The root cause of the issue was that the route was overriding the 'error' action from the correctly implemented handler in routes/application.js.
Remove the custom handler, and the duplicated template logic for displaying the errorHtml.
Fixes: e16b3da04a
Being that system badges ship with every instance of Discourse, we've opted to define the name, description, and long description in our locales files to promote translation into other languages. When an admin visited the overview page of a system badge in their admin panel, they were met with disabled inputs for these text properties. The problem is that we failed to educate the admin that the text needs to be managed via the site text customization settings.
This change adds a small "Customize Text" link under theses inputs that takes the admin to the specific site text customization where they can make desired changes.
* FIX: Restore dismissing the first notification
Reverts the temporary fix (8e4fea897e) and restores the feature introduced in e638d43f0a.
The issue that was the reason for the revert (https://meta.discourse.org/t/logins-redirects-to-missing-notifications-page/149718) was a combination of two bugs:
1. Fixed in this commit - the click listener was accidentally registered also for logged-out users. This meant that the first click on a page always trigger an AJAX call to the notifications endpoint (`/notifications?recent=true&limit=5`), which returned a 403 error. Now, this code is run only when the user is logged in.
2. A still unknown bug that I could not reproduce, which was somehow setting the login redirect cookie to the URL of that previously failed AJAX request.
When jobs are enqueued inside a transaction, it's possible that they will be executed before the necessary data is available in the database. This commit ensures all jobs are enqueued in an ActiveRecord after_commit hook.
One potential downside here is if the job fails to enqueue, the transaction will no longer be aborted. However, the chance of that happening is reasonably low, and the impact is significantly lower than the current issue where jobs are scheduled before their data is ready.
The propagated promise failure from model() caused the router to reject future route transitions, even though it correctly routed to the last-resort 404 page.
Co-authored-by: Jeff Wong <awole20@gmail.com>
We should always hide user_id in response when `hide_email_address_taken` setting is enabled. Currently, it can be used to determine if the email was used or not.
A small change that would allow components to extend the tag
display in the filter dropdown, like they can in other contexts.
Was requested in the tag icons component, see
https://meta.discourse.org/t/tag-icons-component/109757/60?u=pmusaraj
The PR also standardises tag styling in select-kit dropdowns.
This ensures that users are only served cached content in their own language. This commit also refactors to make use of the `Discourse.cache` framework rather than direct redis access
Notification is created by a job. If the job is evaluated before changes are committed to a database, a notification will have an incorrect URL.
Therefore, the job should be lodged in enqueue_jobs method which is triggered after the transaction:
```ruby
Topic.transaction do
move_posts_to topic
end
add_allowed_users(participants) if participants.present? && @move_to_pm
enqueue_jobs(topic)
```
I improved a little bit specs to ensure that the destination topic_id is set. However, that tests are passing even without code improvements. I couldn't find an easy way to "delay" database transaction.
Meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/bug-with-notifications-for-moved-posts/168937
* FEATURE: Allow Category Group Moderators to edit topic titles
Adds category group moderators to the topic guardian’s `can_edit` method.
The value of `can_edit` is returned by the topic view serializer, and this value determines whether the current user can edit the title/category/tags of the topic directly (which category group moderators could already do by editing the first post of a topic).
Note that the value of `can_edit` is now always returned by the topic view serializer (ie, for both true and false values) to cover the case where a topic is moved out of a category that a category group moderator has permissions on, so that when the topic is reloaded the UI picks up that `can_edit` is now false, and thus the edit icon should no longer be displayed.
* DEV: Add a comment explaining why `can_edit` is always returned
When the invite was being redeemed and the ReviewableUser record status
for the invited user was not pending an error was being raised.
This commit makes sure that we are only looking for ReviewableUser
record with status pending and updates that to approved.
* FIX: show/hide ignored users preferences
based on the current user trust level and the appropriate site setting.
* Allow us to await the `updateCurrentUser` call
Co-authored-by: Robin Ward <robin.ward@gmail.com>
User directory items are sorted by some activity metric. If those metrics have the same value, postgres does not guarantee the order in which they will be returned. This can cause issues in pagination - some users may appear twice, and some may be missed. To illustrate
```
pry(main)> query = DirectoryItem.where(period_type: DirectoryItem.period_types[:weekly]).order(:likes_received).limit(50);
pry(main)> page1 = query.offset(0).pluck(:id);
pry(main)> page2 = query.offset(50).pluck(:id);
pry(main)> (page1 & page2).count # users on both pages
=> 29
```
If we use the primary key to tie-break matching metrics, things are much more reliable
```
pry(main)> query = DirectoryItem.where(period_type: DirectoryItem.period_types[:weekly]).order(:likes_received, :id).limit(50);
pry(main)> page1 = query.offset(0).pluck(:id);
pry(main)> page2 = query.offset(50).pluck(:id);
pry(main)> (page1 & page2).count # users on both pages
=> 0
```
This most commonly effects new sites where all the directory metrics are zero.
The fact that the ordering is indeterminate makes it difficult to write a reliable test case for this.
If a user could not set tags because they had a trust level lower than
min_trust_level_to_tag_topics site setting, the "Create Topic" button
from a tag page would still show up and be enabled. Clicking it caused
the composer model to silently have the tags set.
