Further on from my earlier PR #8973 also reject upload as secure if its origin URL contains images/emoji. We still check Emoji.all first to try and be canonical.
This may be a little heavy handed (e.g. if an external URL followed this same path it would be a false positive), but there are a lot of emoji aliases where the actual Emoji url is something, but you can have another image that should not be secure that that thing is an alias for. For example slight_smile.png does not show up in Emoji.all BUT slightly_smiling_face does, and it aliases slight_smile e.g. /images/emoji/twitter/slight_smile.png?v=9 and /images/emoji/twitter/slightly_smiling_face.png?v=9 are equivalent.
The rake task was broken, because the addition of the
UploadSecurity check returned true/false instead of the
upload ID to determine which uploads to set secure.
Also it was rebaking the posts in the wrong place and
pretty inefficiently at that. Also it was rebaking before
the upload was being changed to secure in the DB.
This also updates the task to set the access_control_post_id
for all uploads. the first post the upload is linked to is used
for the access control. if the upload doesn't get changed to
secure this doesn't affect anything.
Added a spec for the rake task to cover common cases.
Sometimes PullHotlinkedImages pulls down a site emoji and creates a new upload record for it. In the cases where these happen the upload is not created via the normal path that custom emoji follows, so we need to check in UploadSecurity whether the origin of the upload is based on a regular site emoji. If it is we never want to mark it as secure (we don't want emoji not accessible from other posts because of secure media).
This only became apparent because the uploads:ensure_correct_acl rake task uses UploadSecurity to check whether an upload should be secure, which would have marked a whole bunch of regular-old-emojis as secure.
Now if a group is visible but unmentionable, users can search for it
when composing by typing with `@`, but it will be rendered without the
grey background color.
It will also no longer pop up a JIT warning saying "You are about to
mention X people" because the group will not be mentioned.
After adding a tag as a synonym of another tag,
both tags will have the wrong topic counts. It's
corrected within 12 hours by the EnsureDbConsistency
job. This fix ensures the topic counts are updated
much sooner.
Previously we were caching by user_id, but the there are only two possible outcomes. Therefore we only need to cache two values.
This removes another N+1 query when serializing multiple user cards.
This confuses me every time I run qunit tests in the browser. The tab is labelled Meta, but it's not meta! This change has no functional impact on the tests
* FIX: when unread reply notification exists don't create new
From time to time, the user is creating a reply post and then they want to add additional details. They edit an existing post and for example, add a quote from a previous one.
In that situation, if the user to whom reply was directed to already have the unread notification, we should not create the new one.
That behaviour was mentioned here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-then-edit-to-add-quote-notification-redundancy/138358
* FIX: dont create new notification if already exists
* Because custom emoji count as post "uploads" we were
marking them as secure when updating the secure status for post uploads.
* We were also giving them an access control post id, which meant
broken image previews from 403 errors in the admin custom emoji list.
* We now check if an upload is used as a custom emoji and do not
assign the access control post + never mark as secure.
