When sending emails out via group SMTP, if we
are sending them to non-staged users we want
to mask those emails with BCC, just so we don't
expose them to anyone we shouldn't. Staged users
are ones that have likely only interacted with
support via email, and will likely include other
people who were CC'd on the original email to the
group.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
Backports the following:
* 40e8912395
* bbcb69461f
Which were showing an error when users were
trying to claim invites multiple times and
a subsequent follow-up fix.
This commit adds some protections in InviteRedeemer to ensure that email
can never be nil, which could cause issues with inviting the invited
person to private topics since there was an incorrect inner join.
If the email is nil and the invite is scoped to an email, we just use
that invite.email unconditionally. If a redeeming_user (an existing
user) is passed in when redeeming an email, we use their email to
override the passed in email. Otherwise we just use the passed in
email. We now raise an error after all this if the email is still nil.
This commit also adds some tests to catch the private topic fix, and
some general improvements and comments around the invite code.
This commit also includes a migration to delete TopicAllowedUser records
for users who were mistakenly added to topics as part of the invite
redemption process.
Before this commit, we did not have guardian checks in place to determine if a
topic's title associated with a user badge should be displayed or not.
This means that the topic title of topics with restricted access
could be leaked to anon and users without access if certain conditions
are met. While we will not specify the conditions required, we have internally
assessed that the odds of meeting such conditions are low.
With this commit, we will now apply a guardian check to ensure that the
current user is able to see a topic before the topic's title is included
in the serialized object of a `UserBadge`.
Before this commit, there was no way for us to efficiently check an
array of topics for which a user can see. Therefore, this commit
introduces the `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` method which accepts an
array of `Topic#id`s and filters out the ids which the user is not
allowed to see. The `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` method is meant to
maintain feature parity with `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic?` at all
times so a consistency check has been added in our tests to ensure that
`TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` returns the same result as
`TopicGuardian#can_see_topic?`. In the near future, the plan is for us
to switch to `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` completely but I'm not
doing that in this commit as we have to be careful with the performance
impact of such a change.
This method is currently not being used in the current commit but will
be relied on in a subsequent commit.
* SECURITY: moderator shouldn't be able to import a theme via API.
* DEV: apply `AdminConstraint` for all the "themes" routes.
Co-authored-by: Vinoth Kannan <svkn.87@gmail.com>
Adds limits to location and website fields at model and DB level to
match the bio_raw field limits. A limit cannot be added at the DB level
for bio_raw because it is a postgres text field.
The migration here uses version `6.1` instead of `7.0` since `stable`
is not on that version of rails yet, otherwise this is the same as `beta`
apart from also removing the new tests which caused too many conflicts.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan gxtan1990@gmail.com
In certain situations, a logged in user can redeem an invite with an email that
either doesn't match the invite's email or does not adhere to the email domain
restriction of an invite link. The impact of this flaw is aggrevated
when the invite has been configured to add the user that accepts the
invite into restricted groups.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
When a site has `SiteSetting.invite_only` enabled, we create a
`ReviewableUser`record when activating a user if the user is not
approved. Therefore, we need to approve the user when redeeming an
invite.
There are some uncertainties surrounding why a `ReviewableRecord` is
created for a user in an invites only site but this commit does not seek
to address that.
Follow-up to 7c4e2d33fa
`run-qunit.js` does not expect QUnit tests to start automatically but
our wizard QUnit setup did not respect the `qunit_disable_auto_start`
URL param. Hence, tests would start running automatically and when a
subsequent `QUnit.start()` function call is made, we ended up getting a
`QUnit.start cannot be called inside a test context.` error.
This error can be consistently reproduced in the `discourse:discourse_test` container but not in
the local development environment. I do not know why and did not feel
like it is important at this point in time to know why.
This security fix affects sites which have `SiteSetting.must_approve_users`
enabled. There are intentional and unintentional cases where invited
users can be auto approved and are deemed to have skipped the staff approval process.
Instead of trying to reason about when auto-approval should happen, we have decided that
enabling the `must_approve_users` setting going forward will just mean that all new users
must be explicitly approved by a staff user in the review queue. The only case where users are auto
approved is when the `auto_approve_email_domains` site setting is used.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
(Stable backport of 7ed899f)
There is a couple of layers of caching for theme JavaScript in Discourse:
The first layer is the `javascript_caches` table in the database. When a theme
with JavaScript files is installed, Discourse stores each one of the JavaScript
files in the `theme_fields` table, and then concatenates the files, compiles
them, computes a SHA1 digest of the compiled JavaScript and store the results
along with the SHA1 digest in the `javascript_caches` table.
Now when a request comes in, we need to render `<script>` tags for the
activated theme(s) of the site. To do this, we retrieve the `javascript_caches`
records of the activated themes and generate a `<script>` tag for each record.
The `src` attribute of these tags is a path to the `/theme-javascripts/:digest`
route which simply responds with the compiled JavaScript that has the requested
digest.
The second layer is a distributed cache whose purpose is to make rendering
`<script>` a lot more efficient. Without this cache, we'd have to query the
`javascript_caches` table to retrieve the SHA1 digests for every single
request. So we use this cache to store the `<script>` tags themselves so that
we only have to retrieve the `javascript_caches` records of the activated
themes for the first request and future requests simply get the cached
`<script>` tags.
What this commit does it ensures that the SHA1 digest in the
`javascript_caches` table stay the same across compilations by adding an order
by id clause to the query that loads the `theme_fields` records. Currently, we
specify no order when retrieving the `theme_fields` records so the order in
which they're retrieved can change across compilations and therefore cause the
SHA1 to change even though the individual records have not changed at all.
An inconsistent SHA1 digest across compilations can cause the database cache
and the distributed cache to have different digests and that causes the
JavaScript to fail to load (and if the theme heavily customizes the site, it
gives the impression that the site is broken) until the cache is cleared.
This can happen in busy sites when 2 concurrent requests recompile the
JavaScript files of a theme at the same time (this can happen when deploying a
new Discourse version) and request A updates the database cache after request B
did, and request B updates the distributed cache after request A did.
Internal ticket: t60783.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Co-authored-by: Osama Sayegh <asooomaasoooma90@gmail.com>
The values in Discourse dropdown menus only come from admin-defined strings, not unsanitised end-user input, so this lack of escaping was not exploitable.
All current browser treat the HTML document (not the body element) as
the scrollable document element. Hence in all current browsers,
`document.body.scrollTop` returns 0. This commit removes all usage of
this property, because it is effectively 0.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
After this commit, category group permissions can only be seen by users
that are allowed to manage a category. In the past, we inadvertently
included a category's group permissions settings in `CategoriesController#show`
and `CategoriesController#find_by_slug` endpoints for normal users when
those settings are only a concern to users that can manage a category.
The permissions for the 'everyone' group were not serialized because
the list of groups a user can view did not include it. This bug was
introduced in commit dfaf9831f7.
Since 3fd7b31a2a some tests
were failing with this error:
> Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /c/feature/find_by_slug.json
> (GET) at http://localhost:7357/assets/test-helpers.js
This commit fixes the issue by adding the missing pretender. Also
noticed while fixing this that the parameter for the translation
was incorrect -- it was `group` instead of `groupNames`, so that
is fixed here too, along with moving the onShow functions into
@afterRender decorated private functions. There is no need for the
appevent listeners.
Our group fabrication creates groups with name "my_group_#{n}" where n
is the sequence number of the group being created. However, this can
cause the test to be flaky if and when a group with name `my_group_10`
is created as it will be ordered before
`my_group_9`. This commits makes the group names determinstic to
eliminate any flakiness.
This reverts commit 558bc6b746.
In certain instances when viewing a category, the name of a group with
restricted visilbity may be revealed to users which do not have the
required permission.
accept HTML attribute is not fully supported on iOS yet and can contain
only MIME types. This changes the input to allow all files and the
extension check is performed later in JavaScript.
When changing to uppy for file uploads we forgot to add
these conditions to the paste event from 9c96511ec4
Basically, if you are pasting more than just a file (e.g. text,
html, rtf), then we should not handle the file and upload it, and
instead just paste in the text. This causes issues with spreadsheet
tools, that will copy the text representation and also an image
representation of cells to the user's clipboard.
This also moves the paste event for composer-upload-uppy to the
element found by the `editorClass` property, so it shares the paste
event with d-editor (via TextareaTextManipulation), which makes testing
this possible as the ember paste bindings are not picked up unless both
paste events are on the same element.
Combines 68fe6903f7 and
7b7e707fa2.
We no longer use jQuery UI for anything since getting
rid of jQuery file uploader in 667a8a6,
so we can safely remove these now.
Also removes the blueimp-file-upload and jquery.iframe-transport
dependencies that were formerly used by jQuery file uploader
This reverts commit f43bba8d59.
Adding randomness has introduced a lot of flakiness in our ember-cli tests. We should fix those issues at the source. However, given the upcoming stable release, this randomness has been reverted so that the stable release includes a stable test suite. Having a stable test suite on stable will make backporting future commits much easier.
When staff visits the user profile of another user, the `email` field
in the model is empty. In this case, staff cannot send the reset email
password because nothing is passed in the `login` field.
This commit changes the behavior for staff users to allow resetting
password by username instead.
