Why this change?
Predicate matchers are poor at providing good error messages when it
fails if all the predicate matcher does is to return a boolean. Prior to
this change, we were using `has_css? && all?` to assert for the tag
section links. There are two problems here. Firstly, when one of the matchers
fail, the error message does not provide any indication of which matcher
failed making it hard to debug failures. Secondly, the matchers were not
able to assert for the ordering of the tag section links which is an
important behaviour to assert for.
This commit changes `PageObjects::Components::Sidebar#has_tag_section_links?`
such that we make use of assertions to ensure ordering. The usage of
`all` will also provide a clear error message when things go wrong.
When a site does not have `default_navigation_menu_tags`
site setting set, anonymous users should be shown the site's top tags as
a default in the tags section. However, this regressed in 9fad71809c
and we ended up showing anonymous users a tags section with only the
`All Tags` section link.
As part of this commit, I have also refactored the QUnit acceptance
tests to system tests which are much easier to work with.
What does this change do?
This change is a first pass for adding a modal used to edit tags that appears in
the navigation menu. As the feature is being worked on in phases, it is
currently hidden behind the `new_edit_sidebar_categories_tags_interface_groups` site setting.
The following features will be worked on in future commits:
1. Input filter to filter through the tgas
2. Button to reset tag selection to default navigation menu tags site
settings
3. Button to deselect all current selection
Today I learnt that `has_link?("text of link")` by default does an
includes instead of looking for a link with the exact text. This is not
the behaviour I want so I'm changing
`PageObjects::Components::Sidebar.has_section_link?` to use the
`exact_text` option instead.
What this change?
We are currently not fully satisfied with the current way to edit the
categories and tags that appears in the sidebar where the user is
redirected to the tracking preferences tab in the user's profile causing
the user to lose context of the current page. In addition, the dropdown
to select categories or tags limits the amount of information we can
display.
Since editing or adding a custom categories section is already using a
modal, we have decided to switch editing the categories and tags that
appear in the sidebar to use a modal as well.
This commit ships a first pass of the edit categories modal such that we
can keep the commit small and reviewable. The incomplete nature of the
feature is also reflected in the fact that the feature is hidden behind
a new `new_edit_sidebar_categories_tags_interface_groups` site setting.
Allow admins to edit Community section. This includes drag and drop reorder, change names, delete and reset to default.
Visual improvements introduced in edit community section modal are available in edit custom section form as well. For example:
- drag and drop links to change their position;
- smaller icon picker.
What is the problem?
We are relying on RSpec custom matchers in system tests by defining
predicates in page objects. The problem is that this can result in a
system test unnecessarily waiting up till the full duration of
Capybara's default wait time when the RSpec custom matcher is used with
`not_to`. Considering this topic page object where we have a `has_post?`
predicate defined.
```
class Topic < PageObject
def has_post?
has_css?('something')
end
end
```
The assertion `expect(Topic.new).not_to have_post` will end up waiting
the full Capybara's default wait time since the RSpec custom matcher is
calling Capybara's `has_css?` method which will wait until the selector
appear. If the selector has already disappeared by the time the
assertion is called, we end up waiting for something that will never
exists.
This commit fixes such cases by introducing new predicates that uses
the `has_no_*` versions of Capybara's node matchers.
For future reference, `to have_css` and `not_to have_css` is safe to sue
because the RSpec matcher defined by Capbyara is smart enough to call
`has_css?` or `has_no_css?` based on the expectation of the assertion.
Previously, public custom sections were only visible to logged-in users. In this PR, we are making them visible to anonymous as well.
The reason is that Community Section will be moved into custom section model to be easily editable by admins.
Allows users to configure their own custom sidebar sections with links withing Discourse instance. Links can be passed as relative path, for example "/tags" or full URL.
Only path is saved in DB, so when Discourse domain is changed, links will be still valid.
Feature is hidden behind SiteSetting.enable_custom_sidebar_sections. This hidden setting determines the group which members have access to this new feature.
