (#20412)
When invoking e.g. `can_see?(Foo.new)`, the guardian checks if there's a method `#can_see_foo?` defined and if so uses that to determine whether the user can see it or not.

When such a method is not defined, the guardian currently returns `true`, but it is probably a better call (pun intended) to make it "safe by default" and return `false` instead. I.e. if you can't explicitly see it, you can't see it at all.

This change makes the change to `Guardian#can_see?` to fall back to `false` if no visibility check method is defined.

For `#can_see_user?` and `#can_see_tag?` we don't have any particular logic that prevents viewing. We previously relied on the implicit `true` value, but since that's now change to `false`, I have explicitly implemented these two methods in `UserGuardian` and `TagGuardian` modules. If in the future we want to add some logic for it, this would be the place.

To be clear, **the behaviour remains the same**, but the `true` value is now explicit rather than implicit.
2023-02-24 15:57:01 +08:00
David Taylor
cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to spec/* 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Loïc Guitaut
3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Phil Pirozhkov
493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
David Taylor
c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Jarek Radosz
45cc16098d
DEV: Move spec/components to spec/lib (#15987)
Lib specs were inexplicably split into two directories (`lib` and `components`)

This moves them all into `lib`.
2022-02-18 19:41:54 +01:00