Why this change?
Back in May 17 2023 along with the release of Discourse 3.1, we announced
on meta that the legacy hamburger dropdown navigation menu is
deprecated and will be dropped in Discourse 3.2. This is the link to the announcement
on meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/removing-the-legacy-hamburger-navigation-menu-option/265274
## What does this change do?
This change removes the `legacy` option from the `navigation_menu` site
setting and migrates existing sites on the `legacy` option to the
`header dropdown` option.
All references to the `legacy` option in code and tests have been
removed as well.
We have a custom implementation of #blank? in our Onebox helpers. This is likely a legacy from when Onebox was a standalone gem. This change replaces all usages with respective incarnations of #blank?, #present?, and #presence from ActiveSupport. It changes a bunch of "unless blank" to "if present" as well.
* UX: fix padding on active touch
* UX: thread list header bigger + alignment
* UX: thread list alignment desktop
* UX: visual corrections to alignment
* UX: mobile alignment and padding
Currently, if you set an integer site setting in the admin interface and include thousands separators, you will silently configure the wrong value.
This PR replaces TextField inputs for integer site settings with NumberField. It also cleans the numeric input of any non-digits in the backend in case any separators make it through.
UX changes to thread item:
- drop "last reply" timestamp copy
- drop last reply excerpt
- show up 9+OP members
Co-authored-by: David Battersby <info@davidbattersby.com>
We noticed some of these tests were flaky, sometimes they fail on assertions
related to testing tooltips. Tooltips are generally hard to test, and it's not
necessary to test tooltips in every test case. This PR isolates tooltip testing
in a dedicated test case.
Note we already did the same thing for another spec in a9dfda2 and that
seems to worked well.
Tooltips are generally hard to test, and we noticed that they make tests flaky.
We may not test tooltips in these acceptance tests, since they are already
tested in components/chat-channel-test.js. This PR deletes tooltip-related
assertions and unskips tests that became flaky after adding them.
The custom html elements we were using for bootstraping were causing Embroider to end the `<head>` tag and immediately start `<body>`. As a result most of `<meta>` tags ended up in the `<body>`.
That mean (among possibly other issues) that the app did not have CSRF token set properly on launch (in the development env)
Why this change?
Previously just using the `addToolbarPopupMenuOptionsCallback` plugin
API itself was insufficient because it required the return object to
include an `action` key which only accepted a name of the action
function as a string. This was highly problematic because the action
function had to be defined on the `composer` service which means using
the `modifyClass` API to add the action function. This made the API
awkward to use leading to poor developer experiencec.
What does this change do?
This commit introduces a couple of improvemnts to the API.
1. First the API has been renamed to `addComposerToolbarPopupMenuOption` because
the API no longer accepts a callback function which was quite
redundant. Instead, it now accepts an Object. The
`addToolbarPopupMenuOptionsCallback` API function is deprecated and
will be dropped in Discourse 3.3. Note that passing the API a
function is still supported but will be dropped when the `addToolbarPopupMenuOptionsCallback`
is removed.
2. The `action` key in the Object passed to the function can now be a
function and is passed the `toolbarEvent` object when called.
3. The `condition` on key in the Object passed to the function can now be a
function and is passed the `composer` service when called.
It's a special case widget - its constructor has different contructor arguments:
```js
export default class PostCooked {
constructor(attrs, decoratorHelper, currentUser) {
...
```
vs
```js
export default class Widget {
constructor(attrs, register, opts) {
...
```
Until now, plugins/themes had to follow very specific directory structures to set up plugin outlet connectors. This commit introduces a new `api.renderInOutlet` API which makes things much more flexible. Any Ember component definition can be passed to this API, and will then be rendered into the named outlet.
For example:
```javascript
import MyComponent from "discourse/plugins/my-plugin/components/my-component";
api.renderInOutlet('user-profile-primary', MyComponent);
```
When using this API alongside the gjs file format, components can be defined inline like
```javascript
api.renderInOutlet('user-profile-primary', <template>Hello world</template>);
```
Partial revert of 97a812f022.
Calling hide_plugin also hides the Chat tab in the plugins
section of admin, which is a way plugins can add an advanced
UI (in the case of chat Export and Webhooks).
Until we decide what to do in this case, it's better to revert,
since all this will do is make the discourse-chat plugin show
up again in the plugin list and restore the missing tab.
This commit brings two fixes.
- increase the delay to trigger the action menu
- check of user activation before using vibrate:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Sticky_activationhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/User_activationhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/UserActivation/hasBeenActive
> Sticky activation is a window state that indicates a user has pressed a button, moved a mouse, used a menu, or performed some other user interaction. It is not reset after it has been set initially (unlike transient activation).
> APIs that require sticky activation (not exhaustive):
> - Navigator.vibrate()
> - VirtualKeyboard.show()
> - Autoplay of Media and Web Audio APIs (in particular for AudioContexts).
Before this fix, we could end up with this error in the console in tests:
> Blocked call to navigator.vibrate because user hasn't tapped on the frame or any embedded
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
Regression from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/23668 where we stopped passing in `this.badgeReason` to the badge granting function. This PR fixes that and adds a unit test to cover that code path.
