Followup from 9953a6edd9,
which broke an issue fixed in e8d6277062.
In the refactor we did not update the place where we resync
channel tracking based on onPresenceChange to use the new
tracking object we added to the serializer, and to directly
update channel.tracking
We had safe-area-inset-bottom still set at a wrong place which was causing issues but was also useful to some cases. This commit removes it and ensures the affected cases are corrected.
This is only the first steps of a redesign
- redesigns the buttons to have a larger hitzone
- generally bigger composer
- clicking near textarea focuses the input
- relies on the fact that safe-area-inset-bottom is set globally and doesn’t need to be set in sub components
This moves chat tracking state calculation for channels
and threads into a central Chat::TrackingStateManager service, that
serves a similar purpose to the TopicTrackingState model
in core.
This service calls down to these query classes:
* ThreadUnreadsQuery
* ChannelUnreadsQuery
To get the unread_count and mention_count for the appropriate
channels and threads.
As well as this, this commit refactors the client-side chat
tracking state.
Now, there is a central ChatTrackingStateManager Ember Service
so all tracking is accessible and can be counted from one place,
which can also initialize tracking from an initial payload.
The actual tracking counts are now maintained in a ChatTrackingState
class that is initialized on the `.tracking` property of both channel and
thread objects.
This removes the attributes on UserChatChannelMembership and decoration
of said membership from ChannelFetcher, preferring instead to have an additional
object for tracking in the JSON.
* DEV: add new thread icon
* FIX: Use new thread icon, fix typo in SVG
UX: move the thread list icon to the right of
the collapse button
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
This commit also removes safe-area-inset-bottom when keyboard is displayed to avoid having a taller than needed space between composer and replying indicator.
Before this commit chat was applying a fixed height on everything under the `/chat` route. It's only really needed on the channel page with the composer at the bottom of the page.
This commits makes the following changes:
- moves height limitation from `#main-outlet-wrapper` to `.chat-channel`
- makes browse channel page and members list page full height and rely on main document scrollbar
- adds height computation for draft header and direct message creator block to ensure the height is correct when creating a draft channel
- makes chat index full height to rely on the browser scrollbar. As a result the <kbd> + </kbd> button used on mobile to create a direct message as been moved out of `<ChannelsList>` into the chat index template
- sidebar height was relying on chat setting a max height, as a result the height computation of sidebar has been changed to work correctly, especially with an opened keyboard on mobile or ipad
Hard to write a test for this behavior, this is a micro optimisation which doesn’t change the behavior but only makes it smoother by happening right before async request.
The failure screenshot shows the message is on screen while the error is:
```
Failure/Error: example.run
expected to find text "My favorite message" in "Community\nEverything\nMy Posts\nMore\nMessages\nInbox\nChannels\nPolitics 1\nPersonal chat\nPolitics 1". (However, it was found 1 time including non-visible text.)
```
I expect the arrow element might e slightly hiding the link, but not 100% sure of this.
When using `navigator.virtualKeyboard.overlaysContent = false` we can rely on using only the resize event. Also attempts to no over trigger `setProperty` when value didn't change.
A follow-up to 54b2a85b. That commit didn't fix the issue because the to_notify hash that we return from the notify_edit method isn't used anywhere apart from tests (that's confusing, we're going to fix that soon).
This issue was for example possibly causing the last visit indicator to be reset by `sent` messages events.
The following was happening:
- a user (bob) had a last message bus ID of 1 on a channel (id:1) subscription
- bob then go to another channel (id:2), unsubscribing from updates of channel (id:1)
- another user (laura) then send messages to channel (id:1)
- bob goes back to channel (id:1)
At this point we we doing in the same sequence:
- loading channel with messages, getting a new last message bus id
- subscribing to updates using the last known message bus id
Most of the times we were lucky enough for this to work (no events while away, or just got the new id in time...) but it was also very likely to do a double fetch of messages as MessageBus would think we were late.
A chat message may be restored later, so we shouldn't be deleting `chat_mentions` records for it.
But we still have to remove notifications (see 082cd139).
This commit fixes the shift+click multi selection in threads. We were not correctly using the manager of the message and would attempt to find messages in the channel instead of the thread.
The `activeThread` was also not correctly set sometimes.
Also adds tests for message selection in threads.
In the past, we create a `chat_mention` records only when we wanted to notify a user about a mention. Since we don't send notifications when a user mentioning himself, we didn't create a `chat_mention` records in those cases.
Now we use `chat_mentions` records in other scenarios too, so when a user is mentioning himself we want to:
1. Create a `chat_mention` record for that mention
2. Do not create a notification for that mention
When the user sends a message in a thread, we want to
create a membership for them in the background (default
to notification level of Watching) so we can track whether
they have read the thread.
Then, for now since we don't have granular message reading/
scrolling in the thread panel, we just update the thread
last_read_message_id for the user to the latest reply in the
thread when they open the thread panel. This at least will
mark the thread as read.
In future PRs we want to show the blue dot indicator in various
places in the UI for unread threads which will also require
some MessageBus functionality.
This takes into account the same issue fixed for channels
in ae3231e140
We were combining both solutions which was apparently causing issues from chrome 113 on Android at least.
The commit will now use `geometrychange` (android) only when available and fallback to `visualViewport` otherwise (iOS).
This feature adds the replying indicator in threads, it uses the same `/chat-reply/CHANNEL_ID` prefix than the channel composer replying indicator as we don't have specific right on threads ATM (if you can access channel, you can access thread). Thread will however use a presence channel name of the following format: `/chat-reply/CHANNEL_ID/thread/THREAD_ID`
This commit also simplifies the computation of `users` to eventually avoid a race-condition leading to a leak of the indicator in another channel/thread.
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
When setting DISCOURSE_ZEITWERK_EAGER_LOAD=1 to enable
eager loading the previous solution to adding chat_levels
to the core NotificationLevels would break with a module
loading error (c.f. cc2570fce3)
We don't actually _need_ to extend the core class, we can just
make our own for chat, let's do this instead.
This will enable us to begin work on user tracking
state for a thread so we can show thread-specific
unreads and mentions indicators. In this case are following
the core notification_level paradigm rather than the solution
UserChatChannelMembership went with, and eventually we
will want to refactor the other table to match this as well.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Since we have channel message retention which deletes
messages, we can end up with cases where the thread
is still around but the message is deleted. We will
handle the cascade delete in a different commit --
for now we will ensure the thread list lookup handles
this case and doesn't error.
After this change, in order to join a chat channel, a user needs to be in a group with at least “Reply” permission for the category. If the user only has “See” permission, they are able to preview the channel, but not join it or send messages. The auto-join function also follows this new restriction.
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
This commit adds an initial thread list UI. There are several limitations
with this that will be addressed in future PRs:
* There is no MessageBus reactivity, so e.g. if someone edits the original
message of the thread it will not be reflected in the list. However if
the thread title is updated the original message indicator will be updated.
* There is no unread functionality for threads in the list, if new messages
come into the thread there is no indicator in the UI.
* There is no unread indicator on the actual button to open the thread list.
* No pagination.
In saying that, this is the functionality so far:
* We show a list of the 50 threads that the user has most recently participated
in (i.e. sent a message) for the channel in descending order.
* Each thread we show a rich excerpt, the title, and the user who is the OM creator.
* The title is editable by staff and by the OM creator.
* Thread indicators show a title. We also replace emojis in the titles.
* Thread list works in the drawer/mobile.
The spec now checks we are in the state we expect to be before clicking bottom button. The bottom button could show while it's still loading and on slow systems cause failures.
Checking "uploading" string is tricky because it both takes time before showing, and when it will show it will show for a short period of time. I prefer to reduce the surface tested here while still getting some confidence out of it and making the test more reliable.
- do not render sidepanel resizer as it's not usable on mobile
- removes 1px to the bottom spacing, this spacing won't be necessary once we implement chat-replying-indicator for thread
- correctly subscribe/unsubscribe channel
- instantly changes users list
- adds a test for testing channel change
- rewrites tests to be less verbose
- ensures users is always an array
When making the list of users to notify we set `all_mentioned_user_ids` key on the `to_notify` Hash.
This hash will be passed around until the actual moment where we send the notifications:
```ruby
identifier_text =
case identifier_type
when :here_mentions
"@here"
when :global_mentions
"@all"
when :direct_mentions
""
else
"@#{identifier_type}"
end
```
As not found `all_mentioned_user_ids` would end up being sent as `@all_mentioned_user_ids` which is obviously incorrect.
This commit is a direct fix to the issue and will remove the key as soon as we have used it sooner up in the chain.
This bug was reproducible when doing this sequence of events:
- create a message with a direct mention: `@bob hi`
- edit this message into a global mention `@all hi`
Every replies creates a thread, even when threading is disabled. This is how we ensure we can go back and forth. However, a message bus event should only be published when threading is enabled, otherwise frontend will attempt to display a thread which is not possible when disabled.
This fixes a silent background 404 when doing a reply in a direct message channel or a non threading enabled category channel.
This commit also adds a component test for it and fixes a bug in `chat-channel-archive-status` `#getTopicURL` property which was incorrectly called as a function.
What is the problem?
Previously, this was the query used to move change messages into another
channel.
```
INSERT INTO chat_messages(
chat_channel_id, user_id, last_editor_id, message, cooked, cooked_version, created_at, updated_at
)
SELECT :destination_channel_id,
user_id,
last_editor_id,
message,
cooked,
cooked_version,
CLOCK_TIMESTAMP(),
CLOCK_TIMESTAMP()
FROM chat_messages
WHERE id IN (:message_ids)
RETURNING id
```
The problem is that this incorrectly assumes that the insertion will be based on the order of `message_ids`. However, that
is not the case as PostgreSQL provides no such guarantee. Instead we need to explicitly order the messages to ensure
the right order of insertion.
This problem was discovered by a flaky test which exposed the non-guarantee order of insertion.
- `ChatChannel`
- `UserChatChannelMembership`
Also creates a new `chat-direct-message` model used as the object for the`chatable` property of the `ChatChannel` when the `ChatChannel` is a direct message channel. When the chatable is a category a real `Category` object will now be returned.
Archive state of a `ChatChannel` is now hold in a `ChatChannelArchive` object.
After a long time with no activity or hidden browser (2.5 minutes), the app will re-sync the chat user-tracking-state to ensure unreads are synced.
We might also need to couple this later with more recovering logic.
When we were deleting messages in chat, we would find all of
the UserChatChannelMembership records that had a matching
last_read_message_id and set that column to NULL.
This became an issue when multiple users had that deleted message
set to their last_read_message_id. When we called ChannelUnreadsQuery
to get the unread count for each of the user's channels, we were
COALESCing the last_read_message_id and returning 0 if it was NULL,
which meant that the unread count for the channel would be the total
count of the messages not sent by the user in that channel.
This was particularly noticeable for DM channels since we show
the count with the indicator in the header. This issue would disappear
as soon as the user opened the problem channel, because we would then
set the last_read_message_id to an actual ID.
To circumvent this, instead of NULLifying the last_read_message_id in
most cases, it makes more sense to just set it to the most recent
non-deleted chat message ID for the channel. The only time it will
be set to NULL now is when there are no more other messages in the
channel.
We need to create and update `chat_mentions` records for messages earlier. They should be created or updated before we call `Chat::Publisher.publish_new!` `Chat::Publisher.publish_edit!` to send the message to message bus subscribers).
This logic is covered with tests in `message_creator_spec.rb`, `message_updater_spec.rb`, `notifier_spec.rb` and `notify_mentioned_spec.rb`.
See the commits history for steps of refactoring.
Since our recent change of inverting thread scrolling direction it feels more responsive to scroll down in thread panel as soon as message is staged and not after it's actually persisted.
When hovering a thread indicator in a channel we will now append two `<link rel="preload" ...>` to the `<head>` of the document. Clicking on it should be significantly faster.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
This commit implements all the necessary logic to create thread seamlessly. For this it relies on the same logic used for messages and generates a `staged-id`(using the format: `staged-thread-CHANNEL_ID-MESSAGE_ID` which is used to re-conciliate state client sides once the thread has been persisted on the backend.
Part of this change the client side is now always using real thread and channel objects instead of sometimes relying on a flat `threadId` or `channelId`.
This PR also brings three UX changes:
- thread starts from top
- number of buttons on message actions is dependent of the width of the enclosing container
- <kbd>shift + ArrowUp</kbd> will reply to the last message
See e323628d8a for more details.
This commit speeds up the tests by roughly 10 seconds locally where the
default wait time is 2 seconds. On CI, this speeds up the tests by 20
seconds where the default wait time is 4 seconds.
* FIX: Link to thread for mentions inside thread
When mentioning a user in a thread, when we send the
notification and display it in the UI we want the URL
of the notification to point to the thread URL to open
the panel, rather than the main channel which is confusing.
For now, we don't have a way to highlight the linked-to message
in the thread, we can revisit this later.
* FIX: Mark mention notifications read when thread opens
Since we have no scrolling/message visibility/thread membership
for now, when a user opens the thread panel we just want to mark
all mention notifications relating to messages in the thread
for the user as read.
In the past this was happening on scroll so we needed to be very conservative here. Also, if we wait too much theres a visible element flashing so this PR attempts to compute right away, and a second time 100ms later in case the first one happened too early.
It seems more reliable to revert state at the end of the it block. In another PR I noticed that the network state was leaking in other tests when I was reverting in the after block.
Also trashes a suspicious spec.
This will avoid the messages actions floating around while scrolling. Note it's not testing the thread counterpart yet as I have a plan in mind to tests channels and threads in a clean way in the near future.
Before this fix if the underlying model of a reviewable was changed, the filter wouldn't work anymore as it was expecting a 1:1 relation between filter type and model name.
This commit also relies on the `Reviewable.types` array to check against valid types instead of a regex not checking much.
Finally this commit adds a spec to ensure chat reviewables are listable from the review index page.
Prior to this fix uploads event could end up in the wrong textarea. This will most importantly allow pasting an image in the thread composer.
Also fixes a minor padding issue on thread when uploads are associated to it.
`.chat-channel` had `300px` min width, when `.chat-drawer` was `250px`, resulting in overflowing channel when in drawer. This commits ensures the limits are always set at `250px`.
- using BEM notation
- making animation linear instead of default ease
- small tweaks to composer state (disabled/send-disabled/send-enabled)
- fixing bug with disabled composer on mobile
- It seems that `window_opened_by/within_window` it not reliable in our current setup/test
- System specs should avoid at all cost to rely on backend state, any change should be visible one way or another on the front to be properly tested
1. `this.chat.activeChannel = null` was being done in twice
2. using `willTransition()` and checking transition.to.name prefix for route cleanup rather than using `deactivate()` was unnecessarily verbose and could be premature (if something aborted the transition you'd end up in a broken state)
3. `activeChannel` on Chat service can be null, check for that before accessing
It's very hard to repro but under specific circumstances I suspect it was possible for this sequence to happen:
- set message TEXT
- cooking starts
- set message COOKED through another mean (like a message bus)
- the cooking started sooner finished and erases the cooked set at the step before causing the message to have the incorrect cooked
After removing `TextareaTextManipulation` from `ChatComposer` and using `TextareaInteractor` as a proxy, one function has been forgotten: `paste(event)` which is not available in glimmer components anymore, and even less avaiable now that the mixin is not tied to a component anymore but a real DOM node. As a solution we now add a manual paste event listener which will call `paste(event)`.
