The poll breakdown modal replaces the grouped pie charts feature.
Includes:
* MODAL: Untangle `onSelectPanel`
Previously modal-tab component would call on click the onSelectPanel callback with itself (modal-tab) as `this` which severely limited its usefulness. Now showModal binds the callback to its controller.
"The PR includes a fix/change to d-modal (b7f6ec6) that hasn't been extracted to a separate PR because it's not currently possible to test a change like this in abstract, i.e. with dynamically created controllers/components in tests. The percentage/count toggle test for the poll breakdown feature is essentially a test for that d-modal modification."
* Remove unused Discourse.SiteSettings
* Remove `Discourse.SiteSettings` from many tests
* REFACTOR: `lib:formatter` was using a lot of leaky state
* Remove more `Discourse.SiteSettings` from tests
* More SiteSettings removed from tests
This required properly plumbing the guardian into the serializer.
Notably, the default state in the client was not changed - if you haven't voted in
the poll, you need to click the button to view the results instead of the results
being immediately visible on page load.
Implements https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/138108
This new iteration of select-kit focuses on following best principales and disallowing mutations inside select-kit components. A best effort has been made to avoid breaking changes, however if you content was a flat array, eg: ["foo", "bar"] You will need to set valueProperty=null and nameProperty=null on the component.
Also almost every component should have an `onChange` handler now to decide what to do with the updated data. **select-kit will not mutate your data by itself anymore**
* DEV: Fix the function prototype observers deprecation
DEPRECATION: Function prototype extensions have been deprecated, please migrate from function(){}.observes('foo') to observer('foo', function() {}). [deprecation id: function-prototype-extensions.observes] See https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x/#toc_function-prototype-extensions-observes for more details.
* DEV: Fix the function prototype event listeners deprecation
DEPRECATION: Function prototype extensions have been deprecated, please migrate from function(){}.on('foo') to on('foo', function() {}). [deprecation id: function-prototype-extensions.on] See https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x/#toc_function-prototype-extensions-on for more details.
* DEV: Simplify `default as` imports
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
The bug was mentioned here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/poll-name/136436
I added specs to cover existing behaviour and refactored can_see_results method.
Guard condition should apply only if the poll result setting is set to `staff_only`.
In other cases, user can see results when the poll result setting is set to `always` or user voted or poll is closed.
This commit mostly get rid of the later() call and encapsulate all pie chart display logic inside discourse-poll-pie-canvas widget instead of sharing it between discourse-poll-pie-chart and discourse-poll-pie-canvas
For various reasons, users may want to change their response to a poll.
Currently they have permission to do so, however it is hidden behind the 'Hide
results' button. Since what this button does is take the user back to the vote
panel, it seems more appropriate to name it 'Show vote', where it becomes
obvious that it can be modified and re-submitted.
As discussed here [1], there are mulitple users, myself included, who assumed
that editing a misclick response was impossible. This improves the label to make
it more descriptive of the action actually being taken.
[1] https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-remove-my-choice-in-a-poll/53642/6
This PR aims to make poll results easily exportable to staff in a CSV format, so they can be analyzed in external software.
It also makes the export data easily customizable by allowing users to leverage any data explorer query to generate the report. By default, we use a query that ships with data explorer, but user can change the ID in settings or use 0 to disable this feature.
One potential upgrade is using the recent work that allows arbitrary group to run data explorer and allow all the groups with access to the configured query to also export polls, but that can be added later.
Co-Authored-By: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
* DEV: Provide radix 10 argument to parseInt
* DEV: Provide radix 16 argument to parseInt
* DEV: Remove unnecessary parseInt calls
* Fix year formatting
parseInt was used here to convert decimals to ints
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains.
We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard
Ruby patterns to require files.
This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
* FEATURE: Staff only poll results
These changes allow only staff to see the results of a poll.
Non-staff users will be shown a screen like this:
1b8bd76013.png
The "Votes are public" message has been removed from the info section,
and the button to show the votes has been replaced with a message
stating the results will only be shown to staff.
* Update PR based on feedback
* Update plugins/poll/app/models/poll.rb
make sure we return a boolean
Co-Authored-By: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
The migration script is not idempotent due to database constrains on the
poll related objects, namely:
polls: index_polls_on_post_id_and_name (post_id,name) UNIQUE
poll_options: index_poll_options_on_poll_id_and_digest (poll_id,digest) UNIQUE
poll_votes: index_poll_votes_on_poll_id_and_poll_option_id_and_user_id (poll_id,poll_option_id,user_id) UNIQUE
This change skips a particular poll migration if it's already found on
the db.
* Calling `Discourse.reset()` creates a new container
We should run our de-initializers only after acceptance tests,
since initializers are not run outside of acceptance tests anyway,
and the container at this point can be passed properly to the
`teardown()` method.
* Remove `Discourse.reset` from tests
This would cause a new container to be created which leaks many objects.
* `updateCurrentUser` is more accurate than `replaceCurrentUser`
