On the topic view route we query for reviewables of each post in the stream,
using a query that filters on two unindexed columns. This results in a Parallel Seq Scan
over all rows, which can take quite some time (~20ms was seen) on forums with lots of flags
After index is added PostgreSQL planner opts for a simple Index Scan and runs in sub 1ms.
Before:
```
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finalize GroupAggregate (cost=11401.08..11404.87 rows=20 width=28) (actual time=19.209..19.209 rows=1 loops=1)
Group Key: r.target_id
-> Gather Merge (cost=11401.08..11404.41 rows=26 width=28) (actual time=19.202..20.419 rows=1 loops=1)
Workers Planned: 2
Workers Launched: 2
-> Partial GroupAggregate (cost=10401.06..10401.38 rows=13 width=28) (actual time=16.958..16.958 rows=0 loops=3)
Group Key: r.target_id
-> Sort (cost=10401.06..10401.09 rows=13 width=16) (actual time=16.956..16.956 rows=0 loops=3)
Sort Key: r.target_id
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
Worker 0: Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
Worker 1: Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.42..10400.82 rows=13 width=16) (actual time=15.894..16.938 rows=0 loops=3)
-> Parallel Seq Scan on reviewables r (cost=0.00..10302.47 rows=8 width=12) (actual time=15.882..16.927 rows=0 loops=3)
Filter: (((target_type)::text = 'Post'::text) AND (target_id = ANY ('{7565483,7565563,7565566,7565567,7565568,7565569,7565579,7565580,7565583,7565586,7565588,7565589,7565601,7565602,7565603,7565613,7565620,7565623,7565624,7565626}'::integer[])))
Rows Removed by Filter: 49183
-> Index Scan using index_reviewable_scores_on_reviewable_id on reviewable_scores s (cost=0.42..12.27 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.029..0.030 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (reviewable_id = r.id)
Planning Time: 0.318 ms
Execution Time: 20.470 ms
```
After:
```
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=0.84..342.54 rows=20 width=28) (actual time=0.038..0.038 rows=1 loops=1)
Group Key: r.target_id
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.84..341.95 rows=31 width=16) (actual time=0.020..0.033 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using index_reviewables_on_target_id on reviewables r (cost=0.42..96.07 rows=20 width=12) (actual time=0.013..0.026 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (target_id = ANY ('{7565483,7565563,7565566,7565567,7565568,7565569,7565579,7565580,7565583,7565586,7565588,7565589,7565601,7565602,7565603,7565613,7565620,7565623,7565624,7565626}'::integer[]))
-> Index Scan using index_reviewable_scores_on_reviewable_id on reviewable_scores s (cost=0.42..12.27 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (reviewable_id = r.id)
Planning Time: 0.253 ms
Execution Time: 0.067 ms
```
The problem with this index is that on sites with a high non-pm to pm
posts ratio, the index is esstentially duplicating the existing index on
`PostSearchData#search_data`. If the site is huge, the index ends up
taking up more diskspace.
Very large batches can take an enormous amount of time due to churn
Limiting to 200k changes at a time gives us a far larger chance of finishing
the job without timing out or deadlocking.
Enabling the moderators_manage_categories_and_groups site setting will allow moderator users to create/manage groups.
* show New Group form to moderators
* Allow moderators to update groups and read logs, where appropriate
* Rename site setting from create -> manage
* improved tests
* Migration should rename old log entries
* Log group changes, even if those changes mean you can no longer see the group
* Slight reshuffle
* RouteTo /g if they no longer have permissions to view group
A giant transaction in a post migration can be very risky.
This splits the large amount of work this migration needs to do into 2 parts:
1. A re-runnable cleanup job prior to transaction
2. A minimally sized transaction to add the database constraint
This avoids large amounts of churn on the table
Convert all IMAP logging to write to a database table for easier inspection. These logs are cleaned up daily if they are > 5 days old.
Logs can easily be watched in dev by setting DISCOURSE_DEV_LOG_LEVEL=\"debug\" and running tail -f development.log | grep IMAP
When we run the S3 inventory, mark uploads that exist as verified true, those that don't as verified false, and uploads not included in the check / not yet checked as verified nil.
* FEATURE: set notification levels when added to a group
This feature allows admins and group owners to define default
category and tag tracking levels that will be applied to user
preferences automatically at the time when users are added to the
group. Users are free to change those preferences afterwards.
When removed from a group, the user's notification preferences aren't
changed.
Adds a imap_group_id column to IncomingEmail to deal with an issue where we were trying to update emails in the mailbox, calling IncomingEmail.where(imap_sync: true). However UID and UIDVALIDITY could be the same across accounts. So if group A used IMAP details for Gmail account A, and group B used IMAP details for Gmail account B, and both tried to sync changes to an email with UID of 3 (e.g. changing Labels), one account could affect the other. This even applied to Archiving!
Also in this PR:
* Fix error occurring if we do a uid_fetch and no emails are returned
* Allow for creating labels within the target mailbox (previously we would not do this, only use existing labels)
* Improve consistency for log messages
* Add specs for generic IMAP provider (Gmail specs still to come)
* Add custom archiving support for Gmail
* Only use Message-ID for uniqueness of IncomingEmail if it was generated by us
* Various refactors and improvements
For the following conditions, the TopicUser.bookmarked column was not updated correctly:
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the reminder was sent
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the owner of the bookmark replied to the topic
This adds another migration to fix the out-of-sync column and also some refactors to BookmarkManager to allow for more of these delete cases. BookmarkManager is used instead of directly destroying the bookmark in PostCreator and BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler.
Because previous migration was already deployed and some databases were already migrated, I needed to add some conditions to the migration.
Previous migration - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/db/post_migrate/20200629232159_rename_path_whitelist_to_allowed_paths.rb
What will happen in a scenario when previous migration was not run.
1. column allowed_paths will be created
2. allowed_path will be populated with data from path_whitelist
3. path_whitelist column will be dropped
What will happen in a scenario when previous migration was already run.
1. column allowed_paths will not be created because already exists - `unless column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :allowed_paths)`
2. Data will not be copied because path_whitelist is missing - `if column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :path_whitelist) && column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :allowed_paths)`
3. path_whitelist column deletion will be skipped - `if column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :path_whitelist)`
This adds an option to "delete on owner reply" to bookmarks. If you select this option in the modal, then reply to the topic the bookmark is in, the bookmark will be deleted on reply.
This PR also changes the checkboxes for these additional bookmark options to an Integer column in the DB with a combobox to select the option you want.
The use cases are:
* Sometimes I will bookmark the topics to read it later. In this case we definitely don’t need to keep the bookmark after I replied to it.
* Sometimes I will read the topic in mobile and I will prefer to reply in PC later. Or I may have to do some research before reply. So I will bookmark it for reply later.
* FEATURE: Allow List for PMs
This feature adds a new user setting that is disabled by default that
allows them to specify a list of users that are allowed to send them
private messages. This way they don't have to maintain a large list of
users they don't want to here from and instead just list the people they
know they do want. Staff will still always be able to send messages to
the user.
* Update PR based on feedback
* Remove unneeded bookmark name index.
* Change bookmark search query to use post_search_data. This allows searching on topic title and post content
* Tweak the style/layout of the bookmark list so the search looks better and the whole page fits better on mobile.
* Added scopes UI
* Create scopes when creating a new API key
* Show scopes on the API key show route
* Apply scopes on API requests
* Extend scopes from plugins
* Add missing scopes. A mapping can be associated with multiple controller actions
* Only send scopes if the use global key option is disabled. Use the discourse plugin registry to add new scopes
* Add not null validations and index for api_key_id
* Annotate model
* DEV: Move default mappings to ApiKeyScope
* Remove unused attribute and improve UI for existing keys
* Support multiple parameters separated by a comma
Follow up to https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/10188/files
There are still TopicUser records where bookmarked is true even though there are no Bookmark or PostAction records with the type of bookmark for the associated topic and user. This migration corrects this issue by setting bookmarked to false for these cases.
We have a couple of examples of enormous amounts of text being entered in the name column of bookmarks. This is not desirable...it is just meant to be a short note / reminder of why you bookmarked this.
This PR caps the column at 100 characters and truncates existing names in the database to 100 characters.
* This is causing issues where sometimes bookmarked is out of sync with what is in the Bookmark table. The BookmarkManager handles updating this column now.
* Add migration to fix bookmarked column that is incorrectly marked false when a Bookmark record exists.
A future-dated migration was accidently introduced by me in 45c399f0. This was removed in b9762afc, but other migrations had already been generated based on its incorrect date. This commit removes the offending data in the schema_migrations table, and corrects the version in the published_pages migration.
This commit also adds a check to db:migrate which raises an error when invalid migration timestamps are used.
Badge and user_badge tables were created using add_column index: true
When the migration was written, `index: true` was a no-op for non-reference columns
Since then, rails made it work 9a0d35e820
This migration adds the index to very old sites, so that we have a consistent state
This is a no-op for modern installations. It only affects older sites.
Follow-up to f7d676dce1
This needs to be done in a transaction, because we need to drop and recreate the badge_posts view.
