We used to show New Features in a tab on the dashboard,
but this could get pushed down the page especially on
our hosting. In 043117ca13
we made a separate What's New page, so this commit removes
the dashboard tab and changes the admin notification to
send the admin to /admin/whats-new instead of the dashboard
tab.
This commit fixes a bug in the redesigned about page where if there's no banner image configured for the page, the top of the page where the banner goes is occupied with large white space. Additionally, this commit also fixes a related bug in the admin config area for the /about page where it's not possible to remove the uploaded banner image.
This commit continues on work laid out by 6039b513fe to redesign the /about page. In this commit, we add sections for showing the site admins and moderators.
The lists of admins and moderators display the 10 most recently seen admins/moderators, with a button to display the rest of admins or moderators. Admins or moderators that have not logged in to the site in the last year will not be shown. Clicking on an admin's or moderator's name/avatar will show their user card.
Very similar to move up/down flag problem fixed here - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/28272
Those are the steps to toggle the flag:
1. click toggle - `saving` CSS class is added;
2. request to backend;
3. `saving` CSS class is removed.
And check if the flag was toggle was:
```ruby
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
has_no_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
end
```
If the save action is very fast, then the saving class is removed before the first check.
Therefore I decided to invert it, and once action is finished add `saved` CSS class.
Then we can have a quick positive check:
```ruby
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saved")
end
```
Those are the steps to move the flag:
1. open menu;
2. click move up - `saving` CSS class is added;
3. request to backend;
4. `saving` CSS class is removed.
To check if the action was finished we are using this method:
```
def move_up(key)
open_flag_menu(key)
find(".admin-flag-item__move-up").click
has_saved_flag?(key)
self
end
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
has_no_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
end
```
However, sometimes specs were failing with `expected to find CSS ".admin-flag-item.spam.saving" but there were no matches`
I think that the problem is with those 2 lines:
```
find(".admin-flag-item__move-up").click
has_closed_flag_menu?
```
If the save action is very fast, then the `saving` class is removed before the first check.
Therefore, to determine that the move action is finished, I am checking if the menu is closed.
This commit continues on work laid out by 6039b513fe to redesign the /about page. In this commit, we add the site age and a section on the right hand side to show site activities/statistics such as topics, posts, sign-ups, likes etc.
Admin can create up to 50 custom flags. It is limited for performance reasons.
When the limit is reached "Add button" is disabled and backend is protected by guardian.
In the formkit conversion in 2ca06ba236
we missed setting a type for the UppyImageUploader for badges. Also,
we were not passing down the `image_url` as form data, so when we used
`data.image` for that field the badge was not updating in the UI after
page loads and the image URL was not loading for preview.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Form Kit is our new form library/framework for unifying the way forms look across Discourse. The admin config area for the /about page is a new form that isn't currently used, so it makes sense for it to be one of the first forms to be migrated to Form Kit to test the library.
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Replaces the existing topic map with the experimental-topic-map made by @awesomerobot.
---------
Co-authored-by: awesomerobot <kris.aubuchon@discourse.org>
This commit introduces the foundation for a new design for the /about page that we're currently working on. The current version will remain available and still be the default until we finish the new version and are ready to roll out. To opt into the new version right now, add one or more group to the `experimental_redesigned_about_page_groups` site setting and members in those groups will get the new version.
Internal topic: t/128545.
This PR introduces FormKit, a component-based form library designed to simplify form creation and management. This library provides a single `Form` component, various field components, controls, validation mechanisms, and customization options. Additionally, it includes helpers to facilitate testing and writing specifications for forms.
1. **Form Component**:
- The main component that encapsulates form logic and structure.
- Yields various utilities like `Field`, `Submit`, `Alert`, etc.
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
import Form from "discourse/form";
<template>
<Form as |form|>
<form.Field
@name="username"
@title="Username"
@validation="required"
as |field|
>
<field.Input />
</form.Field>
<form.Field @name="age" @title="Age" as |field|>
<field.Input @type="number" />
</form.Field>
<form.Submit />
</Form>
</template>
```
2. **Validation**:
- Built-in validation rules such as `required`, `number`, `length`, and `url`.
- Custom validation callbacks for more complex validation logic.
**Example Usage**:
```javascript
validateUsername(name, value, data, { addError }) {
if (data.bar / 2 === value) {
addError(name, "That's not how maths work.");
}
}
```
```hbs
<form.Field @name="username" @validate={{this.validateUsername}} />
```
3. **Customization**:
- Plugin outlets for extending form functionality.
- Styling capabilities through propagated attributes.
- Custom controls with properties provided by `form` and `field`.
**Example Usage**:
```hbs
<Form class="my-form" as |form|>
<form.Field class="my-field" as |field|>
<MyCustomControl id={{field.id}} @onChange={{field.set}} />
</form.Field>
</Form>
```
4. **Helpers for Testing**:
- Test assertions for form and field validation.
**Example usage**:
```javascript
assert.form().hasErrors("the form shows errors");
assert.form().field("foo").hasValue("bar", "user has set the value");
```
- Helper for interacting with he form
**Example usage**:
```javascript
await formKit().field("foo").fillIn("bar");
```
5. **Page Object for System Specs**:
- Page objects for interacting with forms in system specs.
- Methods for submitting forms, checking alerts, and interacting with fields.
**Example Usage**:
```ruby
form = PageObjects::Components::FormKit.new(".my-form")
form.submit
expect(form).to have_an_alert("message")
```
**Field Interactions**:
```ruby
field = form.field("foo")
expect(field).to have_value("bar")
field.fill_in("bar")
```
6. **Collections handling**:
- A specific component to handle array of objects
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
<Form @data={{hash foo=(array (hash bar=1) (hash bar=2))}} as |form|>
<form.Collection @name="foo" as |collection|>
<collection.Field @name="bar" @title="Bar" as |field|>
<field.Input />
</collection.Field>
</form.Collection>
</Form>
```
The watch words controller creation function, create_or_update_word(), doesn’t validate the size of the replacement parameter, unlike the word parameter, when creating a replace watched word. So anyone with moderator privileges can create watched words with almost unlimited characters.
Handles the cases where the sections titles are Unicode only strings, allowing them to be expanded separately if the Unicode string contains letters.
Also prevents a sidebar section with the header hidden to be displayed collapsed.
There's currently a race condition in the following spec:
65be7a7880/spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb (L70-L95)
where the form can be saved before the image uploader field has finished uploading the selected image and causing the assertion at line 94 to fail with the following error:
```
Failure/Error: expect(SiteSetting.about_banner_image.sha1).to eq(Upload.generate_digest(image_file))
NoMethodError:
undefined method `sha1' for nil
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_admin_about_config_area_page_the_general_settings_card_can_saves_its_fields_to_their_corresponding_site_settings_312.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
http://localhost:31338/assets/vendor.js 15902:14 "WARNING: uppy needs a unique id, pass one in to the component implementing this mixin"
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
./spec/system/admin_about_config_area_spec.rb:94:in `block (3 levels) in <main>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:552:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:513:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:503:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/rails_helper.rb:460:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/webmock-3.23.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
This PR fixes the problem by making the system test wait for the image to finish uploading (with 10 seconds timeout) before carrying out the rest of the system test.
I am changing many of these to notes or resolving them as is,
most of these I have not actively worked on in years so someone
else can work on them when we get to these areas again.
This commit continues work laid out by ffec8163b0 for the admin config page for the /about page. The last commit set up the user interface, and this one sets up all the wiring needed to make the input fields and save buttons actually work.
Internal topic: t/128544.
While creating a new category if the user didn't specify a value for `minimum_required_tags` input but clicked it then it returned the "PG::NotNullViolation: null value in column 'minimum_required_tags'" error.
When visiting a user profile, and then opening the search, there's an option to filter down by posts made by that user.
When clicking that option, it used to pre-fill the "search bar" with "@<username>" to filter down the search.
This restore this behaviour and add a system spec to ensure it doesn't regress.
Context - https://meta.discourse.org/t/in-posts-by-search-option-does-not-work-when-clicked/312916
We want to allow admins to make new required fields apply to existing users. In order for this to work we need to have a way to make those users fill up the fields on their next page load. This is very similar to how adding a 2FA requirement post-fact works. Users will be redirected to a page where they can fill up the remaining required fields, and until they do that they won't be able to do anything else.
Many site settings can be distructive or have huge side-effects
for a site that the admin may not be aware of when changing it.
This commit introduces a `requires_confirmation` attribute that
can be added to any site setting. When it is true, a confirmation
dialog will open if that setting is changed in the admin UI,
optionally with a custom message that is defined in client.en.yml.
If the admin does not confirm, we reset the setting to its previous
clean value and do not save the new value.
When we turn on settings automatically for customers,
we sometimes use `.set_and_log` which will make a staff
action log for the site setting change. This is fine, but
there is no context for customers.
This change allows setting a message with `.set_and_log`, which
will be stored in the `details` column of the staff action log
created, which will show up on `/admin/logs/staff_action_logs`
---------
Co-authored-by: Kelv <kelv@discourse.org>
* FEATURE: Add Filter for Webhook Events by Status
* Fixing multiple issues
* Lint
* Fixing multiple issues
* Change the range of the status for webhook events
We want to get rid of the old topic bulk actions modal
and use the new dropdown (currently gated behind
experimental_topic_bulk_actions_enabled_groups). To do
this we need to use the new dropdown in all places in the
UI.
This commit changes the full page search UI to use the new
topic bulk actions dropdown if experimental_topic_bulk_actions_enabled_groups
is enabled, and makes some minor refactors to make this work.
Also add a spec for both the old and new functionality.
This commit fixes a problem where the user will not be able to reset
their password when they only have security keys and backup codes
configured.
This commit also makes the following changes/fixes:
1. Splits password reset system tests to
`spec/system/forgot_password_spec.rb` instead of missing the system
tests in `spec/system/login_spec.rb` which is mainly used to test
the login flow.
2. Fixes a UX issue where the `Use backup codes` or `Use authenticator
app` text is shown on the reset password form when the user does
not have either backup codes or an authenticator app configured.
Continued work on moderate flags UI.
In this PR admins are allowed to change the order of flags. The notify user flag is always on top but all other flags can be moved.
Prior to this fix we were opening a modal before closing the `DMenu` modal, given `DModal` expects only one modal at a time it was closing the latest modal and instantly closing the one we just opened.
We're planning to implement a feature that allows adding required fields for existing users. This PR does some preparatory refactoring to make that possible. There should be no changes to existing behaviour. Just a small update to the admin UI.
(experimental)
The initial implementation of glimmer topic-list and related components. Does not include new APIs and isn't compatible with existing customization. That's gonna come in future PRs.
Enabled by adding groups to `experimental_glimmer_topic_list_groups` setting.
- login with username/password
- login with username/password and 2FA
- login with username/password back up code
- login with magic link
- login with magic link and 2FA
- login with magic link and back up code
- login when 2FA is required
- reset password
---
- signup and activate account
- signup with invite code
- signup with invite link
- signup and approve account
- signup and auto approve account
- signup with blocked domain
---
- basic login with Facebook
- basic login with Google
- basic login with Github
- basic login with Twitter
- basic login with Discord
- basic login with Linkedin
Some sites are still on the legacy "hamburger dropdown"
navigation_menu setting. In this case to avoid confusion,
we want to show both the sidebar icon and the header dropdown
hamburger when visiting the admin portal. Otherwise, the
hamburger switches sides from right to left for admins
and takes on different behaviour.
The hamburger in this case _only_ shows the main panel, not
other sidebar panels like the admin one.
DropdownMenu component is meant as a way to describe the content of menus.
Syntax:
```
<DropdownMenu as |dm|>
<dm.item class="test">
First
</dm.item>
<dm.divider class="foo" />
<dm.item class="bar">
Second
</dm.item>
</DropdownMenu>
```
This commits updates
`PageObjects::Components::NavigationMenu::Base#click_edit_tags_button`
to wait for `.sidebar-tags-form` to be present before returning. This is
essential because the client side app has to load the tags from the
server when the modal is open. If we don't wait for all the tags to be
loaded, it makes it hard to reason about the state of the UI when
interacting with the modal. In the case of "allows a user to deselect all tags in the modal which will display the site's top tags" which
was flaky, the system test was interacting with the UI when the tags are
still loading.
* Simplify config nav link generation to always inject the Settings
tab
* Auto-redirect to the first non-settings config link (if there is one)
when the user lands on /admin/plugins/:plugin_id
* Add `extras` to admin plugin serializer so plugins can add more
data on first load
* Add PikadayCalendar page object for system specs, extracted from the
CalendarDateTimePicker to make it more generic.
A change in relative picker was causing a serie of events which ultimately would cause the whole list of time options to be reset and re-rendered which would cause a new instance of the picker to be created, causing a reset.
The fix is using id in the each loop to help ember identify that it doesn’t have to re-render a specific component.
Followup to 67a8080e33
This commit makes it so the topic footer button for bookmarks
uses the new BookmarkMenu component, and makes some tweaks to
that component to allow for a label and CSS class options.
Also introduces a TopicBookmarkManager to manage the saving/editing/
deleting of the topic level bookmarks and the reactivity that happens
in the topic UI afterward.
Next commit should rip out old bookmark associated code in the
topic controller as it will no longer be needed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
To add a components link to the sidebar refactoring was required to create unique URLs for themes and components. Before the query param was used. After changes, we have two URLs `/admin/customize/themes` and `/admin/customize/components`.
This commit will now change two behaviors:
- If composer is already opened on a specific post and we click on edit again for the same post, we will do nothing and not show the discard draft modal
- if composer is shrinked and we click on edit for the same currently edited post, we will just open the composer and not show the discard draft modal
The bulk actions menu for topics has multiple options to work
with tags on topics (append, replace, remove). Our tagging system
along with categories allows for some complicated tag restrictions
to be applied via tag groups. This was a problem for the topic bulk
actions because you couldn't append restricted tags to topics.
This commit allows restricted tags to be used in bulk tagging actions
as long as all selected topics are for a sole category. The category
information will be shown in the modal, and the category ID is used
for the tag search.
When choosing the "Custom..." option in the new bookmark
menu and then choosing a date + time in the modal for the
reminder, the bookmark icon on the post was not updating to
show the one with the clock to indicate the reminder.
This was just a data syncing issue between BookmarkFormData
and what the modal sets. Ideally all this would be refactored
because the data flow is messy...but hard to find time for
that right now.
Followup 67a8080e33
Display additional confirmation when:
- The public section is going to be updated;
- The public section is going to be deleted;
- The public section is going to be marked as private.
Adds the new quick menu for bookmarking. When you bookmark
a post (chat message behaviour will come later) we show this new quick
menu and bookmark the item straight away.
You can then choose a reminder quick option, or choose Custom... to open
the old modal. If you click on an existing bookmark, we show the same quick menu
but with Edit and Delete options.
A later PR will introduce a new bookmark modal, but for now we
are using the old modal for Edit and Custom... options.
Why this change?
Before this change, the validation error message shown to the user when
saving a theme objects setting is very cryptic. This commit changes the
validation error messages to be displayed on top of the editor instead.
Note that I don't think this way of displaying is the ideal state we
want to get to but given the time we have this will do for now.
Why this change?
In cdba864598, we added support for adding
a description which will be displayed under the input of each property
on the client side.
Currently this convention in the locale file is followed:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
objects_setting:
description: <description> for the setting
schema:
properties:
name: <description for the name property>
links:
name: <description for the name property in link>
url: <description for the url property in link>
```
Since we now want to allow the label to be translated as well, we will
be changing the convention to the following:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
objects_setting:
description: <description> for the setting
schema:
properties:
name:
label: <label for the name property>
description: <description for the name property>
links:
name:
label: <label for the name property>
description: <description for the name property in link>
url:
label: <label for the url property>
description: <description for the url property in link>
```
If the locale file does not provide a `label` key under the property's
name, the client side will just display the property's name as the
label for the input field.
Why this change?
Previously, we were preloading the necessary metadata for
`adminCustomizeThemes.show.schema` route in the
`adminCustomizeThemes.show` route. This is wasteful because we're
loading data upfront when the objects setting editor may not be used.
This change also lays the ground work for a future commit where we need
to be shipping down additional metadata which may further add to the
payload.
This commit mainly improves three things:
- slide up/down animation of the modals on mobile, also allowing swipe down to close the modal
- body scroll locked modals, it means that only the body of the modal can scroll
- a new `<:headerPrimaryAction>` block for `d-modal` which when present will move the cancel button to the left of the modal title, and this primary action to the right of the title
Why this change?
In our schema, we support the `min_length` and `max_length` validation
rules like so:
```
some_objects_setting
type: objects
schema:
name: some_object
properties:
title:
type: string
validations:
min_length: 1
max_length: 10
```
While the validations used to validate the objects on the server side,
we should also add client side validation for better UX.
Why this change?
This is a first pass at styling the editor for creating/editing/updating
an objects typed theme setting. Only the desktop view is being
considered at the current moment.
The objects typed theme setting is still behind a feature flag at this moment so there is no need for us to get the styling perfect. The purpose of this PR is to get us to a state which we can quickly iterate with a designer on.
This commit makes it so the site settings filter controls and
the list of settings input editors themselves can be used elsewhere
in the admin UI outside of /admin/site_settings
This allows us to provide more targeted groups of settings in different
UI areas where it makes sense to provide them, such as on plugin pages.
You could open a single page for a plugin where you can see information
about that plugin, change settings, and configure it with custom UIs
in the one place.
In future we will do this in "config areas" for other parts of the
admin UI.
Why this change?
When editing a objects typed theme setting, the input fields which are
rendered should include a description so that the user knows the purpose
of the field which they are changing.
What does this change do?
This change adds support for adding description to each property in the
schema for an object by following a given convention in the locale file.
For a schema like this:
```
objects_setting:
type: objects
schema:
name: section
properties:
name:
type: string
required: true
links:
type: objects
schema:
name: link
properties:
name:
type: string
required: true
validations:
max_length: 20
url:
type: string
```
Description for each property in the object can be added like so:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
objects_setting:
description: <description> for the setting
schema:
properties:
name: <description for the name property>
links:
name: <description for the name property in link>
url: <description for the url property in link>
```
If the a description is not present, the input field will simply not
have an description.
Also note that a description for a theme setting can now be added like
so:
```
en:
theme_metadata:
settings:
some_other_setting: <This will be used as the description>
objects_setting:
description: <This will also be used as the description>
```
Why this change?
Prior to this change, there is no description being displayed for
objects typed theme setting because we were rendering a button instead
of the components for the various setting types which will render the
setting's description.
What does this change do?
1. Introduce `SiteSettings::Description` compoment to centralise the HTML
being rendered across all settings component.
2. Renders the `SiteSettings::Description` component after the edit
button in `site_setting.hbs`.
Why this change?
On the `/admin/customize/themes/<:id>` route, we allow admins to edit
all settings via a settings editor. Prior to this change, trying to edit
and save a typed objects theme settings will result in an error on the
server.
This change creates a user setting that they can toggle if
they don't want to receive unread notifications when someone closes a
topic they have read and are watching/tracking it.
* A11Y: Update bulk selection keyboard shortcuts
Still a draft, but in current state this:
- adds `shift+b` as a keyboard shortcut to toggle bulk select
- adds `shift+d` as a keyboard shortcut to dismiss selected topic(s) (this
replaces `x r` and `x t` shortcuts)
- adds `x` as a keyboard shortcut to toggle selection (while in bulk select mode)
- fixes a bug with the `shift+a` shortcut, which was not working properly
Note that there is a breaking change here. Previously we had:
- `x r` to dismiss new topics
- `x t` to dismiss unread topics
However, this meant that we couldn't use `x` for selection, because the
itsatrap library does not allow the same character to be used both as a
single character shortcut and as the start of a sequence. The proposed
solution here is more consistent with other apps (Gmail, Github) that use
`x` to toggle selection.
Also, we never show both "Dismiss New" and "Dismiss Unread" in the same
screen, hence it makes sense to consolidate both actions under `shift+d`.
* Address review
Why this change?
Before this change, the new navigation item in the topic list will be
hidden when there are no new or unread topics for the user. We have
started to find this behaviour confusing UX wise so we decided to stop
hiding it.
Why this change?
This is a regression from introduced in
5c1147adf3 where dismissing unread topics
was changing the notification level of the topics instead of just
dismissing the unread posts.
What does this change do?
1. Bring back the previous implementation of the action
2. Fix the system test that was supposed to catch the problem but did
not.
Before, the `back to forum` link was part of experimental admin navigation. It means that the link could be filtered out.
Because it is essential navigation, it should not be part of sidebar links and should be moved above the filter.
Why this change?
The `/admin/customize/themes/:id/schema/name` route is a work in
progress but we want to be able to start navigating to it from the
`/admin/customize/themes/:id` route.
What does this change do?
1. Move `adminCustomizeThemes.schema` to a child route of
`adminCustomizeThemes.show`. This is because we need the model
from the parent route and if it isn't a child route we end up
having to load the theme model again from the server.
1. Add the `objects_schema` attribute to `ThemeSettingsSerializer`
1. Refactor `SiteSettingComponent` to be able to render a button
so that we don't have to hardcode the button rendering into the
`SiteSettings::String` component
