This adds a new table UserNotificationSchedules which stores monday-friday start and ends times that each user would like to receive notifications (with a Boolean enabled to remove the use of the schedule). There is then a background job that runs every day and creates do_not_disturb_timings for each user with an enabled notification schedule. The job schedules timings 2 days in advance. The job is designed so that it can be run at any point in time, and it will not create duplicate records.
When a users saves their notification schedule, the schedule processing service will run and schedule do_not_disturb_timings. If the user should be in DND due to their schedule, the user will immediately be put in DND (message bus publishes this state).
The UI for a user's notification schedule is in user -> preferences -> notifications. By default every day is 8am - 5pm when first enabled.
This should make it easier to track down how the incoming email was created, which is one of four locations:
The POP3 poller (which picks up reply via email replies)
The admin email controller #handle_mail (which is where hosted mail is sent)
The IMAP sync tool
The group SMTP mailer, which sends emails when replying to IMAP topics, pre-emptively creating IncomingEmail records to avoid double syncing
Feature for `Must Approve Users` setup. When a user is rejected, a staff member can optionally set a reason for audit purposes. In addition, feedback email can be sent to the user.
Meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/account-rejection-email/103112/8
This PR adds functionality for the IMAP sync code to detect if a UID that is missing from the mail group mailbox is in the Spam/Junk folder for the mail account, and if so delete the associated Discourse topic. This is identical to what we do for emails that are moved for Trash.
If an email is missing but not in Spam or Trash, then we mark the incoming email record with imap_missing: true. This may be used in future to further filter or identify these emails, and perhaps go hunting for them in the email account in bulk.
Note: This adds some code duplication because the trash and spam email detection and handling is very similar. I intend to do more refactors/improvements to the IMAP sync code in time because there is a lot of room for improvement.
These 2 indexes optimise performance on profile pages.
The summary page displays:
1. A list of "Top Link" - links sorted by number of clicks posted by user
2. A list of "Top Replies" - replies made by a user that go the most hearts
These two areas could devolve into full index or table scans, new indexes are there to avoid this cost on large dbs
One minor downside is that storage requirements go a tiny bit up to maintain the new indexes
There have been production instances where the migrations has run but the records
that were meant to be deleted have not been deleted. The root cause is
unknown but the migration is safe and simple to re-run. The problem is
not reproducible locally so we're not spending too much time on digging
up the root. Time vs business cost tradeoff.
Follow-up fb15da43da
This will only happen if the user_associated_accounts table is currently empty. It's useful for people that may be depending on primary key values in data explorer queries. This change will only have an effect on sites which have not already run this migration.
Themes marked for auto update will be automatically updated when
Discourse is updated. This is triggered by discourse_docker or
docker_manager running Rake task 'themes:update'.
* FIX: Store Reviewable's force_review as a boolean.
Using the `force_review` flag raises the score to hit the minimum visibility threshold. This strategy turned out to be ineffective on sites with a high number of flags, where these values could rapidly fluctuate.
This change adds a `force_review` column on the reviewables table and modifies the `Reviewable#list_for` method to show these items when passing the `status: :pending` option, even if the score is not high enough. ReviewableQueuedPosts and ReviewableUsers are always created using this option.
This commit adds an additional find_user_by_email hook to ManagedAuthenticator so that GitHub login can continue to support secondary email addresses
The github_user_infos table will be dropped in a follow-up commit.
This is the last core authenticator to be migrated to ManagedAuthenticator 🎉
- IgnoredUser records should all now have an expiring_at value. This commit enforces that in the DB, and fixes any corrupt rows
- Changes to the ignored user list are now handled by the `/u/{username}/notification_level` endpoint. This allows setting expiration dates on the ignore. This commit removes the old logic for saving a list of usernames in the user preferences.
- Many specs were calling `IgnoredUser.create`. This commit changes them to use `Fabricate(:ignored_user)` for consistency
This commit adds a site setting `auto_close_topics_create_linked_topic`
which when enabled works in conjunction with `auto_close_topics_post_count`
setting and creates a new linked topic for the topic just closed.
The auto-created new topic contains a link for all the previous topics
and the topic titles are appended with `(Part {n})`.
The setting is enabled by default.
Adds a new slow mode for topics that are heating up. Users will have to wait for a period of time before being able to post again.
We store this interval inside the topics table and track the last time a user posted using the last_posted_at datetime in the TopicUser relation.
Dependency on gifsicle, allow_animated_avatars and allow_animated_thumbnails
site settings were all removed. Animated GIF images are still allowed, but
the generated optimized images are no longer animated for those (which were
used for avatars and thumbnails).
The added 'animated' is populated by extracting information using FastImage.
This field was used to selectively reoptimize old animations. This process
happens in the background.
Now that we have support for user-selectable color schemes, it makes sense
to simplify seeding and theme updates in the wizard.
We now:
- seed only one theme, named "Default" (previously "Light")
- seed a user-selectable Dark color scheme
- rename the "Themes" wizard step to "Colors"
- update the default theme's color scheme if a default is set
(a new theme is created if there is no default)
This code is a no-op on all sites, even though it looks rather dangerous
this migration has long run prior to people trying exploit it.
That said ... hygiene here ... is not good.
Remove this legacy, we do not want it, even in historical migrations.
Previously, Jobs::EnqueueDigestEmails would enqueue a digest job for every user, even if there are no topics to send. The digest job would exit, no email would send, and last_emailed_at would not change. 30 minutes later, Jobs::EnqueueDigestEmails would run again and re-enqueue jobs for the same users.
120fa8ad introduced a temporary mitigation for this issue, by randomly selecting a subset of those users each time.
This commit adds a new `digest_attempted_at` column to the `user_stats` table. This column is updated every time a digest job completes for a user. Using this, we can avoid scheduling digest jobs for the same user every 30 minutes. This also removes the random user selection in 120fa8ad, and instead prioritizes users who had digests attempted the longest time ago.
See https://meta.discourse.org/t/changing-a-users-email/164512 for additional context.
Previously when an admin user changed a user's email we assumed that they would need a password reset too because they likely did not have access to their account. This proved to be incorrect, as there are other reasons a user needs admin to change their email. This PR:
* Changes the admin change email for user flow so the user is sent an email to confirm the change
* We now record who the email change request was requested by
* If the requested by user is admin and not the user we note this in the email sent to the user
* We also make the confirm change email route open to anonymous users, so it can be clicked by the user even if they do not have access to their account. If there is a logged in user we make sure the confirmation matches the current user.
The reviewable was updated despite the user not being approved because a u.id = r.target_id condition is missing. It only affected user reviewables that were pending when the migration ran. Users were not auto-approved.
This PR removes the user reminder topic timers, because that system has been supplanted and improved by bookmark reminders. The option is removed from the UI and all existing user reminder topic timers are migrated to bookmark reminders.
Migration does this:
* Get all topic_timers with status_type 5 (reminders)
* Gets all bookmarks where the user ID and topic ID match
* Loops through the found topic timers
* If there is no bookmark for the OP of the topic, then we just create a bookmark with a reminder
* If there is a bookmark for the OP of the topic and it does **not** have a reminder set, then just
update it with the topic timer reminder
* If there is a bookmark for the OP of the topic with a reminder then just discard the topic timer
* Cancels all outstanding user reminder topic timers
* **Trashes (not deletes) all user reminder topic timers**
Notes:
* For now I have left the user reminder topic timer job class in place; this is so the jobs can be cancelled in the migration. It and the specs will be deleted in the next PR.
* At a later date I will write a migration to delete all trashed user topic timers. They are not deleted here in case there are data issues and they need to be recovered.
* A future PR will change the UI of the topic timer modal to make it look more like the bookmark modal.
On the topic view route we query for reviewables of each post in the stream,
using a query that filters on two unindexed columns. This results in a Parallel Seq Scan
over all rows, which can take quite some time (~20ms was seen) on forums with lots of flags
After index is added PostgreSQL planner opts for a simple Index Scan and runs in sub 1ms.
Before:
```
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finalize GroupAggregate (cost=11401.08..11404.87 rows=20 width=28) (actual time=19.209..19.209 rows=1 loops=1)
Group Key: r.target_id
-> Gather Merge (cost=11401.08..11404.41 rows=26 width=28) (actual time=19.202..20.419 rows=1 loops=1)
Workers Planned: 2
Workers Launched: 2
-> Partial GroupAggregate (cost=10401.06..10401.38 rows=13 width=28) (actual time=16.958..16.958 rows=0 loops=3)
Group Key: r.target_id
-> Sort (cost=10401.06..10401.09 rows=13 width=16) (actual time=16.956..16.956 rows=0 loops=3)
Sort Key: r.target_id
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
Worker 0: Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
Worker 1: Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.42..10400.82 rows=13 width=16) (actual time=15.894..16.938 rows=0 loops=3)
-> Parallel Seq Scan on reviewables r (cost=0.00..10302.47 rows=8 width=12) (actual time=15.882..16.927 rows=0 loops=3)
Filter: (((target_type)::text = 'Post'::text) AND (target_id = ANY ('{7565483,7565563,7565566,7565567,7565568,7565569,7565579,7565580,7565583,7565586,7565588,7565589,7565601,7565602,7565603,7565613,7565620,7565623,7565624,7565626}'::integer[])))
Rows Removed by Filter: 49183
-> Index Scan using index_reviewable_scores_on_reviewable_id on reviewable_scores s (cost=0.42..12.27 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.029..0.030 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (reviewable_id = r.id)
Planning Time: 0.318 ms
Execution Time: 20.470 ms
```
After:
```
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=0.84..342.54 rows=20 width=28) (actual time=0.038..0.038 rows=1 loops=1)
Group Key: r.target_id
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.84..341.95 rows=31 width=16) (actual time=0.020..0.033 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using index_reviewables_on_target_id on reviewables r (cost=0.42..96.07 rows=20 width=12) (actual time=0.013..0.026 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (target_id = ANY ('{7565483,7565563,7565566,7565567,7565568,7565569,7565579,7565580,7565583,7565586,7565588,7565589,7565601,7565602,7565603,7565613,7565620,7565623,7565624,7565626}'::integer[]))
-> Index Scan using index_reviewable_scores_on_reviewable_id on reviewable_scores s (cost=0.42..12.27 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (reviewable_id = r.id)
Planning Time: 0.253 ms
Execution Time: 0.067 ms
```
The problem with this index is that on sites with a high non-pm to pm
posts ratio, the index is esstentially duplicating the existing index on
`PostSearchData#search_data`. If the site is huge, the index ends up
taking up more diskspace.
Very large batches can take an enormous amount of time due to churn
Limiting to 200k changes at a time gives us a far larger chance of finishing
the job without timing out or deadlocking.
Enabling the moderators_manage_categories_and_groups site setting will allow moderator users to create/manage groups.
* show New Group form to moderators
* Allow moderators to update groups and read logs, where appropriate
* Rename site setting from create -> manage
* improved tests
* Migration should rename old log entries
* Log group changes, even if those changes mean you can no longer see the group
* Slight reshuffle
* RouteTo /g if they no longer have permissions to view group
A giant transaction in a post migration can be very risky.
This splits the large amount of work this migration needs to do into 2 parts:
1. A re-runnable cleanup job prior to transaction
2. A minimally sized transaction to add the database constraint
This avoids large amounts of churn on the table
