Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Loïc Guitaut
584424594e DEV: Replace params by the contract object in services
This patch replaces the parameters provided to a service through
`params` by the contract object.

That way, it allows better consistency when accessing input params. For
example, if you have a service without a contract, to access a
parameter, you need to use `params[:my_parameter]`. But with a contract,
you do this through `contract.my_parameter`. Now, with this patch,
you’ll be able to access it through `params.my_parameter` or
`params[:my_parameter]`.

Some methods have been added to the contract object to better mimic a
Hash. That way, when accessing/using `params`, you don’t have to think
too much about it:
- `params.my_key` is also accessible through `params[:my_key]`.
- `params.my_key = value` can also be done through `params[:my_key] =
  value`.
- `#slice` and `#merge` are available.
- `#to_hash` has been implemented, so the contract object will be
  automatically cast as a hash by Ruby depending on the context. For
  example, with an AR model, you can do this: `user.update(**params)`.
2024-10-25 14:48:34 +02:00
Loïc Guitaut
41584ab40c DEV: Provide user input to services using params key
Currently in services, we don’t make a distinction between input
parameters, options and dependencies.

This can lead to user input modifying the service behavior, whereas it
was not the developer intention.

This patch addresses the issue by changing how data is provided to
services:
- `params` is now used to hold all data coming from outside (typically
  user input from a controller) and a contract will take its values from
  `params`.
- `options` is a new key to provide options to a service. This typically
  allows changing a service behavior at runtime. It is, of course,
  totally optional.
- `dependencies` is actually anything else provided to the service (like
  `guardian`) and available directly from the context object.

The `service_params` helper in controllers has been updated to reflect
those changes, so most of the existing services didn’t need specific
changes.

The options block has the same DSL as contracts, as it’s also based on
`ActiveModel`. There aren’t any validations, though. Here’s an example:
```ruby
options do
  attribute :allow_changing_hidden, :boolean, default: false
end
```
And here’s an example of how to call a service with the new keys:
```ruby
MyService.call(params: { key1: value1, … }, options: { my_option: true }, guardian:, …)
```
2024-10-25 09:57:59 +02:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
644e6c7f46
FEATURE: auto_action_type field for flags (#29306)
Allow admins to specify if the flag should be `auto_action_type`. If yes, then when an admin flags a post,  it is automatically actioned.

Meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/allow-creation-of-custom-flags-which-auto-hide-content-similar-to-spam-and-inapproriate/329894
2024-10-22 10:56:31 +11:00
Loïc Guitaut
7f607699b8 DEV: Refactor flag related services a bit
Extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29129.

This patch makes the code more compliant with the upcoming service docs
best practices.
2024-10-18 10:10:28 +02:00
Loïc Guitaut
fc1c5f6a8d DEV: Have contract take a block in services
Currently in services, the `contract` step is only used to define where
the contract will be called in the execution flow. Then, a `Contract`
class has to be defined with validations in it.

This patch allows the `contract` step to take a block containing
validations, attributes, etc. directly. No need to then open a
`Contract` class later in the service.

It also has a nice side effect, as it’s now easy to define multiples
contracts inside the same service. Before, we had the `class_name:`
option, but it wasn’t really useful as you had to redefine a complete
new contract class.
Now, when using a name for the contract other than `default`, a new
contract will be created automatically using the provided name.

Example:
```ruby
contract(:user) do
  attribute :user_id, :integer

  validates :user_id, presence: true
end
```
This will create a `UserContract` class and use it, also putting the
resulting contract in `context[:user_contract]`.
2024-10-02 17:00:01 +09:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c5a024f8df
FIX: custom flag name should be unique (#28869)
Validation to ensure that the custom flag name is unique.
2024-09-30 09:17:19 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
e020888b0a
FIX: flag valid type inclusion should be lambda (#28030)
There is a bug with chat type flags - "An error occurred: Applies to is not included in the list"

Flag.valid_applies_to_types is a set of core types and types registered by plugins `Set.new(DEFAULT_VALID_APPLIES_TO | DiscoursePluginRegistry.flag_applies_to_types)`

Using lamba should ensure that valid values are calculated dynamically.
2024-07-23 11:47:50 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c975c7fe1b
FEATURE: custom flag can require additional message (#27908)
Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.

I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
2024-07-18 10:10:22 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
9e4e591d60
Revert "FEATURE: custom flag can require additional message (#27706)" (#27906)
This reverts commit c0bcd979e3.
2024-07-15 09:45:57 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c0bcd979e3
FEATURE: custom flag can require additional message (#27706)
Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.

I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
2024-07-15 08:48:01 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c3fadc7330
FEATURE: created edit and delete flags (#27484)
Allow admins to create edit and delete flags.
2024-07-03 08:45:37 +10:00