The experimental user menu has a tab that displays recent reviewables and at the moment when a new signs up for the site and they need to be approved, admins see a very scary "suspicious user" copy in the reviewables tab in the user menu. We don't need the copy to be very scary because when a user needs to be approved, it's because the site operator has configured the site to force all new users to go through the review queue and it's not some kind of spam detector flagging the user.
When tagging is enabled, we were correctly serializing tags by their name. However, when tagging was disabled we were attempting to serialize an entire Tag object which raises an error since ee07f6da7d.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/232885
The key fix in this commit is that it removes `this.replaceState(path)` for anchor-only URLs. We still intercept those routing changes to properly calculate the scroll position of the anchor via `jumpToElement`, but we no longer use the Ember router to override the browser's history. This fixes the subfolder issue and also lets the browser maintain its history correctly.
The commit also includes a small refactor to the `jumpToElement` helper to facilitate stubbing in tests.
Secure media requests go through the app. In topics with many images, this makes it very easy to hit rate limiters. Skipping the low-res placeholders reduces the chance of this problem occuring.
Reverts #18241 and fixes issues with the original PR:
1. Remove an extraneous `margin-left: auto` from a grid cell (this was causing the buggy behavior in webkit)
2. Add `grid-area` name to `.extra-info-wrapper`
3. Account for `.wrap` padding
4. Remove unused css (`.header-row` and inner styles)
`delete_previous!` deletes existing topics even when we cannot send a new one due to the `limit_once_per` option. The dashboard problems PM gets deleted the next time the job runs (30 minutes), so the inbox could be empty when
admins click on the summary notification.
This PR restores a small feature which was present in the old menu and allowed users to click on the active tab in the menu to navigate to some page that showed the same items in the menu but with more details.
For example, if you switch to the PMs tab and then click on it again, currently nothing happens. However, with this change, clicking on the tab again will take you to your messages page at `/my/messages`.
Note: plugins that register custom tabs in the menu can provide a `linkWhenActive` property for their tab if they wish to mimic core's tabs, but it's optional; if they don't provide one, the tab will do nothing if the user clicks on it again.
Internal topic: t/73349.
Because Discourse is a single-page application, clicks on the majority of `<a>` elements in the app need to be intercepted by JavaScript to prevent browsers' default action (full page reload). Links in the user menu - which include notifications, reviewables, bookmarks etc. - are no exception to this rule and currently clicks on these items are handled by the global [click-interceptor](1fa21ed415/app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/lib/intercept-click.js (L20)) which calls the `preventDefault` function on the click event object and uses the `DiscourseURL.routeTo` function to route the user to the page they request.
However, for links in the user menu, there's an extra step which is to let the header know that it should close the user menu after clicking an item in the menu, but the global interceptor doesn't know that because the step is specific to links in the user menu. This can cause a bug on mobile devices where the menu remains open after clicking on a notification which results in the user having to close the menu to see the page that the notification takes them to.
This commit adds a click handler to user menu items that ensures the menu is closed when an item is clicked and navigates the user to wherever the item links to. There's a small downside to this change which is that user menu items now have their own click interceptor instead of relying on the global interceptor, i.e. duplicated logic, but since it's only a couple of lines, I think we can live with it for a while.
I did try to make the click handler of the user menu items only close the menu (call the `closeUserMenu` function), but for some reasons it caused a full page reload to happen when clicking a notification item due to some weird interactions between the header widget and the user menu. I didn't debug this thoroughly because we have plans to change the header implementation from widgets/virtual-dom to Glimmer component, which will likely resolve that weird full page reload issue and we'll be able to make the click handler just close the menu and let the global interceptor prevents the default action and do the routing.
Internal topic: t/71911/118.
Right now the experimental user menu sorts notifications the same way that the old menu does: unread high-priority notifications are shown first in reverse-chronological order followed by everything else also in reverse-chronological order. However, since the experimental user menu has dedicated tabs for some notification types and each tab displays a badge with the count of unread notifications in the tab, we feel like it makes sense to change how notifications are sorted in the experimental user menu to this:
1. unread high-priority notifications
2. unread regular notifications
3. all read notifications (both high-priority and regular)
4. within each group, notifications are sorted in reverse-chronological order (i.e. newest is shown first).
This new sorting logic applies to all tabs in the experimental user menu, however it doesn't change anything in the old menu. With this change, if a tab in the experimental user menu shows an unread notification badge for a really old notification, it will be surfaced to the top and prevents confusing scenarios where a user sees an unread notification badge on a tab, but the tab doesn't show the unread notification because it's too old to make it to the list.
Internal topic: t72199.
