* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on backups
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on plugins list
* DEV: tweaks on admin table
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on chat plugin
* apply prettier
* apply lint
* DEV: removed commented out code
* DEV: removed unnecessary div element
* scroll to the element
* remove the workaround
* revert
* add an extra assertion
* add enabled check
* improve switching
* rm
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
Because of unreliability, the spec was temporarily disabled. However, it is ensuring that the custom flags system is working correctly. Therefore it would be great to enable it again.
I made a few fixes to try to mitigate this situation:
- Reduced amount of Redis calls;
- When deleting, ensure that the modal is closed before checking the result;
- Moved duplicated name tests to a separate block;
- Increased wait time to 3 times the default because I noticed that sometimes it gets stuck for a moment. Most of the time it is fast, but sometimes when I run tests in a loop 50 times I see slowness.
This commit converts the current chat plugin UI into the
new "show plugin" UI already followed by AI and Gamification.
In the process, I also:
* Made a dedicated /new route to create new webhooks
* Converted the webhook form to FormKit
* Made some fixes and improvements to the `AdminPluginConfigPage`, `AdminPageHeader`,
and `AdminPageSubheader` generic components, so more plugins can
adopt the UI guidelines too. This includes adding a header outlet so plugins
can add action buttons to the plugin show page header.
* Fixes the submit button loading state for FormKit (by Joffrey)
---------
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Very similar to move up/down flag problem fixed here - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/28272
Those are the steps to toggle the flag:
1. click toggle - `saving` CSS class is added;
2. request to backend;
3. `saving` CSS class is removed.
And check if the flag was toggle was:
```ruby
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
has_no_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
end
```
If the save action is very fast, then the saving class is removed before the first check.
Therefore I decided to invert it, and once action is finished add `saved` CSS class.
Then we can have a quick positive check:
```ruby
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saved")
end
```
Those are the steps to move the flag:
1. open menu;
2. click move up - `saving` CSS class is added;
3. request to backend;
4. `saving` CSS class is removed.
To check if the action was finished we are using this method:
```
def move_up(key)
open_flag_menu(key)
find(".admin-flag-item__move-up").click
has_saved_flag?(key)
self
end
def has_saved_flag?(key)
has_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
has_no_css?(".admin-flag-item.#{key}.saving")
end
```
However, sometimes specs were failing with `expected to find CSS ".admin-flag-item.spam.saving" but there were no matches`
I think that the problem is with those 2 lines:
```
find(".admin-flag-item__move-up").click
has_closed_flag_menu?
```
If the save action is very fast, then the `saving` class is removed before the first check.
Therefore, to determine that the move action is finished, I am checking if the menu is closed.
* `@ember/owner` instead of `@ember/application`
* `discourse-i18n` instead of `I18n`
* `{ service } from "@ember/service"` instead of `inject as service`
Before checking if flags were reordered on the topic page, we need to ensure that the reorder action was finished. To achieve it "saving" CSS is added and removed when AJAX call is completed.
Continued work on moderate flags UI.
In this PR admins are allowed to change the order of flags. The notify user flag is always on top but all other flags can be moved.
