Specifying more than two tag names when using the `tag:` filter was not
working because of a bug in the code where only the first two value in
the `tag:` filter was being selected.
What is the problem?
Consider the following timeline:
1. OP starts a topic.
2. Troll responds snarkily.
3. Flagger flags the post as “inappropriate”.
4. Admin agrees and hides the post.
5. Troll ninja-edits the post within the grace period, but still snarky.
6. Flagger flags the post as inappropriate again.
The current behaviour is that the flagger is met with an error saying the post has been reviewed and can't be flagged again for the same reason.
The desired behaviour is after someone has edited a post, it should be flaggable again.
Why is this happening?
This is related to the ninja-edit feature, where within a set grace period no new revision is created, but a new revision is required to flag the same post for the same reason.
So essentially there is a window between the naughty corner cooldown where a flagged post can't be edited, and the ninja-edit grace period, where an edit can be made without a new revision. Posts that are edited within this window can't be re-flagged by the same user.
|-----------------|-------------------------------|
^ Flag accepted | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🥷🏻 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| ^ Editing grace period over
^ Naughty corner cooldown over
How does this fix it?
We already create a new revision when ninja-editing a post with a pending flag. The issue above happens only in the case where the flag is already accepted.
This change extends the existing behaviour so that a new revision is created when ninja-editing any flagged post, regardless of the status of the flag. (Deleted flags excluded.)
This should also help with posterity, avoiding situations where a successfully flagged post looks innocuous in the history because it was ninja-edited, and vice versa.
* DEV: move sidebar community section to database
Before, community section was hard-coded. In the future, we are planning to allow admins to edit it. Therefore, it has to be moved to database to `custom_sections` table.
Few steps and simplifications has to be made:
- custom section was hidden behind `enable_custom_sidebar_sections` feature flag. It has to be deleted so all forums, see community section;
- migration to add `section_type` column to sidebar section to show it is a special type;
- migration to add `segment` column to sidebar links to determine if link should be displayed in primary section or in more section;
- simplify more section to have one level only (secondary section links are merged);
- ensure that links like `everything` are correctly tracking state;
- make user an anonymous links position consistence. For example, from now on `faq` link for user and anonymous is visible in more tab;
- delete old community-section template.
SearchIndexer is only automatically disabled in `before_all` and `before` blocks which means at the start
of test runs. Enabling the SearchIndexer in one `fab!` block will affect
all other `fab!` blocks which is not ideal as we may be indexing stuff
for search when we don't need to.
What is the problem?
The system tests incorrectly assumes that the discobot user which is
seeded by a core plugin will always be present. This is not true as the
discobot user will only be seeded when the test databases are migrated
with plugins enabled. If we migrate test databases without plugins being
enabled, the core system tests should still pass.
This header is used by Microsoft Exchange to indicate when certain types of
autoresponses should not be generated for an email.
It triggers our "is this mail autogenerated?" detection, but should not be used
for this purpose.
`TopicQuery#latest_results` which was being used by
`TopicQuery#list_filter` defaults to ordering by `Topic#bumped_at` in
descending order and that was taking precedent over the order scopes
being applied by `TopicsFilter`.
This allows multiple ordering to be specified by using a comma seperated string.
For example, `order:created,views` would order the topics by
`Topic#created_at` and then `Topic#views.
An older change about optimising images caused the selector that adds lightboxing not to apply on quoted images. This fixes that. The selector is now not applicable as optimisation occurs in a separate place.
This change allows quoted images to be opened in a lightbox.
This new modifier can be used by plugins to modify search ordering.
Specifically plugins such as discourse_solved can amend search ordering
so solved topics bump to the top.
Also correct edge case where low and high sort priority categories did not
order correctly when it came to closed/archived
Many blog posts use these to illustrate and images were previously omitted
Additionally strip superfluous HTML and BODY tags from embed HTML.
This was incorrectly returned from server.
This commit adds support for the following ordering filters:
1. `order:activity` which orders the topics by `Topic#bumped_at` in descending order
2. `order:activity-asc` which orders the topics by `Topic#bumped_at` in ascending order
3. `order:latest-post` which orders the topics by `Topic#last_posted_at` in descending order
4. `order:latest-post-asc` which orders the topics by `Topic#last_posted_at` in ascending order
5. `order:created` which orders the topics by `Topic#created_at` in descending order
6. `order:created-asc` which orders the topics by `Topic#created_at` in ascending order
7. `order:views` which orders the topics by `Topic#views` in descending order
8. `order:views-asc` which orders the topics by `Topic#views` in ascending order
9. `order:likes` which orders the topics by `Topic#likes` in descending order
10. `order:likes-asc` which orders the topics by `Topic#likes` in ascending order
11. `order:likes-op` which orders the topics by `Post#like_count` of the first post in the topic in descending order
12. `order:likes-op-asc` which orders the topics by `Post#like_count` of the first post in the topic in ascending order
13. `order:posters` which orders the topics by `Topic#participant_count` in descending order
14. `order:posters-asc` which orders the topics by `Topic#participant_count` in ascending order
15. `order:category` which orders the topics by `Category#name` of the topic's category in descending order
16. `order:category-asc` which orders the topics by `Category#name` of the topic's category in ascending order
Multiple order filters can be composed together and the order of ordering is applied based on the position of the filter
in the query string. For example, `order:views order:created` will order the topics by `Topic#views` in descending order
and then order the topics by `Topics#created_at` in descending order.
This commit adds support for the following date filters:
1. `activity-before:<YYYY-MM-DD>` which filters for topics that have been bumped at or before given date
2. `activity-after:<YYYY-MM-DD>` which filters for topics that have been bumped at or after given date
3. `created-before:<YYYY-MM-DD>` which filters for topics that have been created at or before given date
4. `created-after:<YYYY-MM-DD>` which filters for topics that have been created at or after given date
5. `latest-post-before:<YYYY-MM-DD>` which filters for topics with the
latest post posted at or before given date
6. `latest-post-after:<YYYY-MM-DD>` which filters for topics with the
latest post posted at or after given date
If the filter has an invalid value, i.e string that cannot be converted
into a proper date in the `YYYY-MM-DD` format, the filter will be ignored.
If either of each filter is specify multiple times, only the last
occurrence of each filter will be taken into consideration.
Followup to c03f83bbea.
The `flair_group_id` parameter is now required to show the flair, and this serializer was missing that detail.
This also fixes a typo in the `include_flair_group_name?` method.
Group user event webhooks filtered by group fail silently
because the `group_ids` job arg wasn't being passed into the job.
This change add's `group_ids` to the `EmitWebHookEvent` jobs queued for
`user_added_to_group` and `user_removed_from_group` events.
Large or broken images are removed from oneboxes, but sometimes images
were removed when they were oneboxed too. The reason is that images can
be oneboxed by the AllowlistedGenericOnebox or ImageOnebox and only
AllowlistedGenericOnebox was handled correctly.
We call the `/u/search/users` URL when autocompleting users. It returns
user's name, username and avatar template, but not user ID.
We need it to return user IDs in order to display user status in certain situations.
I could add ID to FoundUserWithStatusSerializer, so it will be added only if
user status is enabled in site settings. But I feel that it's good to always return it,
it's not a lot of data comparing to what we already return, and it should be useful
in other scenarios.
This pull request is a full overhaul of the chat-composer and contains various improvements to the thread panel. They have been grouped in the same PR as lots of improvements/fixes to the thread panel needed an improved composer. This is meant as a first step.
### New features included in this PR
- A resizable side panel
- A clear dropzone area for uploads
- A simplified design for image uploads, this is only a first step towards more redesign of this area in the future
### Notable fixes in this PR
- Correct placeholder in thread panel
- Allows to edit the last message of a thread with arrow up
- Correctly focus composer when replying to a message
- The reply indicator is added instantly in the channel when starting a thread
- Prevents a large variety of bug where the composer could bug and prevent sending message or would clear your input while it has content
### Technical notes
To achieve this PR, three important changes have been made:
- `<ChatComposer>` has been fully rewritten and is now a glimmer component
- The chat composer now takes a `ChatMessage` as input which can directly be used in other operations, it simplifies a lot of logic as we are always working a with a `ChatMessage`
- `TextareaInteractor` has been created to wrap the existing `TextareaTextManipulation` mixin, it will make future migrations easier and allow us to have a less polluted `<ChatComposer>`
Note ".chat-live-pane" has been renamed ".chat-channel"
Design for upload dropzone is from @chapoi
Currently, only user badge grants emit webhook events. This change
extends the `user_badge` webhook to emit user badge revocation events.
A new `user_badge_revoked` event has been introduced instead of relying
on the existing `user_badge_removed` event. `user_badge_removed` emitted
just the `badge_id` and `user_id` which aren't helpful for generating a
meaningful webhook payload for revoked(deleted) user badges.
The new event emits the user badge object.
On the client-side, message-bus subscriptions and reviewable count UI is based on the 'redesigned_user_menu_enabled' boolean. We need to use the same logic on the server-side to ensure things work correctly when legacy navigation is used alongside the new user menu.
The value field of ThemeField is only used when viewing a diff in the staff action logs and local theme editing. value is being serialized into the theme index as well, which is not used. It's a huge amount of JSON that we can cut by removing it.
This also breaks up the various theme serializers into separate classes so they autoload properly (or at least restart the server on edit)
When revising a post, if the topic that post belonged to did not have a category attached it would error with
> NoMethodError (undefined method `read_restricted' for nil:NilClass)
- Move the old '`define_include_method`' arg to a `respect_plugin_enabled` kwarg
- Introduce an `include_condition` kwarg which can be passed a lambda with inclusion logic. Lambda will be run via `instance_exec` in the context of the serializer instance
This is backwards compatible - old-style invocations will trigger a deprecation message
