If you turn it on now, default all users to approved since they were
previously. Also support approving a user that doesn't have a reviewable
record (it will be created first.)
This also includes a refactor to move class method calls to
`DiscourseEvent` into an initializer. Otherwise the load order of
classes makes a difference in the test environment and some settings
might be triggered and others not, randomly.
Theme developers can include any number of scss files within the /scss/ directory of a theme. These can then be imported from the main common/desktop/mobile scss.
also add a hard limit of 1000 users per job run so we do not clog the
scheduler
destroyer.destroy has a transaction and this can have some serious complications
with the open record set find_each has going
"Rejecting" a user in the queue is equivalent to deleting them, which
would then making it impossible to review rejected users. Now we store
information about the user in the payload so if they are deleted things
still display in the Rejected view.
Secondly, if a user is destroyed outside of the review queue, it will
now automatically "Reject" that queue item.
Conversely, if a user is deactivated the reviewable should automatically
be rejected.
Before this fix, if a user was not active they'd still show in the
review queue but without an "Approve" button which was confusing.
If the post ids keep loading, we might end up in a situations where
we're always loading the same post ids over and over again without
indexing anything new.
Follow up to daeda80ada.
This commit fixes the follow quality issue with `PostSearchData#raw_data`:
1. URLs are being tokenized and links with similar href and characters
are being duplicated in the raw data.
`Post#cooked`:
```
<p><a href=\"https://meta.discourse.org/some.png\" class=\"onebox\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">https://meta.discourse.org/some.png</a></p>
```
`PostSearchData#raw_data` Before:
```
This is a test topic 0 Uncategorized https://meta.discourse.org/some.png discourse org/some png https://meta.discourse.org/some.png discourse org/some png
```
`PostSearchData#raw_data` After:
```
This is a test topic 0 Uncategorized https://meta.discourse.org/some.png meta discourse org
```
2. Ligthbox being included in search pollutes the
`PostSearchData#raw_data` unncessarily.
From 28 March 2018 to 28 March 2019, searches for the term `image` on
`meta.discourse.org` had a click through rate of 2.1%. Non-lightboxed images are not included in indexing for search yet we were indexing content within a lightbox. Also, search for terms like `image` was affected we were using `Pasted image` as the filename for
uploads that were pasted.
`Post#cooked`
```
<p>Let me see how I can fix this image<br>\n<div class=\"lightbox-wrapper\"><a class=\"lightbox\" href=\"https://meta.discourse.org/some.png\" title=\"some.png\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><img src=\"https://meta.discourse.org/some.png\" width=\"275\" height=\"299\"><div class=\"meta\">\n<svg class=\"fa d-icon d-icon-far-image svg-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><use xlink:href=\"#far-image\"></use></svg><span class=\"filename\">some.png</span><span class=\"informations\">1750×2000</span><svg class=\"fa d-icon d-icon-discourse-expand svg-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><use xlink:href=\"#discourse-expand\"></use></svg>\n</div></a></div></p>
```
`PostSearchData#raw_data` Before:
```
This is a test topic 0 Uncategorized Let me see how I can fix this image some.png png https://meta.discourse.org/some.png discourse org/some png some.png png 1750×2000
```
`PostSearchData#raw_data` After:
```
This is a test topic 0 Uncategorized Let me see how I can fix this image
```
In terms of indexing performance, we now have to parse the given HTML
through nokogiri twice. However performance is not a huge worry here since a string length of 194170 takes only 30ms
to scrub plus the indexing takes place in a background job.
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.
Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
- The test_email job is removed, because it was always being run synchronously (not in sidekiq)
- 34b29f62 added a bypass for critical emails, to match the spec. This removes the bypass, and removes the spec.
- This adapts the specs for 72ffabf6, so that they check for emails being sent
- This reimplements c2797921, allowing test emails to be sent even when emails are disabled
