Why is this change required?
Previously, the tests in `viewing_sidebar_as_anonymous_user_spec.rb` was
flaky because the ordering of the tags changes depending on what the
auto generated tag names are. If a tag name is generated with the name
`tag10`, it would then be sorted before `tag9` which messes up the
ordering specified in our tests. This commit fixes the problem by
specifying the tag names instead of relying on the auto generated ones
by fabricator.
This commit adds data attributes to identify the controls in the user settings UI.
Plugins and TCs can use this information to target each setting to highlight or hide
them.
Although most of the settings also have specific classes identifying them, using data
attributes is more future proof as it is less likely to change them classes, specially
as we increase the adoption of the BEM methodology in CSS.
Using data attributes also are semantically correct as the setting name is data not really related to the classes used.
The user card is always present in the DOM. Therefore we only need to
add the `aria-labelledby` attribute when there is a user (and a title)
to point to.
What does this change do?
This change adds a dropdown filter that allows a user to filter by
selected or unselected categories/tags in the edit navigation menu
modal.
For the categories modal, parent categories that do not match the
dropdown filter will be displayed as disabled since those parent
categories need to be displayed to maintain the hieracy of the child
child categories.
Why this change?
Predicate matchers are poor at providing good error messages when it
fails if all the predicate matcher does is to return a boolean. Prior to
this change, we were using `has_css? && all?` to assert for the tag
section links. There are two problems here. Firstly, when one of the matchers
fail, the error message does not provide any indication of which matcher
failed making it hard to debug failures. Secondly, the matchers were not
able to assert for the ordering of the tag section links which is an
important behaviour to assert for.
This commit changes `PageObjects::Components::Sidebar#has_tag_section_links?`
such that we make use of assertions to ensure ordering. The usage of
`all` will also provide a clear error message when things go wrong.
Why this change?
There was alot of duplication between the edit navigation menu tags/categories modal which
was making it hard to introduce new changes as the work had to be
duplicated into multiple places.
This commit mainly extracts the duplicated code into common components
such that it is easier to make styling changes across both modals.
This PR splits up the preference that controls the count vs dot and destination of sidebar links, which is really hard to understand, into 2 simpler checkboxes:
The new preferences/checkboxes are off by default, but there are database migrations to switch the old preference to the new ones so that existing users don't have to update their preferences to keep their preferred behavior of sidebar links when this changed is rolled out.
Internal topic: t/103529.
Introduces a new above-latest-topic-list-item-post-count outlet, providing a clean way to add other useful elements to the topic-stats section of the latest-topic-list-item template.
What this change?
When a user opens the modal to edit tags or categories for the
navigation menu, we want to input filter to have focus. This commit
fixes that by doing the following:
1. Changes <DModal> component such that it prioritises elements with the
autofocus attribute first.
2. Adds `autofocus` to the input elements on the edit tags/categories
modal form.
This commit removes these these routes that do not have a corresponding
controller action:
```
admin/groups#show
admin/groups#show
post_actions#users
post_actions#defer_flags
list#categories_feed
```
Don't cache user_fields on users separately from custom_fields, since they can get out of sync.
---------
Co-authored-by: Daniel Waterworth <me@danielwaterworth.com>
Under exceptional cases people may need to resize the notification table.
This only happens on forums with a total of more than 2.5 billion notifications.
This rake task can be used to convert all the notification columns to
bigint to make more room.
To export chat messages, go to `/admin/plugins/chat` and click the Create export
button in the _Export chat messages_ section. You'll receive a direct message
when the export is finished.
Currently, this exports all messages from the last 6 months, but not more than
10000 messages.
This exports all chat messages, including messages from private channels and
users' direct conversations. This also exports messages that were deleted.
This should prevent the message to show as active on mobile when making a touch to start scrolling.
This commit also makes naming of touch lifecycle functions coherent.
When a site does not have `default_navigation_menu_tags`
site setting set, anonymous users should be shown the site's top tags as
a default in the tags section. However, this regressed in 9fad71809c
and we ended up showing anonymous users a tags section with only the
`All Tags` section link.
As part of this commit, I have also refactored the QUnit acceptance
tests to system tests which are much easier to work with.
What does this change do?
This change adds the deselect all and reset to defaults buttons to the
edit navigation menu tags modal. The deselect all button when
clicked deselects all the selected tags in the modal. If the user
saves with no tags selected, the user's tags section in the
navigation menu will be set to the site's top tags.
The reset to defaults button is only shown when the
`default_navigation_menu_tags` site setting has been configured.
When clicked, the user's tags section in the navigation menu is
automatically set to the tags defined by the
`default_navigation_menu_tags` site setting.
What does this change do?
This change adds a loading spinner to the edit navigation menu tags
modal when the request to fetch all the tags for a site is in progress.
This mainly to improve the user experience such that we indicate that
something is being loaded instead of just displaying a large empty
space.
What are there no tests for this change?
This change is kind of hard to test and since it is mostly a UX change,
we can live with such regressions in the future. It is still bad to
regress UX wise but impact of such a regression is likely to be low.
There is a problem that unread and new count is not updated to reflecting topicTrackingState.
It is because discourseComputed on Category is not working properly with topicTrackingState. Moving it to component level is making counter reliable.
What does this change do?
This commit adds an input filter to filter through the tag checkboxes in the
modal to edit tags that are shown in the user's navigation menu. The
filtering is a simple matching of the given filter term against the
names of the tags.
What does this change do?
This change is a first pass for adding a modal used to edit tags that appears in
the navigation menu. As the feature is being worked on in phases, it is
currently hidden behind the `new_edit_sidebar_categories_tags_interface_groups` site setting.
The following features will be worked on in future commits:
1. Input filter to filter through the tgas
2. Button to reset tag selection to default navigation menu tags site
settings
3. Button to deselect all current selection
Why this change?
The comment consists of an output that was copied from RSpec's default
output. This has the potential to mess with systems that are parsing
RSpec's output to fetch the spec failures as those systems are usually
looking for the first occurence of `Failures:`
When searching in the context of a topic the <kbd>in all topics</kbd> link would not search globally for the given term and instead it would always search within the current topic. This PR fixes the link to properly update the search context and search globally for the given term.
This fix reveals some _secretly_ broken tests. Update these as well.
We had a bug in this code recently, sometimes users saw weird notifications
like:
User mentioned all_mentioned_user_ids in the help chat channel
We fixed that bug in b85d057.
This refactoring is a follow-up to that fix. As that bug showed, it’s quite easy
to introduce a key that may end up being sent to the `NotifyMentioned` job,
which can lead to such weird notifications. This refactoring makes sure that
the `to_notify` hash contains only IDs of users that should be notified about
mentions.
