* FEATURE: display warning when sharing a topic in a restricted category
If a topic belongs to a category that is not readable by everyone, display a text warning of "Only visible to members of groups: [group_a], [group_b]"
* DEV: Adding a new category means we need to bump this value
* DEV: pass category to showModal
- ensures arrow up/down doesn’t also apply to textarea while autocomplete is opened
- ensures esc is closing autocomplete and also not closing composer while autocomplete is opened
- Removes jquery
- Removes a not unregistered listener and uses component event
- Removes external-url class as it was only valid in one case of the dropdown
- Uses @action
- Tagless
- Other minor changes
After permanently deleting the first post of a topic the user was
sometimes stuck on the page because of an infinite loop. This problem
happened more often in Firefox.
This patch takes the small component we had for sticky avatars and adds
it into our core code base.
A small refactor has been made to have a `StickyAvatars` dedicated class.
When uploading emoji with the new uppy upload mixin, we were
not sending the name of the emoji in the payload, or more
accurately uppy was already using the file name as the name
value and we were not overriding it from data. This commit
changes the behaviour for single files uploaded via the uppy
upload mixin, by merging the file's meta object with this.data
from the parent component.
When there are multiple groups on a topic, we were selecting
the first from the topic allowed groups to act as the sender
email address when sending group SMTP replies via PostAlerter.
However, this was not ordered, and since there is no created_at
column on TopicAllowedGroup we cannot order this nicely, which
caused just a random group to be used (based on whatever postgres
decided it felt like that morning).
This commit changes the group used for SMTP sending to be the
group using the email_username of the to address of the first
incoming email for the topic, if there are more than one allowed
groups on the topic. Otherwise it just uses the only SMTP enabled
group.
Sometimes, a user may have a malformed email such as
`test@test.com<mailto:test@test.com` their email address,
and as a topic participant will be included as a CC email
when sending a GroupSmtpEmail. This causes the CC parsing to
fail and further down the line in Email::Sender the code
to check the CC addresses expects an array but gets a string
instead because of the parse failure.
Instead, we can just check if the CC addresses are valid
and drop them if they are not in the GroupSmtpEmail job.
This only affects multisite Discourse instances (where multiple forums are served from a single application server). The vast majority of self-hosted Discourse forums do not fall into this category.
On affected instances, this vulnerability could allow encrypted session cookies to be re-used between sites served by the same application instance.
Also removes "appEventsCache". (and reduces the reported test memory usage by ~33%)
There's no longer any need to remove appEvent listeners in application-instance initializers' `teardown`, as app instances are recreated before each test (in both legacy and ember cli envs)
Uppy and Resumable slice up their chunks differently, which causes a difference
in this algorithm. Let's take a 131.6MB file (137951695 bytes) with a 5MB (5242880 bytes)
chunk size. For resumable, there are 26 chunks, and uppy there are 27. This is
controlled by forceChunkSize in resumable which is false by default. The final
chunk size is 6879695 (chunk size + remainder) whereas in uppy it is 1636815 (just remainder).
This means that the current condition of uploaded_file_size + current_chunk_size >= total_size
is hit twice by uppy, because it uses a more correct number of chunks. This
can be solved for both uppy and resumable by checking the _previous_ chunk
number * chunk_size as the uploaded_file_size.
An example of what is happening before that change, using the current
chunk number to calculate uploaded_file_size.
chunk 26: resumable: uploaded_file_size (26 * 5242880) + current_chunk_size (6879695) = 143194575 >= total_size (137951695) ? YES
chunk 26: uppy: uploaded_file_size (26 * 5242880) + current_chunk_size (5242880) = 141557760 >= total_size (137951695) ? YES
chunk 27: uppy: uploaded_file_size (27 * 5242880) + current_chunk_size (1636815) = 143194575 >= total_size (137951695) ? YES
An example of what this looks like after the change, using the previous
chunk number to calculate uploaded_file_size:
chunk 26: resumable: uploaded_file_size (25 * 5242880) + current_chunk_size (6879695) = 137951695 >= total_size (137951695) ? YES
chunk 26: uppy: uploaded_file_size (25 * 5242880) + current_chunk_size (5242880) = 136314880 >= total_size (137951695) ? NO
chunk 27: uppy: uploaded_file_size (26 * 5242880) + current_chunk_size (1636815) = 137951695 >= total_size (137951695) ? YES
