This could happen after you had already change the separation mode and would cause unexpected bugs.
This PR also adds more tests around using switch buttons with chat.
Reverts e2705df and re-lands #23187 and #23219.
The issue was incorrect order of execution of Rails' `assets:precompile` task in our own precompilation stack.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
* UX: update styling for related/suggested
This PR fixes styling for previous related/suggested changes' positioning being off for topics and updates the active icon color by removing a line that changed its active color.
Short answer -- the problem is the video thumbnail generator & uploader
code added a couple of months back in f144c64e13.
It was implemented as another Mixin which overrides `this._uppyInstance`
when uploading the video thumbnail after the initial upload is complete,
which means the composer's `this._uppyInstance` value is overridden,
and it loses all of its preprocessors & upload code.
This is generally a problem with the Mixin based architecture that I
used for the Uppy code, which we need to remove at some point and
refacotr.
The most ideal thing to do here would be to convert this video thumbnail
code into an Uppy
[postprocessor](https://uppy.io/docs/uppy/#addpostprocessorfn) plugin,
which runs on each upload after they are complete. I started looking
into this, and the main hurdle here is adding support to tracking the
progress of postprocessors to
[ExtendableUploader](cf42466dea/app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/mixins/extendable-uploader.js)
so that is out of scope at this time.
The fix here makes it so the ComposerVideoThumbnailUppy code is no
longer a Mixin, but acts more like a normal class, a pattern which
we have used in chat. I also clean up a lot of the thumbnail uploader
code and remove some unnecessary things.
Attempted to add a system spec, but video streaming does not work
in Chrome for Testing at this time, and it is needed for the
onloadedmetadata event.
This PR updates the styling for the related & suggested topics to distract less from the Reply buttons and clearly indicate its usage as tabs, also referred to as pills.
`Window`'s `resize` event was unreliable. You could shrink down the browser window so that the timeline would disappear but the progress element would not render to replace it.
This commit makes it rely on a media query listener instead so it 1. matches the css 2. fires only when that query result changes (perf win)
By default, the workbox-expiration plugin will not expire cache entries which include a `Vary` header in the response. This means that cached entries can build up until the browser storage quota is hit.
This commit introduces the `ignoreVary: true` option, so that deletion is performed correctly. This will only apply going forward, so this commit also bumps the cache version and deletes the old caches.
Ref https://github.com/GoogleChrome/workbox/issues/2206
This fixes the problem reported in
https://meta.discourse.org/t/custom-status-message-in-front-of-by-header-on-scroll/273320.
This problem can be reproduced with any tooltip created using the DTooltip
component or the createDTooltip function.
The problem happens because the trigger for tooltip on mobile is click, and for tooltip
to disappear the user has to click outside the tooltip. This is the default behavior
of tippy.js – the library we use under the hood.
Note that this PR fixes the problem in topics, but not in chat. I'm going to investigate and
address it in chat in a following PR.
To fix it for tooltips created with the createDTooltip function, I had to make a refactoring.
We had a somewhat not ideal solution there, we were leaking an implementation detail
by passing tippy instances to calling sides, so they could then destroy them. With this fix,
I would have to make it more complex, because now we need to also remove onScrool
handlers, and I would need to leak this implementation detail too. So, I firstly refactored
the current solution in 5a4af05 and then added onScroll handlers in fb4aabe.
When refactoring this, I was running locally some temporarily skipped flaky tests. Turned out
they got a bit outdated, so I fixed them. Note that I'm not unskipping them in this commit,
we'll address them separately later.
This commit adds some system specs to test uploads with
direct to S3 single and multipart uploads via uppy. This
is done with minio as a local S3 replacement. We are doing
this to catch regressions when uppy dependencies need to
be upgraded or we change uppy upload code, since before
this there was no way to know outside manual testing whether
these changes would cause regressions.
Minio's server lifecycle and the installed binaries are managed
by the https://github.com/discourse/minio_runner gem, though the
binaries are already installed on the discourse_test image we run
GitHub CI from.
These tests will only run in CI unless you specifically use the
CI=1 or RUN_S3_SYSTEM_SPECS=1 env vars.
For a history of experimentation here see https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/22381
Related PRs:
* https://github.com/discourse/minio_runner/pull/1
* https://github.com/discourse/minio_runner/pull/2
* https://github.com/discourse/minio_runner/pull/3
This PR changes how we track which lists are available for a topic and how we decide which is the active one. The new approach centralizes everything in the service, and exposes functions for adding/removing a list, which each calls via `did-insert/will-destroy` modifiers.
It makes it much easier to track and update state when navigated to another topic or PM, ensuring things get updated correctly.
71ff3417 removed the mobile-specific template for discovery/topics. It was noted that this would introduce an additional `<div class='show-more'>` wrapper around the new topic indicator on mobile, but I didn't realise that it would cause positioning problems on mobile.
This commit moves the desktop-specific CSS into the desktop SCSS file so that it does not apply to mobile.
Separate mobile templates are a pattern we're moving away from. They are not supported by Ember, and make things more difficult to develop/test. The differences between the mobile and desktop templates for `discovery/topics` are very minimal, so they can be easily integrated.
The only feature missing from the main template was the new 'list header controls' UI. This commit introduces that to the main template inside an `mobileView` conditional.
Key changes in behavior, many of which could be considered bug fixes, are:
- Mobile will now include 'redirected reason'
- Mobile will now include shared drafts
- Mobile will now include before-topic-list and after-topic-list Plugin Outlets
- Mobile will now have a `<div class="show-more">` wrapper around the 'new or updated' UI, to match desktop. This does not seem to cause any visual change.
Mobile-specific template overrides of `discovery/topics` will continue to function as before - this should not be a breaking change for any themes/plugins.
Mobile-specific templates for the topic list and topic-list-item remain in place.
Sometimes the fuzzy search would return too many site setting results
making it hard to find what you are searching for. This change still
allows for fuzzy searching but tightens up the criteria for being a
fuzzy match.
One example is searching for 'cheer', a term associated with a plugin,
previously returned ~55 search results. With this change it will return
~13 (Actual numbers depend on how many plugins your instance has).
Another example is searching for 'digest'. Previously returned ~37
results and now will return ~14.
Follow up to: e63e193a0a
See also: https://meta.discourse.org/t/276013
Transpiling to `/raw-templates` is important so that they are detected by the `eager-load-raw-templates` initializer. Prior to 16c6ab86 this wasn't a problem because all connector modules were being eager-loaded. Now that connectors are lazily loaded, it's critical that `eager-load-raw-templates` does the eager loading. This problem doesn't affect themes because they compile raw templates into an iife instead of a `define()` module.
Unfortunately we don't have any way to introduce automated testing for this part of our compilation pipeline. However, discourse-calendar will begin depending on this functionality imminently, so its tests will warn us of future regressions.
This commit introduces a 'shortcut' when rendering PluginOutlets which have no registered connectors. On my machine, this improves rendering performance of empty PluginOutlets by around 30-40% (tested by running tachometer on a `/latest` route with 600 plugin outlets).
In most cases, deleting a user from outside the review UI will also delete any pending reviewables for that user. This was not working in some cases, e.g. for reviewables created due to "fast typer" violations.
This was happening because UserDestroyer only automatically resolves flagged posts.
After this change, in addition to existing checks, look for ReviewablePost where the post was created by the user and reject them if present.
* Minor style adjustments
* Removes "all" count because it's redundant to the count on New
* Updates generic class names with -- modifier to follow BEM and help avoid class name collisions
* Hides the toggle when bulk select is enabled (the UI ends up being too busy)
Manipulating theme module paths means that the paths you author are not the ones used at runtime. This can lead to some very unexpected behavior and potential module name clashes. It also meant that the refactor in 16c6ab8661 was unable to correctly match up theme connector js/templates.
While this could technically be a breaking change, I think it is reasonably safe because:
1. Themes are already forced to use relative paths when referencing their own modules (since they're namespaced based on the site-specific id). The only time this might be problematic is when theme tests reference modules in the theme's main `javascripts` directory
2. For things like components/services/controllers/etc. our custom Ember resolver works backwards from the end of the path, so adding `discourse/` in the middle will not affect resolution.
This is a bug that happens only when the current date is less than 90 days from a date on which the time zone transitions into or out of Daylight Savings Time.
In these conditions, bulk invites show the time of day of their expiration as being 1 hour later than the current time.
Whereas it should match the time of day the invite was generated.
This is because the server has not been using the user's timezone in calculating the expiration time of day. This PR fixes issue by considering the user's timezone when doing the date math.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/bulk-invite-logic-to-generate-expire-date-bug/274689
`ReviewableQueuedPost` got refactored a while back to use the more
appropriate `target_created_by` for the user of the post being queued
instead of `created_by`. The change was not extended to the `DELETE
/review/:id` endpoint leading to error responses for a user attempting
to deleting their own queued post.
This fix extends the `Reviewable` lookup implementation in
`ReviewablesController#destroy` and Guardian implementation to account
for this change.
Previously we were discovering plugin outlets by checking first for dedicated template files, and then looking for classes to match them. This doesn't work for components which are entirely defined in JS (e.g. those authored with gjs, or those which are re-exports of a colocated component).
This commit refactors our detection logic to look for both class and template modules in a single pass. It also refactors things so that the modules themselves are required lazily when needd, rather than all being loaded during app boot.
This PR adds a new toggle to switch the (new) /new list between showing topics with new replies (a.k.a unread topics), new topics, or everything mixed together.
When hiding a post (essentially updating hidden, hidden_at, and hidden_reason_id) our callbacks are running the whole battery of post validations. This can cause the hiding to fail in a number of edge cases. The issue is similar to the one fixed in #11680, but applies to all post validations, none of which should apply when hiding a post.
After some code reading and discussion, none of the validations in PostValidator seem to be relevant when hiding posts, so instead of just skipping unique check, we skip all post validator checks.
