Active Record's `to_sql` method seems to return an empty string instead
of the expected SQL query when called on a query involving an
unpersisted model instance.
This replaces the admin `user` used in the specs with a persisted instance.
The `白名单` term becomes `名单 白名单` after it is processed by
cppjieba in :query mode. However, `白名单` is not tokenized as such by cppjieba when it
appears in a string of text. Therefore, this may lead to failed matches as
the search data generated while indexing may not contain all of the
terms generated by :query mode. We've decided to maintain parity for now
such that both indexing and querying uses the same :mix mode. This may
lead to less accurate search but our plan is to properly support CJK
search in the future.
Over the years we accrued many spelling mistakes in the code base.
This PR attempts to fix spelling mistakes and typos in all areas of the code that are extremely safe to change
- comments
- test descriptions
- other low risk areas
Previously we used the raw data indexed to generate blurbs even for cases
when Chinese/Korean/Japanese text was used.
This caused superfluous spaces to show up in excerpts.
Lots of changes but it's mostly a refactoring.
The interesting part that was fix are the 'load_problem_<model>_ids' methods.
They will now return records with no search data associated so they can be properly indexed for the search.
This "bad" state usually happens after a migration.
You can now use `@me` to search for posts created by yourself, this is particularly handy if you have a long username.
`@me rainbow` will find all posts you created with the word rainbow.
Also cleans up test suite so it has no warnings.
In c6ceda8c, a bug was introduced where an admin searching for his own
private messages will actually end up searching through all private
messages on the site.
Follow-up to c6ceda8c4e
With the addition of `PostSearchData#private_message`, a partial
index consisting of only search data from regular posts can be created.
The partial index helps to speed up searches on large sites since PG
will not have to do an index scan on the entire search data index which
has shown to be a bottle neck.
The filter noops if an incorrect username is passed. This filter is not
exposed as part of the UI but is only used when an admin transitions
from a search within a user's personal messages to the full page search.
Follow-up to 4b30799054.
Renamed from `private_messages` to `personal_messages` without
deprecation because the `private_messages` advanced search filter never
worked in the first place when it was implemented.
Similar to `advanced_filter` I introduced `advanced_order`.
I needed a new option because default orders are evaluated after advanced_filter so I couldn't use it.
Also, that part is a little bit more generic
```
elsif word =~ /order:\w+/
@order = word.gsub('order:', '').to_sym
nil
```
After those changes, I can use them in plugins in this way:
```
Search.advanced_order(:votes) do |posts|
posts.reorder("COALESCE((SELECT dvvc.counter FROM discourse_voting_vote_counters dvvc WHERE dvvc.topic_id = subquery.topic_id), 0) DESC")
end
```
Considering document length in search introduced too much variance in
our search results such that it makes certain searches better but at the
same time made certain searches worst. Instead, we want to have a more
determistic way of ranking search so that it is easier to reason about
why a post is rank higher in search than another.
The long term plan to tackle repeated terms is to restrict the number of
positions for a given lexeme in our search index.
Follow up to d8c796bc4.
Note that his change increases query time by around 40% in the following
benchmark against `dev.discourse.org` but this is a tradeoff that has to be taken so that relevance
search is accurate.
```
require 'benchmark/ips'
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.config(time: 10, warmup: 2)
x.report("current aggregate search query") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT topics.id, min(posts.post_number) post_number FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted)) GROUP BY topics.id ORDER BY MAX((
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
) DESC, topics.bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.report("current aggregate search query with proper ranking") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT subquery.topic_id id, (ARRAY_AGG(subquery.post_number ORDER BY rank DESC, bumped_at DESC))[1] post_number, MAX(subquery.rank) rank, MAX(subquery.bumped_at) bumped_at FROM (SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id", (
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
rank, topics.bumped_at bumped_at FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted))) subquery GROUP BY subquery.topic_id ORDER BY rank DESC, bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.compare!
end
```
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
1.000 i/100ms
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
1.000 i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
18.040 (± 0.0%) i/s - 181.000 in 10.035241s
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
12.992 (± 0.0%) i/s - 130.000 in 10.007214s
Comparison:
current aggregate search query: 18.0 i/s
current aggregate search query with proper ranking: 13.0 i/s - 1.39x (± 0.00) slower
```
```
discourse_development=# SELECT alias, lexemes FROM TS_DEBUG('www.discourse.org');
alias | lexemes
-------+---------------------
host | {www.discourse.org}
discourse_development=# SELECT TO_TSVECTOR('www.discourse.org');
to_tsvector
-----------------------
'www.discourse.org':1
```
Given the above lexeme, we will inject additional lexeme by splitting
the host on `.`. The actual tsvector stored will look something like
```
tsvector
---------------------------------------
'discourse':1 'discourse.org':1 'org':1 'www':1 'www.discourse.org':1
```
Previously, we would only take either the `MIN` or `MAX` for
`post_number` during aggregation meaning that the ranking is not
considered.
```
require 'benchmark/ips'
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.config(time: 10, warmup: 2)
x.report("current aggregate search query") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT topics.id, min(posts.post_number) post_number FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted)) GROUP BY topics.id ORDER BY MAX((
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
) DESC, topics.bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.report("current aggregate search query with proper ranking") do
DB.exec <<~SQL
SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id" FROM "posts" JOIN (SELECT *, row_number() over() row_number FROM (SELECT subquery.topic_id id, (ARRAY_AGG(subquery.post_number))[1] post_number, MAX(subquery.rank) rank, MAX(subquery.bumped_at) bumped_at FROM (SELECT "posts"."id", "posts"."user_id", "posts"."topic_id", "posts"."post_number", "posts"."raw", "posts"."cooked", "posts"."created_at", "posts"."updated_at", "posts"."reply_to_post_number", "posts"."reply_count", "posts"."quote_count", "posts"."deleted_at", "posts"."off_topic_count", "posts"."like_count", "posts"."incoming_link_count", "posts"."bookmark_count", "posts"."score", "posts"."reads", "posts"."post_type", "posts"."sort_order", "posts"."last_editor_id", "posts"."hidden", "posts"."hidden_reason_id", "posts"."notify_moderators_count", "posts"."spam_count", "posts"."illegal_count", "posts"."inappropriate_count", "posts"."last_version_at", "posts"."user_deleted", "posts"."reply_to_user_id", "posts"."percent_rank", "posts"."notify_user_count", "posts"."like_score", "posts"."deleted_by_id", "posts"."edit_reason", "posts"."word_count", "posts"."version", "posts"."cook_method", "posts"."wiki", "posts"."baked_at", "posts"."baked_version", "posts"."hidden_at", "posts"."self_edits", "posts"."reply_quoted", "posts"."via_email", "posts"."raw_email", "posts"."public_version", "posts"."action_code", "posts"."locked_by_id", "posts"."image_upload_id", (
TS_RANK_CD(
post_search_data.search_data,
TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD'),
1|32
) *
(
CASE categories.search_priority
WHEN 2
THEN 0.6
WHEN 3
THEN 0.8
WHEN 4
THEN 1.2
WHEN 5
THEN 1.4
ELSE
CASE WHEN topics.closed
THEN 0.9
ELSE 1
END
END
)
)
rank, topics.bumped_at bumped_at FROM "posts" INNER JOIN "post_search_data" ON "post_search_data"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "topics" ON "topics"."id" = "posts"."topic_id" AND ("topics"."deleted_at" IS NULL) LEFT JOIN categories ON categories.id = topics.category_id WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) AND "posts"."post_type" IN (1, 2, 3, 4) AND (topics.visible) AND (topics.archetype <> 'private_message') AND (post_search_data.search_data @@ TO_TSQUERY('english', '''postgres'':*ABCD')) AND (categories.id NOT IN (
SELECT categories.id WHERE categories.search_priority = 1
)
) AND ((categories.id IS NULL) OR (NOT categories.read_restricted))) subquery GROUP BY subquery.topic_id ORDER BY rank DESC, bumped_at DESC LIMIT 51 OFFSET 0) xxx) x ON x.id = posts.topic_id AND x.post_number = posts.post_number WHERE ("posts"."deleted_at" IS NULL) ORDER BY row_number;
SQL
end
x.compare!
end
```
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
1.000 i/100ms
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
1.000 i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
current aggregate search query
17.726 (± 0.0%) i/s - 178.000 in 10.045107s
current aggregate search query with proper ranking
17.802 (± 0.0%) i/s - 178.000 in 10.002230s
Comparison:
current aggregate search query with proper ranking: 17.8 i/s
current aggregate search query: 17.7 i/s - 1.00x (± 0.00) slower
```
This reverts commit 20780a1eee.
* SECURITY: re-adds accidentally reverted commit:
03d26cd6: ensure embed_url contains valid http(s) uri
* when the merge commit e62a85cf was reverted, git chose the 2660c2e2 parent to land on
instead of the 03d26cd6 parent (which contains security fixes)
Adds a new topic_excerpt_maxlength site setting.
* When topic excerpt is requested for a post, use the new topic_excerpt_maxlength site setting to limit the size of the excerpt
* Remove code for getting/setting Post.excerpt_size as it is not used anywhere
