This PR backtracks a fair bit on this one https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/13220/files.
Instead of sending the group SMTP email for each user via `UserNotifications`, we are changing to send only one email with the existing `Jobs::GroupSmtpEmail` job and `GroupSmtpMailer`. We are changing this job and mailer along with `PostAlerter` to make the first topic allowed user the `to_address` for the email and any other `topic_allowed_users` to be the CC address on the email. This is to cut down on emails sent via SMTP, which is subject to daily limits from providers such as Gmail. We log these details in the `EmailLog` table now.
In addition to this, we have changed `PostAlerter` to no longer rely on incoming email email addresses for sending the `GroupSmtpEmail` job. This was unreliable as a user's email could have changed in the meantime. Also it was a little overcomplicated to use the incoming email records -- it is far simpler to reason about to just use topic allowed users.
This also adds a fix to include cc_addresses in the EmailLog.addressed_to_user scope.
There is a big difference between regular watched words and regular
expressions and this has been confusing in the past. This notice adds
an explanation.
This commit also reorganizes the code of the test modal.
* FEATURE: Staff can receive pending user reminders more frequently.
We now express the "pending_users_reminder_delay" in minutes instead of hours so staff can have finer control over the delay.
We need to keep in mind that the reminders could still take up to 20 minutes, even when using a lower value. We send them from a scheduled job.
* Migrate to a new site setting for the reminders delay
We want to submit the flag modal on pressing CTRL + ENTER and CMD + ENTER.
Here's how our modals work:
Every modal can be dismissed by pressing ESC. This behaviour can be disabled for a specific modal if we need to.
Every modal can be submitted by pressing ENTER if the cursor wasn't on a text area or a form at the moment of pressing.
Now, the flag modal is actually a one big form and pressing ENTER doesn't submit it. I've added submitting by CTRL+ENTER but at first it was interfering with the basic modal submitting by ENTER. It's a pretty tricky thing to fix because we use the keyup event for submitting by ENTER and we need to use the keydown event for submitting with modifiers (because submitting by CMD+ENTER on Macs doesn't work with keyup).
Eventually, I fixed the problem just by adding a possibility to disable default submitting on ENTER (in the same way as we already have the possibility of disabling dismissing on ESC). Then I disabled default submitting for the flag form and implemented submitting by CTRL+ENTER and CMD+ENTER. This way everything is simple and robust. I did it only for the flag modal but it'll be easy and safe to add the same behaviour to another modal.
ATM it only implements server side of it, as my need is for automation purposes. However it should probably be added in the UI too as it's unexpected to have pinned_until and no bannered_until.
This PR improves navigation within lightboxes that contain multiple images for both touch and non-touch devices.
Currently, if a gallery contains multiple large images, and you click on the one currently displayed, two things happen.
1. we zoom in
2. we navigate to the next image
a0bbc346cb/app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/lib/lightbox.js (L43-L49)
So, you get taken to the next image, and it shows zoomed in, even when the intention was to zoom in on the previous image.
Magnific popup has an option to disable image-click navigation in galleries. This PR toggles that on for non-touch devices.
The result is that if you click on an image in a gallery on a non-touch device, we zoom in on that image instead of navigating to the next one.
This has no impact on arrow/keyboard navigation.
Magnific popup also has an API when images change; we reset the zoom class when that happens. So, when you navigate to the next image, it won't be zoomed in.
For touch devices, clicking on the image will navigate to the next one without zooming in. Users can pinch-zoom if they want to see more details on touch devices.
I used jQuery for this because both Magnific popup and our implementation for this are based on jQuery. No point making a few lines use vanilla for this when the rest doesn't.
Add Members could also invite new users via emails, but that was a less
known fact. Splitting the previous modal into two more accessible
modals should make this feature more discoverable.
Badges that are awarded multiple times can be favorite and not favorite
at the same time. This caused few problems when users tried to favorite
them as they were counted multiple times or their state was incorrectly
displayed.
Effectively reverts 3ddc33b07c
Makes the failure states testable; see the uncommented test.
I don't think we're re-catching these errors anyway?
_update:_
We did in a single instance in discourse-code-review but it wasn't really intentional and I fixed it in https://github.com/discourse/discourse-code-review/pull/73
* pretender wasn't catching the request because it ran after this test finished
* restore wasn't needed, we do `sinon.restore()` after each test
The error was:
```
↪ Unit | Model | user::resolvedTimezone [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | url::routeTo with prefixUnhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/chuck.json (PUT)
Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/chuck.json (PUT)
at Pretender.server.unhandledRequest (discourse/tests/setup-tests:173:15)
at Pretender.handleRequest (pretender:400:14)
at FakeRequest.send (pretender:169:21)
at Object.send (jquery:10100:10)
at Function.ajax (jquery:9683:15)
at performAjax (discourse/app/lib/ajax:174:19)
at eval (discourse/app/lib/ajax:183:11)
at invokeCallback (ember:63104:17)
at publish (ember:63087:9)
at eval (ember:57463:16)
[✘]
```
A minimal reproduction:
`http://localhost:3001/qunit?seed=3&testId=da76996b&testId=e52a53e7`
This adds the following columns to EmailLog:
* cc_addresses
* cc_user_ids
* topic_id
* raw
This is to bring the EmailLog table closer in parity to
IncomingEmail so it can be better utilized for Group SMTP
and IMAP mailing.
The raw column contains the full content of the outbound email,
but _only_ if the new hidden site setting
enable_raw_outbound_email_logging is enabled. Most sites do not
need it, and it's mostly required for IMAP and SMTP sending.
In the next pull request, there will be a migration to backfill
topic_id on the EmailLog table, at which point we can remove the
topic fallback method on EmailLog.
The exception page is shown before Ember can actually figure out what the final destination URL we're going to is.
This means that the new page is not present in the history stack, so if we attempt to use the history stack to go back, we will actually navigate back by two steps.
By instead forcing a navigation to the current URL, we achieve the goal of going "back" with no history mucking.
Unfortunately, the actual URL that was attempted is not available. Additionally, this only works for the on-screen back button and not the browser back.
Additionally, several modernizations of the exception page code were made.
This was previously broken by 59ef48c0b9 (#11425, #11424).
Centralize the logic into the exception controller, which avoids the problematic bug and makes it easy to add additional detailed 404 pages in the future.
Sometimes oneboxes contain the same link multiple times and the link
count was shown for each of them. This commit adds link count only to
the most important link, that being either a heading or the header of
the onebox.
Before this change, calling `StyleSheet::Manager.stylesheet_details`
for the first time resulted in multiple queries to the database. This is
because the code was modelled in a way where each `Theme` was loaded
from the database one at a time.
This PR restructures the code such that it allows us to load all the
theme records in a single query. It also allows us to eager load the
required associations upfront. In order to achieve this, I removed the
support of loading multiple themes per request. It was initially added
to support user selectable theme components but the feature was never
completed and abandoned because it wasn't a feature that we thought was
worth building.
