When a post containing an apostrophe (') is being cooked, the apostrophe is being converted to the "typographic" version (’) (because we enable markdown-it's **typographer** mode by default in Discourse)
When you select text that contains such apostrophe and then try to save your fast edit, it fails miserably without any error.
That's because when you select text from the DOM, it uses the cooked version which has the typographic apostrophe.
When you save your fast edit, we fetch the raw version of the post, which has the "regular" apostrophe. Thus doing `raw.replace(selectedText, editedText)` doesn't work because `raw` has the regular apostrophe but `selectedText` has the typographic apostrophe.
Since it's somewhat complicated to handle all typographic characters, we would basically have to reverse the process done in `custom-typographer-replacements.js`, we instead bail out and show the composer when we detect such character in the selection.
Internal ref - t/143836
This reverts commit 766ff723f8.
Ensure that we create the sidekiq log file first before opening it for
logging. This avoids any issue of the log file not being present when we
initialize an instance of the `Logger`.
Some pages like new/edit item should not display admin header. New attribute called `@shouldDisplay` was added.
As a proof of concept, the flags page was updated.
In 806e37aaec, I improved the conflict handling when editing a post to account for title and tags.
This fixes an edge cases when a topic has a hidden tag the current editor can't see. When they submit their edit, we automatically add the hidden tags before checking with the tags stored in the database.
Reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/341375
We've seen in some communities abuse of user profile where bios and other fields are used in malicious ways, such as malware distribution. A common pattern between all the abuse cases we've seen is that the malicious actors tend to have 0 posts and have a low trust level.
To eliminate this abuse vector, or at least make it much less effective, we're making the following changes to user profiles:
1. Anonymous, TL0 and TL1 users cannot see any user profiles for users with 0 posts except for staff users
2. Anonymous and TL0 users can only see profiles of TL1 users and above
Users can always see their own profile, and they can still hide their profiles via the "Hide my public profile" preference. Staff can always see any user's profile.
Internal topic: t/142853.
Currently when copy an OP to another topic, the link is to the topic that wasn't moved. The notification should instead be to the new topic the OP was moved to -- we have duplicate logic already for this but first post creation get special treatment, and this applies the same treatment.
Follow-up from this commit - 9b8af0ea9f
Adds helpful data into MovedPost records for later lookup. ALSO fixes notifications for freeze_original to point to the newly created post, not the moved post.
PostMover has a new option called freeze_original implemented in this commit. It was previously unexposed in the controller. This PR permits the param in the controller, and passes it into PostMover.
Also, this applies a value transformer for move/merge payload options. In addition a plugin outlet in the move post modal. This allows plugins to add content to the modal, which can modify the payload (and use the freeze_original argument for example)
Followup c7e471d35a
It is currently possible to add a bundle (which is a collection
of actions used for a dropdown on the client) for a reviewable
via actions.add_bundle and then never add any actions to it.
This causes the client to explode, as seen in the referenced
commit, because of the way our store expects to resolve objects
referenced by ID that are passed down by the serializer, which
then causes Ember to have an unrecoverable render error.
Fixing this on the serializer level is not really possible because
of all the ActiveModel::Serializer magic that serializes
objects by ID reference when doing things like has_many.
`Reviewable#actions_for` is a better place to do this anyway,
because this is the main location where the bundles and actions
are built for every action via the serializer.
Followup aca6c462a6
Remove the warning message if DISCOURSE_INCLUDE_GEMS_IN_RSPEC_BACKTRACE
is not set for now while we decide whether we want to include
this or not, it's a little in-your-face.
Currently only system flags are translated. When we send message to the user that their post was deleted because of custom flag, we should default to custom flag name.
Previously when attempting to edit a globally shadowed setting, the
error message was not very helpful, it said "You are not allowed to
change hidden settings". This commit changes the error message to
reflect the actual problem, which is that the setting is shadowed by
a global setting via ENV var.
Followup:
* https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/28160
* https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/25921
In the previous PRs we added 2 environent variables
to control backtrace output for errors in rspec,
`RSPEC_EXCLUDE_NOISE_IN_BACKTRACE`, and
`RSPEC_EXCLUDE_GEMS_IN_BACKTRACE`
These largely do the same thing, and we want to enable
that behaviour by default.
This commit consolidates them into one env var,
`DISCOURSE_INCLUDE_GEMS_IN_RSPEC_BACKTRACE`, which is
disabled by default, meaning gem backtraces will not
be shown in rspec backtraces by default.
Also for the request spec use case with `RspecErrorTracker`,
we now show an indicator of how many lines were hidden from
the backtrace e.g. "...(21 framework line(s) excluded)",
and for this and the normal rspec backtrace exclusion we
show a warning if `DISCOURSE_INCLUDE_GEMS_IN_RSPEC_BACKTRACE`
is not enabled.
before this commit, when moving posts with freeze option, the rate limit was being applied leading to errors. This commit fixes that.
and also adds tests for the scenarios of moving posts with freeze option.
BEFORE: if you click the "reply" button on a post and then decided that you want to "edit" the same post, clicking the "edit" button would do nothing. Clicking "edit" on another post works, but editing the same post would appear broken.
AFTER: if you click the "edit" button, it will properly load the content of the post you're trying to edit. No matter which one it is.
This was somewhat tricky to track down as the system specs seemed to contradict the qunit tests until I realized that the qunit tests were only testing the edit on the 1st post and the system specs were testing on replies.
I improved the qunit tests to test both editing OP and a reply and (hopefully) made the system specs a little bit clearer.
This is a follow up to bbe62d88d2.
In order to limit issues with duplicate inline CSS definitions, this will now deduplicate inline CSS styles with the "last-to-be-defined-wins" strategy.
Also removes unecessary whitespaces in inline styles.
Context - https://meta.discourse.org/t/resolve-final-styles-in-email-notifications/310219
Co-authored-by: Thomas Kalka <thomas.kalka@gmail.com>
The hierarchical search for categories is composed of several complex
nested queries. This change ensures that the secured categories are
filtered out as soon as possible to ensure that the default limit of 5
categories is reached.
Without this fix, the search can return less than 5 categories if any
of the first 5 categories cannot be displayed due to permissions.
Non-admin/moderator users can bulk select items in new/unread, but not in
latest/top/hot. This commit ensures that when the user can no longer
bulk select items in a list, the bulk select checkboxes in the topic list
rows are hidden.
Spec was flaky cause work could still be in pipeline after the defer
length is 0. Our length denotes the backlog, not the in progress
count.
This adds a mechanism for gracefully stopping the queue and avoids
wait_for callse
We already add the "delete user" and "delete and block user" options to the drop-down for potential spam, but we should do this for potentially illegal posts as well.
This is entirely based on the implementation for the potential spam one, including caching the status on the reviewable record.
Also note that just as for potential spam, the user must be "deletable" for the option to appear.
I also took the liberty to move the options in the drop-down to what I think is a more intuitive place. (Between delete post and suspend/silence user.)
