Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Taylor
cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to spec/* 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Martin Brennan
d3f02a1270
FEATURE: Generic hashtag autocomplete lookup and markdown cooking (#18937)
This commit fleshes out and adds functionality for the new `#hashtag` search and
lookup system, still hidden behind the `enable_experimental_hashtag_autocomplete`
feature flag.

**Serverside**

We have two plugin API registration methods that are used to define data sources
(`register_hashtag_data_source`) and hashtag result type priorities depending on
the context (`register_hashtag_type_in_context`). Reading the comments in plugin.rb
should make it clear what these are doing. Reading the `HashtagAutocompleteService`
in full will likely help a lot as well.

Each data source is responsible for providing its own **lookup** and **search**
method that returns hashtag results based on the arguments provided. For example,
the category hashtag data source has to take into account parent categories and
how they relate, and each data source has to define their own icon to use for the
hashtag, and so on.

The `Site` serializer has two new attributes that source data from `HashtagAutocompleteService`.
There is `hashtag_icons` that is just a simple array of all the different icons that
can be used for allowlisting in our markdown pipeline, and there is `hashtag_context_configurations`
that is used to store the type priority orders for each registered context.

When sending emails, we cannot render the SVG icons for hashtags, so
we need to change the HTML hashtags to the normal `#hashtag` text.

**Markdown**

The `hashtag-autocomplete.js` file is where I have added the new `hashtag-autocomplete`
markdown rule, and like all of our rules this is used to cook the raw text on both the clientside
and on the serverside using MiniRacer. Only on the server side do we actually reach out to
the database with the `hashtagLookup` function, on the clientside we just render a plainer
version of the hashtag HTML. Only in the composer preview do we do further lookups based
on this.

This rule is the first one (that I can find) that uses the `currentUser` based on a passed
in `user_id` for guardian checks in markdown rendering code. This is the `last_editor_id`
for both the post and chat message. In some cases we need to cook without a user present,
so the `Discourse.system_user` is used in this case.

**Chat Channels**

This also contains the changes required for chat so that chat channels can be used
as a data source for hashtag searches and lookups. This data source will only be
used when `enable_experimental_hashtag_autocomplete` is `true`, so we don't have
to worry about channel results suddenly turning up.

------

**Known Rough Edges**

- Onebox excerpts will not render the icon svg/use tags, I plan to address that in a follow up PR
- Selecting a hashtag + pressing the Quote button will result in weird behaviour, I plan to address that in a follow up PR
- Mixed hashtag contexts for hashtags without a type suffix will not work correctly, e.g. #ux which is both a category and a channel slug will resolve to a category when used inside a post or within a [chat] transcript in that post. Users can get around this manually by adding the correct suffix, for example ::channel. We may get to this at some point in future
- Icons will not show for the hashtags in emails since SVG support is so terrible in email (this is not likely to be resolved, but still noting for posterity)
- Additional refinements and review fixes wil
2022-11-21 08:37:06 +10:00
Martin Brennan
8ebd5edd1e
DEV: Rename secure_media to secure_uploads (#18376)
This commit renames all secure_media related settings to secure_uploads_* along with the associated functionality.

This is being done because "media" does not really cover it, we aren't just doing this for images and videos etc. but for all uploads in the site.

Additionally, in future we want to secure more types of uploads, and enable a kind of "mixed mode" where some uploads are secure and some are not, so keeping media in the name is just confusing.

This also keeps compatibility with the `secure-media-uploads` path, and changes new
secure URLs to be `secure-uploads`.

Deprecated settings:

* secure_media -> secure_uploads
* secure_media_allow_embed_images_in_emails -> secure_uploads_allow_embed_images_in_emails
* secure_media_max_email_embed_image_size_kb -> secure_uploads_max_email_embed_image_size_kb
2022-09-29 09:24:33 +10:00
Martin Brennan
e3d495850d
FEATURE: Overhaul email threading (#17996)
See https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-email-messages-are-incorrectly-threaded/233499
for thorough reasoning.

This commit changes how we generate Message-IDs and do email
threading for emails sent from Discourse. The main changes are
as follows:

* Introduce an outbound_message_id column on Post that
  is either a) filled with a Discourse-generated Message-ID
  the first time that post is used for an outbound email
  or b) filled with an original Message-ID from an external
  mail client or service if the post was created from an
  incoming email.
* Change Discourse-generated Message-IDs to be more consistent
  and static, in the format `discourse/post/:post_id@:host`
* Do not send References or In-Reply-To headers for emails sent
  for the OP of topics.
* Make sure that In-Reply-To is filled with either a) the OP's
  Message-ID if the post is not a direct reply or b) the parent
  post's Message-ID
* Make sure that In-Reply-To has all referenced post's Message-IDs
* Make sure that References is filled with a chain of Message-IDs
  from the OP down to the parent post of the new post.

We also are keeping X-Discourse-Post-Id and X-Discourse-Topic-Id,
headers that we previously removed, for easier visual debugging
of outbound emails.

Finally, we backfill the `outbound_message_id` for posts that have
a linked `IncomingEmail` record, using the `message_id` of that record.
We do not need to do that for posts that don't have an incoming email
since they are backfilled at runtime if `outbound_message_id` is missing.
2022-09-26 09:14:24 +10:00
Loïc Guitaut
3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Phil Pirozhkov
493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
Loïc Guitaut
91b6b5eee7 DEV: Don’t use change { … }.by(0) in specs 2022-07-26 10:34:15 +02:00
Martin Brennan
4d3c1ceb44
FEATURE: Log the SMTP response in EmailLog (#17056)
When sending emails with delivery_method_options -> return_response
set to true, the SMTP sending code inside Mail will return the SMTP
response when calling deliver! for mail within the app. This commit
ensures that Email::Sender captures this response if it is returned
and stores it against the EmailLog created for the sent email.

A follow up PR will make this visible within the admin email UI.
2022-06-15 10:28:30 +10:00
Blake Erickson
35e17ce115
FIX: Email Send post has already been taken error (#16992)
* FIX: Email Send post has already been taken error

Adding a failing test first before coming up with a good solution.

Related: 357011eb3b

The above commit changed

```
PostReplyKey.find_or_create_by_safe!
```

to

```
PostReplyKey.create_or_find_by!
```

But I don't think it is working as a 1-1 replacement because of the
`Validation failed: Post has already been taken` error we are receiving
with this change. Also we need to make sure we don't re-introduce any
concurrency issues.

Reported: https://meta.discourse.org/t/224706/13

* Remove rails unique constraint and rely on db index

I believe this is what is causing `create_or_find_by!` to fail. Because
we have a unique constraint in the db I think we can remove this rails
unique constraint?

* clean up spec wording
2022-06-06 13:13:26 -06:00
David Taylor
c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Jarek Radosz
45cc16098d
DEV: Move spec/components to spec/lib (#15987)
Lib specs were inexplicably split into two directories (`lib` and `components`)

This moves them all into `lib`.
2022-02-18 19:41:54 +01:00