Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Loïc Guitaut
2f334964f2 DEV: Remove hash-like access from service contracts
We decided to keep only one way to access values from a contract. This
patch thus removes the hash-like access from contracts.
2024-10-29 16:02:51 +01:00
Loïc Guitaut
41584ab40c DEV: Provide user input to services using params key
Currently in services, we don’t make a distinction between input
parameters, options and dependencies.

This can lead to user input modifying the service behavior, whereas it
was not the developer intention.

This patch addresses the issue by changing how data is provided to
services:
- `params` is now used to hold all data coming from outside (typically
  user input from a controller) and a contract will take its values from
  `params`.
- `options` is a new key to provide options to a service. This typically
  allows changing a service behavior at runtime. It is, of course,
  totally optional.
- `dependencies` is actually anything else provided to the service (like
  `guardian`) and available directly from the context object.

The `service_params` helper in controllers has been updated to reflect
those changes, so most of the existing services didn’t need specific
changes.

The options block has the same DSL as contracts, as it’s also based on
`ActiveModel`. There aren’t any validations, though. Here’s an example:
```ruby
options do
  attribute :allow_changing_hidden, :boolean, default: false
end
```
And here’s an example of how to call a service with the new keys:
```ruby
MyService.call(params: { key1: value1, … }, options: { my_option: true }, guardian:, …)
```
2024-10-25 09:57:59 +02:00
Loïc Guitaut
d991378218 DEV: Add comments in flags specs
Followup to https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29325.

This patch adds comments to tell why we need to destroy created flags in
specs once the examples have run.
2024-10-22 10:54:26 +02:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
44c8470813
FIX: flaky flags spec after refactoring (#29325)
The bug was introduced here https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29258

It is very important for flags to reset to their original state because they are cached and shared between specs.
2024-10-22 13:18:57 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
644e6c7f46
FEATURE: auto_action_type field for flags (#29306)
Allow admins to specify if the flag should be `auto_action_type`. If yes, then when an admin flags a post,  it is automatically actioned.

Meta: https://meta.discourse.org/t/allow-creation-of-custom-flags-which-auto-hide-content-similar-to-spam-and-inapproriate/329894
2024-10-22 10:56:31 +11:00
Loïc Guitaut
64605519da DEV: Fix flaky specs related to flag services
Creating or updating flags generates global side effects. Sometimes it
seems the state can leak from the flag specs.

This is probably related to the use of `fab!`. This patch replaces those
calls with standard `let`s. While the overall performances of these
tests will be a little less good, their state should not leak anymore.
2024-10-18 17:47:09 +02:00
Loïc Guitaut
7f607699b8 DEV: Refactor flag related services a bit
Extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29129.

This patch makes the code more compliant with the upcoming service docs
best practices.
2024-10-18 10:10:28 +02:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c5a024f8df
FIX: custom flag name should be unique (#28869)
Validation to ensure that the custom flag name is unique.
2024-09-30 09:17:19 +10:00
Loïc Guitaut
d26d45540e DEV: Use run_successfully matcher in service specs 2024-08-28 16:30:09 +02:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
e020888b0a
FIX: flag valid type inclusion should be lambda (#28030)
There is a bug with chat type flags - "An error occurred: Applies to is not included in the list"

Flag.valid_applies_to_types is a set of core types and types registered by plugins `Set.new(DEFAULT_VALID_APPLIES_TO | DiscoursePluginRegistry.flag_applies_to_types)`

Using lamba should ensure that valid values are calculated dynamically.
2024-07-23 11:47:50 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c975c7fe1b
FEATURE: custom flag can require additional message (#27908)
Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.

I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
2024-07-18 10:10:22 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
9e4e591d60
Revert "FEATURE: custom flag can require additional message (#27706)" (#27906)
This reverts commit c0bcd979e3.
2024-07-15 09:45:57 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c0bcd979e3
FEATURE: custom flag can require additional message (#27706)
Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.

I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
2024-07-15 08:48:01 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
c3fadc7330
FEATURE: created edit and delete flags (#27484)
Allow admins to create edit and delete flags.
2024-07-03 08:45:37 +10:00