Commit Graph

68 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Waterworth
6e161d3e75
DEV: Allow fab! without block (#24314)
The most common thing that we do with fab! is:

    fab!(:thing) { Fabricate(:thing) }

This commit adds a shorthand for this which is just simply:

    fab!(:thing)

i.e. If you omit the block, then, by default, you'll get a `Fabricate`d object using the fabricator of the same name.
2023-11-09 16:47:59 -06:00
Martin Brennan
6286e790b2
DEV: Remove unread_private_messages and deprecation (#22893)
This was added all the way back in 2020 in b79ea986ac,
enough time has passed, we can delete this now.
2023-08-01 14:44:39 +10:00
Jarek Radosz
dae3970bad
DEV: Fix random typos (#22078)
Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>
2023-06-13 22:02:21 +02:00
David Taylor
cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to spec/* 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
2e655f8311
FEATURE: deprioritize like notifications on all list (#19029)
On the all notifications list, likes should be deprioritized and marked as read.
2022-11-16 13:32:05 +11:00
Osama Sayegh
1fa21ed415
DEV: Prioritize unread notifications in the experimental user menu (#18216)
Right now the experimental user menu sorts notifications the same way that the old menu does: unread high-priority notifications are shown first in reverse-chronological order followed by everything else also in reverse-chronological order. However, since the experimental user menu has dedicated tabs for some notification types and each tab displays a badge with the count of unread notifications in the tab, we feel like it makes sense to change how notifications are sorted in the experimental user menu to this:

1. unread high-priority notifications
2. unread regular notifications
3. all read notifications (both high-priority and regular)
4. within each group, notifications are sorted in reverse-chronological order (i.e. newest is shown first).

This new sorting logic applies to all tabs in the experimental user menu, however it doesn't change anything in the old menu. With this change, if a tab in the experimental user menu shows an unread notification badge for a really old notification, it will be surfaced to the top and prevents confusing scenarios where a user sees an unread notification badge on a tab, but the tab doesn't show the unread notification because it's too old to make it to the list.

Internal topic: t72199.
2022-09-12 21:19:25 +03:00
Loïc Guitaut
3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Phil Pirozhkov
493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
Loïc Guitaut
91b6b5eee7 DEV: Don’t use change { … }.by(0) in specs 2022-07-26 10:34:15 +02:00
Mark VanLandingham
b974375239
DEV: Skip notifications without topic_id in ensure_consistency (#16299) 2022-03-30 09:56:35 -05:00
Rafael dos Santos Silva
100a84d345
DEV: Reserve assigned notification type (#16207)
* DEV: Reserve assigned notification type

* update constants
2022-03-16 17:08:10 -03:00
David Taylor
c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Daniel Waterworth
5ff0b86b57
PERF: Make tests faster by prefabricating more things (#15392) 2021-12-22 11:09:43 -06:00
Daniel Waterworth
102fa71ef3
PERF: Speed up the tests by pre-fabricating more things (#15318) 2021-12-15 11:41:14 -06:00
Roman Rizzi
1fc06520bd
REFACTOR: Improve support for consolidating notifications. (#14904)
* REFACTOR: Improve support for consolidating notifications.

Before this commit, we didn't have a single way of consolidating notifications. For notifications like group summaries, we manually removed old ones before creating a new one. On the other hand, we used an after_create callback for likes and group membership requests, which caused unnecessary work, as we need to delete the record we created to replace it with a consolidated one.

We now have all the consolidation rules centralized in a single place: the consolidation planner class. Other parts of the app looking to create a consolidable notification can do so by calling Notification#consolidate_or_save!, instead of the default Notification#create! method.

Finally, we added two more rules: one for re-using existing group summaries and another for deleting duplicated dashboard problems PMs notifications when the user is tracking the moderator's inbox. Setting the threshold to one forces the planner to apply this rule every time.

I plan to add plugin support for adding custom rules in another PR to keep this one relatively small.

* DEV: Introduces a plugin API for consolidating notifications.

This commit removes the `Notification#filter_by_consolidation_data` scope since plugins could have to define their criteria. The Plan class now receives two blocks, one to query for an already consolidated notification, which we'll try to update, and another to query for existing ones to consolidate.

It also receives a consolidation window, which accepts an ActiveSupport::Duration object, and filter notifications created since that value.
2021-11-30 13:36:14 -03:00
Martin Brennan
8a3ab1cc43
DEV: Fix spec (#15036)
Broken by 9f8ee8f137
2021-11-22 15:59:10 +11:00
Mark VanLandingham
68bb7c5a66
DEV: Support translated title in desktop/notifications (#14325) 2021-09-14 09:57:38 -05:00
Mark VanLandingham
80950d7b28
DEV: Add chat_mention notification type (#13784) 2021-07-19 14:52:12 -05:00
Josh Soref
59097b207f
DEV: Correct typos and spelling mistakes (#12812)
Over the years we accrued many spelling mistakes in the code base. 

This PR attempts to fix spelling mistakes and typos in all areas of the code that are extremely safe to change 

- comments
- test descriptions
- other low risk areas
2021-05-21 11:43:47 +10:00
Mark VanLandingham
809274fe0d
DEV: Replace 'processed' column on notifications with new table (#11864) 2021-01-27 10:29:24 -06:00
Mark VanLandingham
4601f3be7e
FEATURE: Send notification emails when users leave do not disturb mode (#11643) 2021-01-07 10:49:49 -06:00
Mark VanLandingham
649ed24bb4
FEATURE: Do not disturb (#11484) 2020-12-18 09:03:51 -06:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
dde3d63b33
DEV: adds event_reminder (27) and event_invitation (28) (#10473)
Note that these events are also added to the list of events sent to push notifications.
2020-08-19 12:07:51 +02:00
Martin Brennan
37be2958f7
DEV: Allow specifying if a notification is high_priority on create (#9660)
This allows for special cases where we may not want a certain notification type to ALWAYS be high priority (e.g. a topic timer).
2020-05-07 14:35:32 +10:00
Martin Brennan
b79ea986ac
FEATURE: High priority bookmark reminder notifications (#9290)
Introduce the concept of "high priority notifications" which include PM and bookmark reminder notifications. Now bookmark reminder notifications act in the same way as PM notifications (float to top of recent list, show in the green bubble) and most instances of unread_private_messages in the UI have been replaced with unread_high_priority_notifications.

The user email digest is changed to just have a section about unread high priority notifications, the unread PM section has been removed.

A high_priority boolean column has been added to the Notification table and relevant indices added to account for it.

unread_private_messages has been kept on the User model purely for backwards compat, but now just returns unread_high_priority_notifications count so this may cause some inconsistencies in the UI.
2020-04-01 09:09:20 +10:00
Sam Saffron
372f6f4f22
FEATURE: limit number of notifications per user to 10,000
Introduces a new site setting `max_notifications_per_user`.

Out-of-the-box this is set to 10,000. If a user exceeds this number of
notifications, we will delete the oldest notifications keeping only 10,000.

To disable this safeguard set the setting to 0.

Enforcement happens weekly.

This is in place to protect the system from pathological states where a
single user has enormous amounts of notifications causing various queries
to time out. In practice nobody looks back more than a few hundred notifications.
2020-02-24 11:42:50 +11:00
Dan Ungureanu
9aeb9f0ca1
DEV: Add test (#8960)
Follow-up to 3ad07aacfa.
2020-02-14 10:19:40 +02:00
Vinoth Kannan
e6dfcda0bc DEV: handle all notification consolidations in new 'NotificationConsolidator' class.
481c8314f0
2019-12-05 14:36:06 +05:30
Vinoth Kannan
481c8314f0 FEATURE: consolidate group membership request notifications. 2019-11-28 04:02:35 +05:30
Dan Ungureanu
ceb74bef8f
DEV: Add test.
Follow-up to 2f54dd5e3d.
2019-10-21 21:33:58 +03:00
Daniel Waterworth
bf7594b327 More prefabrication 2019-05-10 08:34:04 -04:00
Sam Saffron
4ea21fa2d0 DEV: use #frozen_string_literal: true on all spec
This change both speeds up specs (less strings to allocate) and helps catch
cases where methods in Discourse are mutating inputs.

Overall we will be migrating everything to use #frozen_string_literal: true
it will take a while, but this is the first and safest move in this direction
2019-04-30 10:27:42 +10:00
Robin Ward
b58867b6e9 FEATURE: New 'Reviewable' model to make reviewable items generic
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.

Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
2019-03-28 12:45:10 -04:00
Guo Xiang Tan
aa2cc4ab31 FIX: Liked notification consolidation has to account for user like frequency setting. 2019-01-17 14:33:23 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan
f06b773d25 FIX: Don't show liked consolidated notification when frequency is never. 2019-01-16 17:08:59 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan
ebe65577ed
FEATURE: Consolidate likes notifications. (#6879) 2019-01-16 10:40:16 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan
77d4c4d8dc Fix all the errors to get our tests green on Rails 5.1. 2017-09-25 13:48:58 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan
5012d46cbd Add rubocop to our build. (#5004) 2017-07-28 10:20:09 +09:00
Guo Xiang Tan
e888369f51 UX: Don't send emails for discobot notifications. 2017-06-12 17:00:27 +09:00
Guo Xiang Tan
6057e17ae7 Fix weird test failure. 2017-03-20 12:06:37 +08:00
Sam
c531f4ded5 remove rails-observers
Rails yanked out observers many many years ago, instead the functionality
was yanked out to a gem that is very lightly maintained.

For example: if we want to upgrade to rails 5 there is no published gem

Internally the usage of observers had quite a few problem.

The series of refactors renamed a bunch of classes to give us more clarity
and removed some magic.
2016-12-22 16:46:53 +11:00
Sam
019f1a1d06 UserEmailObserver is now removed
no big surprises here was pretty straightforward

after_commit semantics sure are weird though
2016-12-22 16:46:53 +11:00
Sam
d09a20210b correct bad spec 2016-03-22 14:50:12 +11:00
Régis Hanol
12051f79a8 FIX: don't send empty email notifications for small_actions 2016-02-01 19:12:10 +01:00
Arpit Jalan
97e4f7f6d3 Enums that are used in tables need to be stable 2016-01-08 20:43:11 +05:30
Guo Xiang Tan
cca0896b9e FIX: Update all does not trigger callbacks. 2015-12-17 00:07:04 +08:00
Andy Waite
3e50313fdc Prepare for separation of RSpec helper files
Since rspec-rails 3, the default installation creates two helper files:
* `spec_helper.rb`
* `rails_helper.rb`

`spec_helper.rb` is intended as a way of running specs that do not
require Rails, whereas `rails_helper.rb` loads Rails (as Discourse's
current `spec_helper.rb` does).

For more information:

https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/upgrade#default-helper-files

In this commit, I've simply replaced all instances of `spec_helper` with
`rails_helper`, and renamed the original `spec_helper.rb`.

This brings the Discourse project closer to the standard usage of RSpec
in a Rails app.

At present, every spec relies on loading Rails, but there are likely
many that don't need to. In a future pull request, I hope to introduce a
separate, minimal `spec_helper.rb` which can be used in tests which
don't rely on Rails.
2015-12-01 20:39:42 +00:00
Sam
9f88d6e252 fix regression in visible notification detection 2015-06-23 06:14:22 +10:00
Sam
709ab731c7 don't put missing notifications in the stream for tests. 2015-02-19 13:20:25 +11:00
Luciano Sousa
b52f12948a models with rspec3 syntax 2015-01-05 13:04:23 -03:00