This commit continues on work laid out by 6039b513fe to redesign the /about page. In this commit, we add sections for showing the site admins and moderators.
The lists of admins and moderators display the 10 most recently seen admins/moderators, with a button to display the rest of admins or moderators. Admins or moderators that have not logged in to the site in the last year will not be shown. Clicking on an admin's or moderator's name/avatar will show their user card.
Very similar to move up/down flag problem fixed here - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/28272
Those are the steps to toggle the flag:
1. click toggle - `saving` CSS class is added;
2. request to backend;
3. `saving` CSS class is removed.
And check if the flag was toggle was:
```ruby
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
has_no_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
end
```
If the save action is very fast, then the saving class is removed before the first check.
Therefore I decided to invert it, and once action is finished add `saved` CSS class.
Then we can have a quick positive check:
```ruby
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saved")
end
```
Those are the steps to move the flag:
1. open menu;
2. click move up - `saving` CSS class is added;
3. request to backend;
4. `saving` CSS class is removed.
To check if the action was finished we are using this method:
```
def move_up(key)
open_flag_menu(key)
find(".admin-flag-item__move-up").click
has_saved_flag?(key)
self
end
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
has_no_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
end
```
However, sometimes specs were failing with `expected to find CSS ".admin-flag-item.spam.saving" but there were no matches`
I think that the problem is with those 2 lines:
```
find(".admin-flag-item__move-up").click
has_closed_flag_menu?
```
If the save action is very fast, then the `saving` class is removed before the first check.
Therefore, to determine that the move action is finished, I am checking if the menu is closed.
This commit continues on work laid out by 6039b513fe to redesign the /about page. In this commit, we add the site age and a section on the right hand side to show site activities/statistics such as topics, posts, sign-ups, likes etc.
Admin can create up to 50 custom flags. It is limited for performance reasons.
When the limit is reached "Add button" is disabled and backend is protected by guardian.
In the formkit conversion in 2ca06ba236
we missed setting a type for the UppyImageUploader for badges. Also,
we were not passing down the `image_url` as form data, so when we used
`data.image` for that field the badge was not updating in the UI after
page loads and the image URL was not loading for preview.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Form Kit is our new form library/framework for unifying the way forms look across Discourse. The admin config area for the /about page is a new form that isn't currently used, so it makes sense for it to be one of the first forms to be migrated to Form Kit to test the library.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Replaces the existing topic map with the experimental-topic-map made by @awesomerobot.
---------
Co-authored-by: awesomerobot <kris.aubuchon@discourse.org>
This commit introduces the foundation for a new design for the /about page that we're currently working on. The current version will remain available and still be the default until we finish the new version and are ready to roll out. To opt into the new version right now, add one or more group to the `experimental_redesigned_about_page_groups` site setting and members in those groups will get the new version.
Internal topic: t/128545.
This PR introduces FormKit, a component-based form library designed to simplify form creation and management. This library provides a single `Form` component, various field components, controls, validation mechanisms, and customization options. Additionally, it includes helpers to facilitate testing and writing specifications for forms.
1. **Form Component**:
- The main component that encapsulates form logic and structure.
- Yields various utilities like `Field`, `Submit`, `Alert`, etc.
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
import Form from "discourse/form";
<template>
<Form as |form|>
<form.Field
@name="username"
@title="Username"
@validation="required"
as |field|
>
<field.Input />
</form.Field>
<form.Field @name="age" @title="Age" as |field|>
<field.Input @type="number" />
</form.Field>
<form.Submit />
</Form>
</template>
```
2. **Validation**:
- Built-in validation rules such as `required`, `number`, `length`, and `url`.
- Custom validation callbacks for more complex validation logic.
**Example Usage**:
```javascript
validateUsername(name, value, data, { addError }) {
if (data.bar / 2 === value) {
addError(name, "That's not how maths work.");
}
}
```
```hbs
<form.Field @name="username" @validate={{this.validateUsername}} />
```
3. **Customization**:
- Plugin outlets for extending form functionality.
- Styling capabilities through propagated attributes.
- Custom controls with properties provided by `form` and `field`.
**Example Usage**:
```hbs
<Form class="my-form" as |form|>
<form.Field class="my-field" as |field|>
<MyCustomControl id={{field.id}} @onChange={{field.set}} />
</form.Field>
</Form>
```
4. **Helpers for Testing**:
- Test assertions for form and field validation.
**Example usage**:
```javascript
assert.form().hasErrors("the form shows errors");
assert.form().field("foo").hasValue("bar", "user has set the value");
```
- Helper for interacting with he form
**Example usage**:
```javascript
await formKit().field("foo").fillIn("bar");
```
5. **Page Object for System Specs**:
- Page objects for interacting with forms in system specs.
- Methods for submitting forms, checking alerts, and interacting with fields.
**Example Usage**:
```ruby
form = PageObjects::Components::FormKit.new(".my-form")
form.submit
expect(form).to have_an_alert("message")
```
**Field Interactions**:
```ruby
field = form.field("foo")
expect(field).to have_value("bar")
field.fill_in("bar")
```
6. **Collections handling**:
- A specific component to handle array of objects
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
<Form @data={{hash foo=(array (hash bar=1) (hash bar=2))}} as |form|>
<form.Collection @name="foo" as |collection|>
<collection.Field @name="bar" @title="Bar" as |field|>
<field.Input />
</collection.Field>
</form.Collection>
</Form>
```
The watch words controller creation function, create_or_update_word(), doesn’t validate the size of the replacement parameter, unlike the word parameter, when creating a replace watched word. So anyone with moderator privileges can create watched words with almost unlimited characters.
Handles the cases where the sections titles are Unicode only strings, allowing them to be expanded separately if the Unicode string contains letters.
Also prevents a sidebar section with the header hidden to be displayed collapsed.
There's currently a race condition in the following spec:
65be7a7880/spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb (L70-L95)
where the form can be saved before the image uploader field has finished uploading the selected image and causing the assertion at line 94 to fail with the following error:
```
Failure/Error: expect(SiteSetting.about_banner_image.sha1).to eq(Upload.generate_digest(image_file))
NoMethodError:
undefined method `sha1' for nil
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_admin_about_config_area_page_the_general_settings_card_can_saves_its_fields_to_their_corresponding_site_settings_312.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
http://localhost:31338/assets/vendor.js 15902:14 "WARNING: uppy needs a unique id, pass one in to the component implementing this mixin"
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb:94:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:513:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:503:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:460:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.23.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
This PR fixes the problem by making the system test wait for the image to finish uploading (with 10 seconds timeout) before carrying out the rest of the system test.
I am changing many of these to notes or resolving them as is,
most of these I have not actively worked on in years so someone
else can work on them when we get to these areas again.
This commit continues work laid out by ffec8163b0 for the admin config page for the /about page. The last commit set up the user interface, and this one sets up all the wiring needed to make the input fields and save buttons actually work.
Internal topic: t/128544.
While creating a new category if the user didn't specify a value for `minimum_required_tags` input but clicked it then it returned the "PG::NotNullViolation: null value in column 'minimum_required_tags'" error.
When visiting a user profile, and then opening the search, there's an option to filter down by posts made by that user.
When clicking that option, it used to pre-fill the "search bar" with "@<username>" to filter down the search.
This restore this behaviour and add a system spec to ensure it doesn't regress.
Context - https://meta.discourse.org/t/in-posts-by-search-option-does-not-work-when-clicked/312916
We want to allow admins to make new required fields apply to existing users. In order for this to work we need to have a way to make those users fill up the fields on their next page load. This is very similar to how adding a 2FA requirement post-fact works. Users will be redirected to a page where they can fill up the remaining required fields, and until they do that they won't be able to do anything else.
Many site settings can be distructive or have huge side-effects
for a site that the admin may not be aware of when changing it.
This commit introduces a `requires_confirmation` attribute that
can be added to any site setting. When it is true, a confirmation
dialog will open if that setting is changed in the admin UI,
optionally with a custom message that is defined in client.en.yml.
If the admin does not confirm, we reset the setting to its previous
clean value and do not save the new value.
When we turn on settings automatically for customers,
we sometimes use `.set_and_log` which will make a staff
action log for the site setting change. This is fine, but
there is no context for customers.
This change allows setting a message with `.set_and_log`, which
will be stored in the `details` column of the staff action log
created, which will show up on `/admin/logs/staff_action_logs`
---------
Co-authored-by: Kelv <kelv@discourse.org>
* FEATURE: Add Filter for Webhook Events by Status
* Fixing multiple issues
* Lint
* Fixing multiple issues
* Change the range of the status for webhook events
We want to get rid of the old topic bulk actions modal
and use the new dropdown (currently gated behind
experimental_topic_bulk_actions_enabled_groups). To do
this we need to use the new dropdown in all places in the
UI.
This commit changes the full page search UI to use the new
topic bulk actions dropdown if experimental_topic_bulk_actions_enabled_groups
is enabled, and makes some minor refactors to make this work.
Also add a spec for both the old and new functionality.
This commit fixes a problem where the user will not be able to reset
their password when they only have security keys and backup codes
configured.
This commit also makes the following changes/fixes:
1. Splits password reset system tests to
`spec/system/forgot_password_spec.rb` instead of missing the system
tests in `spec/system/login_spec.rb` which is mainly used to test
the login flow.
2. Fixes a UX issue where the `Use backup codes` or `Use authenticator
app` text is shown on the reset password form when the user does
not have either backup codes or an authenticator app configured.
Continued work on moderate flags UI.
In this PR admins are allowed to change the order of flags. The notify user flag is always on top but all other flags can be moved.
Prior to this fix we were opening a modal before closing the `DMenu` modal, given `DModal` expects only one modal at a time it was closing the latest modal and instantly closing the one we just opened.
We're planning to implement a feature that allows adding required fields for existing users. This PR does some preparatory refactoring to make that possible. There should be no changes to existing behaviour. Just a small update to the admin UI.
(experimental)
The initial implementation of glimmer topic-list and related components. Does not include new APIs and isn't compatible with existing customization. That's gonna come in future PRs.
Enabled by adding groups to `experimental_glimmer_topic_list_groups` setting.
- login with username/password
- login with username/password and 2FA
- login with username/password back up code
- login with magic link
- login with magic link and 2FA
- login with magic link and back up code
- login when 2FA is required
- reset password
---
- signup and activate account
- signup with invite code
- signup with invite link
- signup and approve account
- signup and auto approve account
- signup with blocked domain
---
- basic login with Facebook
- basic login with Google
- basic login with Github
- basic login with Twitter
- basic login with Discord
- basic login with Linkedin
Some sites are still on the legacy "hamburger dropdown"
navigation_menu setting. In this case to avoid confusion,
we want to show both the sidebar icon and the header dropdown
hamburger when visiting the admin portal. Otherwise, the
hamburger switches sides from right to left for admins
and takes on different behaviour.
The hamburger in this case _only_ shows the main panel, not
other sidebar panels like the admin one.
DropdownMenu component is meant as a way to describe the content of menus.
Syntax:
```
<DropdownMenu as |dm|>
<dm.item class="test">
First
</dm.item>
<dm.divider class="foo" />
<dm.item class="bar">
Second
</dm.item>
</DropdownMenu>
```
This commits updates
`PageObjects::Components::NavigationMenu::Base#click_edit_tags_button`
to wait for `.sidebar-tags-form` to be present before returning. This is
essential because the client side app has to load the tags from the
server when the modal is open. If we don't wait for all the tags to be
loaded, it makes it hard to reason about the state of the UI when
interacting with the modal. In the case of "allows a user to deselect all tags in the modal which will display the site's top tags" which
was flaky, the system test was interacting with the UI when the tags are
still loading.
