This is causing issues when purging old users, if they are set up in the
exact condition where they will be demoted into another group, but also
do not have a primary email.
* FEATURE: Don't display muted/ignored users under "who liked"
Previously, if you clicked on the heart icon below a post
it would show you the avatar for a user even if you ignored or muted
them.
This commit will instead display a (?) icon. The count of likes will
remain correct, but you needn't be reminded of the person you
preferred not to see.
* Use a circle instead of (?) for unknown user
The `EXECUTE FUNCTION` syntax for `CREATE TRIGGER` statements was introduced in PostgreSQL 11. We need to replace `EXECUTE FUNCTION` with `EXECUTE PROCEDURE` in order to be able to restore backups created with PG12 on PG10.
Fixed bugs, added specs, extracted the upload downsizing code to a class, added support for non-S3 setups, changed it so that images aren't downloaded twice.
This code has been tested on production and successfully resized ~180k uploads.
Includes:
* DEV: Extract upload downsizing logic
* DEV: Add support for non-S3 uploads
* DEV: Process only images uploaded by users
* FIX: Incorrect usage of `count` and `exist?` typo
* DEV: Spec S3 image downsizing
* DEV: Avoid downloading images twice
* DEV: Update filesizes earlier in the process
* DEV: Return false on invalid upload
* FIX: Download images that currently above the limit (If the image size limit is decreased, then there was no way to resize those images that now fall outside the allowed size range)
* Update script/downsize_uploads.rb (Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>)
This came in as a request on meta to include the raw field in the post
webhook serializer.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/49045/55?u=blake
Including this field can prevent needing to make a 2nd API request to
get the raw field of a post.
It would be handy down the road if we updated the webhook ui to specify
fields or arguments that you wanted to be included in the serialized
data, but most requests I've seen to update the serializers have been
valid requests that are good to add anyways, so I don't think we have
reached that point yet.
FIX: prevent re-flagging when we have reviewed flags before
Fixes an edge case where a review can be reflagged when:
User flags as inappropriate.
Moderator rejects the flag.
Another user re-flags the post as spam.
Before, anyone was able to re-flag as inappropriate despite it being flagged
previously. With this, users are unable to re-flag for the same reason
regardless of reviewable status.
