* show likes value in crawler view if count is > 0
* remove <hr> since horizontal line is already provided by css - this removes one of 2 horizontal lines in post crawler view
* Fix handling SNS notifications for AWS SES
This fixes detection of email bounce by:
- removing hard requirement for email ID, ID in webhook msg never equals this in email_log
- gets bounce_score from user stats instead of nonexistent field in webhook msg
* Remove empty line
* Prettify access to EmailLog for parsing SNS notification
Co-Authored-By: SystemZ <SystemZ@users.noreply.github.com>
This test of `prevent_anons_from_downloading_files` was testing an image instead of an attachment and it was testing the wrong upload URL. I fixed the test, but with `config.public_file_server.enabled = true` on the test environment, this will always fail, as preventing anonymous file downloads depends on nginx. So, I marked the test as skipped, for now.
* DEV: Replace site_setting_saved DiscourseEvent with site_setting_changed
site_setting_saved is confusing for a few reasons:
- It is attached to the after_save of the ActiveRecord model. This is confusing because it only works 'properly' with the db_provider
- It passes the activerecord model as a parameter, which is confusing because you get access to the 'database' version of the setting, rather than the ruby setting. For example, booleans appear as 'y' or 'n' strings.
- When the event is called, the local process cache has not yet been updated. So if you call SiteSetting.setting_name inside the event handler, you will receive the old site setting value
I have deprecated that event, and added a new site_setting_changed event. It passes three parameters:
- Setting name (symbol)
- Old value (in ruby format)
- New value (in ruby format)
It is triggered after the setting has been persisted, and the local process cache has been updated.
This commit also includes a test case which describes the confusing behavior. This can be removed once site_setting_saved is removed.
This is a first step of a performance optimisation, more will follow
Previously we did not properly account for previously read topics while
"rushing" marking times on posts.
The new mechanism now avoids "rushing" sending timings to server if all
the posts were read.
Also to alleviate some server load we only "ping" the server with old timings
once a minute (it used to be every 20 seconds)
