The assign plugin is one of two situations where a post can be both a whisper and a small-action. Check the action_code field to filter out small-actions.
Running the reorder rake task was triggering the following error:
PG::UniqueViolation: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "post_timings_unique"
I re-worked the queries and refactored to use the same couple of queries for all similar tables/columns.
* Fixed an issue I introduced in the last PR where I am just archiving everything regardless of whether it is actually archived in Discourse man_facepalming
* Refactor group list_mailboxes IMAP code to use providers, add specs, and add provider code to get the correct prodivder
A first step to adding automatic dark mode color scheme switching. Adds a new SCSS file at `color_definitions.scss` that serves to output all SCSS color variables as CSS custom properties. And replaces all SCSS color variables with the new CSS custom properties throughout the stylesheets.
This is an alpha feature at this point, can only be enabled via console using the `default_dark_mode_color_scheme_id` site setting.
Adds a imap_group_id column to IncomingEmail to deal with an issue where we were trying to update emails in the mailbox, calling IncomingEmail.where(imap_sync: true). However UID and UIDVALIDITY could be the same across accounts. So if group A used IMAP details for Gmail account A, and group B used IMAP details for Gmail account B, and both tried to sync changes to an email with UID of 3 (e.g. changing Labels), one account could affect the other. This even applied to Archiving!
Also in this PR:
* Fix error occurring if we do a uid_fetch and no emails are returned
* Allow for creating labels within the target mailbox (previously we would not do this, only use existing labels)
* Improve consistency for log messages
* Add specs for generic IMAP provider (Gmail specs still to come)
* Add custom archiving support for Gmail
* Only use Message-ID for uniqueness of IncomingEmail if it was generated by us
* Various refactors and improvements
I added delete_when_reminder_sent to ignored_columns because it no longer exists and added a shortcut method delete_when_reminder_sent? to the Bookmark model. However I have been seeing some weird errors like:
> Job exception: unknown attribute 'delete_when_reminder_sent' for Bookmark.
So I am very suspicious. I am just renaming the method to auto_delete_when_reminder_sent? to avoid any potential conflicts.
Also found include_bookmark_delete_on_owner_reply? in PostSerializer which is used for nothing; I must have forgotten to delete it before.
For the following conditions, the TopicUser.bookmarked column was not updated correctly:
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the reminder was sent
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the owner of the bookmark replied to the topic
This adds another migration to fix the out-of-sync column and also some refactors to BookmarkManager to allow for more of these delete cases. BookmarkManager is used instead of directly destroying the bookmark in PostCreator and BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler.
This changes PG text search to only match the given title against
lexemes that are formed from the title. Likewise, the given raw will
only be matched against lexemes that are formed from the post's raw.
If a user posted a topic and Akismet decided it was spam, the topic gets deleted and put into the review queue. If a category moderator for that category marked the post/topic as "Not Spam" the topic did not get recovered correctly because Guardian.new(@user).can_review_topic?(@post.topic) returned false incorrectly because the topic was deleted.
This adds a special filter to topic lists that will filter to tracked and
watched categories.
To use it you can visit:
`https://sitename/?filter=tracked`
`https://sitename/unread?filter=tracked`
and so on
Note, we do not include explicitly tracked and watched topics **outside** of
the tracked categories and tags.
We can consider a `filter=all_tracked` to cover this edge case.
To reproduce the initial issue here:
1. A user makes a post, which discourse-akismet marks as spam (I cheated and called `DiscourseAkismet::PostsBouncer.new.send(:mark_as_spam, post)` for this)
2. The post lands in the review queue
3. The category the topic is in has a `reviewable_by_group_id`
4. A user in that group goes and looks at the Review queue, decides the post is not spam, and clicks Not Spam
5. Weird stuff happens because the `PostDestroyer#recover` method didn't handle this (the user who clicked Not Spam was not the owner of the post and was not a staff member, so the post didn't get un-destroyed and post counts didn't get updated)
Now users who belong to a group who can review a category now have the ability to recover/delete posts fully.
Previously we considered 'upload rows without etags' to be exempt from the check. This is bad, because older/migrated sites might not have etags on all their uploads. We should consider rows without etags to be broken, since we can't check them against the inventory.
This also removes the `by_users` scope. We need all uploads to be working, even ones created by the system user.
This adds an option to "delete on owner reply" to bookmarks. If you select this option in the modal, then reply to the topic the bookmark is in, the bookmark will be deleted on reply.
This PR also changes the checkboxes for these additional bookmark options to an Integer column in the DB with a combobox to select the option you want.
The use cases are:
* Sometimes I will bookmark the topics to read it later. In this case we definitely don’t need to keep the bookmark after I replied to it.
* Sometimes I will read the topic in mobile and I will prefer to reply in PC later. Or I may have to do some research before reply. So I will bookmark it for reply later.
* FEATURE: Allow List for PMs
This feature adds a new user setting that is disabled by default that
allows them to specify a list of users that are allowed to send them
private messages. This way they don't have to maintain a large list of
users they don't want to here from and instead just list the people they
know they do want. Staff will still always be able to send messages to
the user.
* Update PR based on feedback
