Followup 9762e65758
When we added the Revise... option for posts/new topics
in the review queue, which sends a PM to the user, we used
`SystemMessage.create_from_system_user`, which always sends
the PM from the system user. However, this makes it so if the
user replies to the PM, which they are encouraged to do,
no one will see it unless they actively monitor the system inbox.
This commit changes it so `SystemMessage.create` is used,
which uses the `site_contact_username` and `site_contact_group`
site settings as participants in the sent PM. Then, when the
user replies, it will send to that inbox instead.
If `site_contact_username` is blank, the system user is used.
Currently, categories support designating only 1 group as a moderation group on the category. This commit removes the one group limitation and makes it possible to designate multiple groups as mods on a category.
Internal topic: t/124648.
When `SiteSetting.review_every_post` is true and the category `require_topic_approval` system creates two reviewable items.
1. Firstly, because the category needs approval, the `ReviewableQueuePost` record` is created - at this stage, no topic is created.
2. Admin is approving the review. The topic and first post are created.
3. Because `review_every_post` is true `queue_for_review_if_possible` callback is evaluated and `ReviewablePost` is created.
4. Then `ReviewableQueuePost` is linked to the newly generated topic and post.
At the beginning, we were thinking about hooking to those guards:
```
def self.queue_for_review_if_possible(post, created_or_edited_by)
return unless SiteSetting.review_every_post
return if post.post_type != Post.types[:regular] || post.topic.private_message?
return if Reviewable.pending.where(target: post).exists?
...
```
And add something like
```
return if Reviewable.approved.where(target: post).exists?
```
However, because the callback happens in point 3. before the `ReviewableQueuePost` is linked to the `Topic`, it was not possible.
Therefore, when `ReviewableQueuePost` is creating a `Topic`, a new option called `:reviewed_queued_post` is passed to `PostCreator` to avoid creating a second `Reviewable`.
Followup to 9762e65758. This
original commit did not take into account the fact that
new topics can end up in the approval queue as a
ReviewableQueuedPost, and so there was a 500 error raised
when accessing `self.topic` when sending a PM to the user.
This commit adds a new Revise... action that can be taken
for queued post reviewables. This will open a modal where
the user can select a Reason from a preconfigured list
(or by choosing Other..., a custom reason) and provide feedback
to the user about their post.
The post will be rejected still, but a PM will also be sent to
the user so they have an opportunity to improve their post when
they resubmit it.
Follow-up to #23199 in which we moved the "delete user" options under the relevant action menu for flagged post. This change does the same, but to queued posts.
Performing a `Delete User`/`Delete and Block User` reviewable actions for a
queued post reviewable from the `review.show` route results in an error
popup even if the action completes successfully.
This happens because unlike other reviewable types, a user delete action
on a queued post reviewable results in the deletion of the reviewable
itself. A subsequent attempt to reload the reviewable record results in
404. The deletion happens as part of the call to `UserDestroyer` which
includes a step for destroying reviewables created by the user being
destroyed. At the root of this is the creator of the queued post
being set as the creator of the reviewable as instead of the system
user.
This change assigns the creator of the reviewable to the system user and
uses the more approapriate `target_created_by` column for the creator of the
post being queued.
* FIX: Remove action buttons if post has already been reviewed
* Change the approve to reject test to expect an error
* Adds a controller spec to ensure you can't edit a non-pending review item
* Remove unnessary conditional
We previously used post creator's guardian permissions which will raise an error if the reviewer added a staff-only (restricted) tag.
Co-authored-by: Natalie Tay <natalie.tay@discourse.org>
This table holds associations between uploads and other models. This can be used to prevent removing uploads that are still in use.
* DEV: Create upload_references
* DEV: Use UploadReference instead of PostUpload
* DEV: Use UploadReference for SiteSetting
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Badge
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Category
* DEV: Use UploadReference for CustomEmoji
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Group
* DEV: Use UploadReference for ThemeField
* DEV: Use UploadReference for ThemeSetting
* DEV: Use UploadReference for User
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserAvatar
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserExport
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserProfile
* DEV: Add method to extract uploads from raw text
* DEV: Use UploadReference for Draft
* DEV: Use UploadReference for ReviewableQueuedPost
* DEV: Use UploadReference for UserProfile's bio_raw
* DEV: Do not copy user uploads to upload references
* DEV: Copy post uploads again after deploy
* DEV: Use created_at and updated_at from uploads table
* FIX: Check if upload site setting is empty
* DEV: Copy user uploads to upload references
* DEV: Make upload extraction less strict
Currently when a user creates posts that are moderated (for whatever
reason), a popup is displayed saying the post needs approval and the
total number of the user’s pending posts. But then this piece of
information is kind of lost and there is nowhere for the user to know
what are their pending posts or how many there are.
This patch solves this issue by adding a new “Pending” section to the
user’s activity page when there are some pending posts to display. When
there are none, then the “Pending” section isn’t displayed at all.
Subclasses must call #delete_user_actions inside build_actions to support user deletion. The method adds a delete user bundle, which has a delete and a delete + block option. Every subclass is responsible for implementing these actions.
Admins can visit an approved queued topic from the review queue by clicking their title. We no longer store the created post and topic ids in the reviewable's payload object. Instead, we set the `topic_id` and `target_id` attributes.
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains.
We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard
Ruby patterns to require files.
This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.
Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
This is a feature that used to be present in discourse-assign but is
much easier to implement in core. It also allows a topic to be assigned
without it claiming for review and vice versa and allows it to work with
category group reviewers.
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.
Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
