Commit Graph

177 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krzysztof Kotlarek
bb01563682
FIX: post mover validation color and message (#15688)
When the record is not saved, we should display a proper message.
One potential reason can be plugins for example discourse-calendar is specifying that only first post can contain event
2022-02-02 16:22:52 +11:00
Jarek Radosz
0d9ab0beb3
DEV: Fix a flaky spec (#15529)
It's very much possible for there to be a topic with id 999.
2022-01-11 01:51:57 +01:00
Peter Zhu
ab33d44bf6 DEV: Fix tests broken in 3.0 due to separation of keyword arguments
Tests fail in Ruby 3.0 and later due to separation of positional and
keyword arguments. RSpec treats the hash at the end of include_examples
as keyword arguments when it should be passed as a positional argument.
2022-01-05 13:37:52 -05:00
Daniel Waterworth
4a0f73a337
PERF: Turn common test prefixes into contexts in topics_controller_spec (#15439) 2022-01-03 11:00:03 -06:00
Daniel Waterworth
9e18868c31
DEV: Re-organize TopicsController#reset_new tests (#15399) 2021-12-23 12:29:51 -06:00
Daniel Waterworth
80591724cf
DEV: Avoid shadowing variables in topics_controller_spec (#15383) 2021-12-21 12:28:12 -06:00
Jarek Radosz
c209be09f1
DEV: Fix a flaky test (#15374)
See: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/runs/4589134998?check_suite_focus=true
2021-12-21 02:21:47 +01:00
Daniel Waterworth
61e449379c
PERF: Prefabricate posters in topics_controller_spec (#15297)
It would be clearer to prefabricate posts, but that changes redis and
enabling snapshotting for all the tests in topics_controller_spec is
expensive.
2021-12-14 12:09:07 -06:00
Daniel Waterworth
9334abe249
PERF: Prefabricate more of topics_controller_spec.rb (#15281) 2021-12-13 13:44:55 -06:00
Daniel Waterworth
02245ce41f
PERF: Redis snapshotting during tests (#15260)
We can fake redis transactions so that `fab!` works for redis and PG
data, but it's too slow to be used indiscriminately. Instead, you can
opt into it with the `use_redis_snapshotting` helper.

Insofar as snapshotting allows us to `fab!` more things, it provides a
speedup.
2021-12-10 14:25:26 -06:00
David Taylor
cfb6199a95
FIX: Don't redirect XHR/JSON requests when login is required (#15093)
When redirecting to login, we store a destination_url cookie, which the user is then redirected to after login. We never want the user to be redirected to a JSON URL. Instead, we should return a 403 in these situations.

This should also be much less confusing for API consumers - a 403 is a better representation than a 302.
2021-12-02 15:12:25 +00:00
Jean
8d73730c44
FEATURE: Add setting to disable notifications for topic tags edits (#14794) 2021-11-02 13:53:21 -04:00
Jean
92f4cdd330
FEATURE: bypass topic bump when disable_category_edit_notifications is enabled (#14754) 2021-10-27 17:05:10 -04:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
d0595127cc
FIX: Missing excerpt for post small actions in topic timeline. (#14547) 2021-10-12 09:20:35 +08:00
Yasuo Honda
dbbfad7ed0 FIX: Support Ruby 3 keyword arguments 2021-10-05 11:25:00 -04:00
Dan Ungureanu
76a7b75d8a
DEV: Reuse can_invite_to_forum? in can_invite_to? (#14392)
This commit resolves refactors can_invite_to? to use
can_invite_to_forum? for checking the site-wide permissions and then
perform topic specific checkups.

Similarly, can_invite_to? is always used with a topic object and this is
now enforced.

There was another problem before when `must_approve_users` site setting
was not checked when inviting users to forum, but was checked when
inviting to a topic.

Another minor security issue was that group owners could invite to
group topics even if they did not have the minimum trust level to do
it.
2021-09-29 17:40:16 +03:00
Martin Brennan
22208836c5
DEV: Ignore bookmarks.topic_id column and remove references to it in code (#14289)
We don't need no stinkin' denormalization! This commit ignores
the topic_id column on bookmarks, to be deleted at a later date.
We don't really need this column and it's better to rely on the
post.topic_id as the canonical topic_id for bookmarks, then we
don't need to remember to update both columns if the bookmarked
post moves to another topic.
2021-09-15 10:16:54 +10:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
bc23dcd30b
FIX: Don't publish PM archive events to acting user. (#14291)
When a user archives a personal message, they are redirected back to the
inbox and will refresh the list of the topics for the given filter.
Publishing an event to the user results in an incorrect incoming message
because the list of topics has already been refreshed.

This does mean that if a user has two tabs opened, the non-active tab
will not receive the incoming message but at this point we do not think
the technical trade-offs are worth it to support this feature. We
basically have to somehow exclude a client from an incoming message
which is not easy to do.

Follow-up to fc1fd1b416
2021-09-10 09:20:50 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
ee8c943326
FIX: Remove dismissed new topics from PM topic tracking state. (#14288)
Follow-up to fc1fd1b416
2021-09-09 12:39:27 +08:00
Martin Brennan
1646856974
FIX: Topic reset_new unscoped causing huge queries (#14158)
Since ad3ec5809f when a user chooses
the Dismiss New... option in the New topic list, we send a request
to topics/reset-new.json with ?tracked=false as the only parameter.

This then uses Topic as the scope for topics to dismiss, with no
other limitations. When we do topic_scope.pluck(:id), it gets the
ID of every single topic in the database (that is not deleted) to
pass to TopicsBulkAction, causing a huge query with severe performance
issues.

This commit changes the default scope to use
`TopicQuery.new(current_user).new_results(limit: false)`
which should only use the topics in the user's New list, which
will be a much smaller list, depending on the user's "new_topic_duration_minutes"
setting.
2021-08-26 11:25:20 +10:00
Andrei Prigorshnev
09ad3ed41d
FEATURE: revert disallowing putting URLs in titles for TL0 users (#13970)
This reverts a part of changes introduced by https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/13947

In that PR I:
1. Disallowed topic feature links for TL-0 users
2. Additionally, disallowed just putting any URL in topic titles for TL-0 users

Actually, we don't need the second part. It introduced unnecessary complexity for no good reason. In fact, it tries to do the job that anti-spam plugins (like Akismet plugin) should be doing.

This PR reverts this second change.
2021-08-06 20:07:42 +04:00
Andrei Prigorshnev
0c0a11b66a
FEATURE: Disallow putting urls in the title for TL-0 users (#13947)
This disallows putting URLs in topic titles for TL0 users, which means that:

If a TL-0 user puts a link into the title, a topic featured link won't be generated (as if it was disabled in the site settings)
Server methods for creating and updating topics will be refusing featured links when they are called by TL-0 users
TL-0 users won't be able to put any link into the topic title. For example, the title "Hey, take a look at https://my-site.com" will be rejected.

Also, it improves a bit server behavior when creating or updating feature links on topics in the categories with disabled featured links. Before the server just silently ignored a featured link field that was passed to him, now it will be returning 422 response.
2021-08-05 13:38:39 +04:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
3f59ccefd7 FIX: Remove limit on dismissing unread and new messages.
Follow-up to 2c046cc670
2021-08-05 14:55:38 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
2c046cc670 FEATURE: Dismiss new and unread for PM inboxes. 2021-08-05 12:56:15 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
2b5625bbf0
FIX: Avoid creating a post revision when topic tags have not changed. (#13881)
Co-authored-by: jmperez127 <jmperez127@gmail.com>
2021-07-29 08:14:25 -04:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
1780961e70 DEV: Fix flaky topics invite spec due to id collision.
The hardcoded group id eventually became a valid group id leading to 2
groups being attached to the invite.
2021-07-27 13:59:07 +08:00
Vinoth Kannan
5a93893b08
FIX: use correct URL in schema markup for post images. (#13847)
Currently, it wrongly adds Discourse base URL in prefix even for CDN URLs.
2021-07-26 21:39:51 +05:30
Guhyoun Nam
0dc96ce817
FEATURE: Setting to allow moderators to change post ownership (#13708) 2021-07-13 09:40:11 -05:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
37b8ce79c9
FEATURE: Add last visit indication to topic view page. (#13471)
This PR also removes grey old unread bubble from the topic badges by
dropping `TopicUser#highest_seen_post_number`.
2021-07-05 14:17:31 +08:00
Martin Brennan
6fe78cd542
FIX: Make sure reset-new for tracked is not limited by per_page count (#13395)
When dismissing new topics for the Tracked filter, the dismiss was
limited to 30 topics which is the default per page count for TopicQuery.
This happened even if you specified which topic IDs you were
selectively dismissing. This PR fixes that bug, and also moves
the per_page_count into a DEFAULT_PER_PAGE_COUNT for the TopicQuery
so it can be stubbed in tests.

Also moves the unused stub_const method into the spec helpers
for cases like this; it is much better to handle this in one place
with an ensure. In a follow up PR I will clean up other specs that
do the same thing and make them use stub_const.
2021-06-17 08:20:09 +10:00
Bianca Nenciu
c247776c65
FIX: One-by-off error in topic show action (#13183)
The not found condition did not work for topics with chunk_size posts,
because it considered it has two pages, but it only has one.
2021-05-28 11:36:45 +03:00
Martin Brennan
7a79bd7da3
FEATURE: Allow selective dismissal of new and unread topics (#12976)
This PR improves the UI of bulk select so that its context is applied to the Dismiss Unread and Dismiss New buttons. Regular users (not just staff) are now able to use topic bulk selection on the /new and /unread routes to perform these dismiss actions more selectively.

For Dismiss Unread, there is a new count in the text of the button and in the modal when one or more topic is selected with the bulk select checkboxes.

For Dismiss New, there is a count in the button text, and we have added functionality to the server side to accept an array of topic ids to dismiss new for, instead of always having to dismiss all new, the same as the bulk dismiss unread functionality. To clean things up, the `DismissTopics` service has been rolled into the `TopicsBulkAction` service.

We now also show the top Dismiss/Dismiss New button based on whether the bottom one is in the viewport, not just based on the topic count.
2021-05-26 09:38:46 +10:00
Martin Brennan
292017dd25
FIX: Do not call :post_edited webhook twice when editing OP (#13112)
When editing the first post for the topic we do two AJAX requests
to two separate controllers in this order:

PUT /t/topic-name
PUT /posts/2489523

This causes two post revisor calls, which end up triggering the
:post_edited DiscourseEvent twice. This is then picked up and sent
as a WebHook event twice. However we do not need to send a :post_edited
webhook event if the first post is being edited and topic_changed is
true from the :post_edited DiscourseEvent, because a second event will
shortly come through for just the post.

See https://meta.discourse.org/t/post-webhook-fires-two-times-on-post-edited-for-first-post-in-a-topic/162408

Continued on from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/10590
2021-05-24 09:10:22 +10:00
Josh Soref
59097b207f
DEV: Correct typos and spelling mistakes (#12812)
Over the years we accrued many spelling mistakes in the code base. 

This PR attempts to fix spelling mistakes and typos in all areas of the code that are extremely safe to change 

- comments
- test descriptions
- other low risk areas
2021-05-21 11:43:47 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
4a2912233c
FIX: flaky specs after topic view custom filters (#13019)
* FIX: flaky specs after topic view custom filters

When ensuring TopicView class variables return to the original state it should use empty Hash instead of empty Array. That

https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/lib/topic_view.rb#L60

* FIX: convert to string for topic view custom filter
2021-05-11 11:24:14 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
a4bd1806d9
FEATURE: ability to register custom filters for posts (#12938)
Allow plugins to extend TopicView to filter posts
2021-05-10 08:57:58 +10:00
Dan Ungureanu
cfee2728ce
FEATURE: New share topic modal (#12804)
The old share modal used to host both share and invite functionality,
under two tabs. The new "Share Topic" modal can be used only for
sharing, but has a link to the invite modal.

Among the sharing methods, there is also "Notify" which points out
that existing users will simply be notified (this was not clear
before). Staff members can notify as many users as they want, but
regular users are restricted to one at a time, no more than
max_topic_invitations_per_day. The user will not receive another
notification if they have been notified of the same topic in past hour.

The "Create Invite" modal also suffered some changes: the two radio
boxes for selecting the type (invite or email) have been replaced by a
single checkbox (is email?) and then the two labels about emails have
been replaced by a single one, some fields were reordered and the
advanced options toggle was moved to the bottom right of the modal.
2021-04-23 19:18:23 +03:00
Dan Ungureanu
dffc3a2f8e
DEV: Add tests for invite system (#12524) 2021-03-25 18:26:22 +02:00
Daniel Waterworth
9c3d5f861d
DEV: Speed up topics_controller_spec.rb (#12395) 2021-03-17 10:25:43 -05:00
jbrw
ac7773a30d
FEATURE: allow category group moderators to pin/unpin topics (#12325)
* FEATURE: allow category group moderators to pin/unpin topics

Category group moderators should be able to pin/unpin any topics within a category where they have appropraite category group moderator permissions.
2021-03-09 16:05:11 -05:00
Blake Erickson
2123561125
FIX: Mobile app notification urls w/ subfolder (#12282)
The urls that we generate for mobile post notifications don't take into
account the subfolder url if a site happens to have one configured. When
this happens when you tap on a new mobile notification it takes you to
a url that doesn't work because it is missing the subfolder portion.

I honestly think this should be handled in the Post model like we do
with the Topic model. `Post.url` should know how to handle subfolder
installs, but that seemed like a very risky change because there are
lots of other places in the codebase where we tack on the base_path and
I didn't want to risk duplicating it.

I also found a small typo in the topics controller spec.
2021-03-04 07:07:37 -07:00
Osama Sayegh
69017298e8
FIX: Limit post read time to the max integer value (#12126)
Some users somehow manage to keep a topic open for a very long time that it causes the post read time to exceed the max integer value (2^31 - 1) which causes errors when we try to update the read time in the database to values above the integer limit.

This PR will cap posts read time at 2^31 - 1 to prevent these errors.
2021-02-18 17:48:15 +03:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
ad3ec5809f
FIX: Dismiss new with better migration (#12062)
Original PR was reverted because of broken migration https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12058

I fixed it by adding this line
```
          AND topics.id IN(SELECT id FROM topics ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT :max_new_topics)
```

This time it is left joining a limited amount of topics. I tested it on few databases and it worked quite smooth
2021-02-15 08:50:33 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
a696cc07d2
Revert "FEATURE: Ability to dismiss all new topics (#12018)" (#12058)
This reverts commits 7426764af4 and f5b18e2a31
2021-02-12 08:50:25 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
f5b18e2a31
FEATURE: Ability to dismiss all new topics (#12018)
Follow up https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/11968

Dismiss all new topics using the same DismissTopicService. In addition, MessageBus receives exact topic ids which should be marked as `seen`.
2021-02-11 13:35:09 +11:00
Vinoth Kannan
7354636502
FIX: return 404 not found error if a topic is deleted. (#11987)
Currently, it's returning 403 invalid access error which causes issue in Google webmaster tools.
2021-02-09 16:47:06 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
354ec6694a
FEATURE: Ability to dismiss new topics in a specific tag (#11968)
* FEATURE: Ability to dismiss new topics in a specific tag

Follow up of https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/11927

Using the same mechanism to disable new topics in a tag.

* FIX: respect when category and tag is selected
2021-02-09 10:39:30 +11:00
Martin Brennan
4af77f1e38
FEATURE: Allow durations < 1 hour and < 1 day for topic timers where duration is specified (auto delete replies, close based on last post) (#11961)
This PR allows entering a float value for topic timers e.g. 0.5 for 30 minutes when entering hours, 0.5 for 12 hours when entering days. This is achieved by adding a new column to store the duration of a topic timer in minutes instead of the ambiguous both hours and days that it could be before.

This PR has ommitted the post migration to delete the duration column in topic timers; it will be done in a subsequent PR to ensure that no data is lost if the UPDATE query to set duration_mintues fails.

I have to keep the old keyword of duration in set_or_create_topic_timer for backwards compat, will remove at a later date after plugins are updated.
2021-02-05 10:12:56 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
f39e7fe81d
FEATURE: New way to dismiss new topics (#11927)
This is a try to simplify logic around dismiss new topics to have one solution to work in all places - dismiss all-new, dismiss new in a specific category or even in a specific tag.
2021-02-04 11:27:34 +11:00
Dan Ungureanu
c3bab3ef38
FIX: Make category change work with shared drafts (#11705)
It used to change the category of the topic, instead of the destination
category (topic.category_id instead of topic.shared_draft.category_id).

The shared drafts controls were displayed only if the current category
matched the 'shared drafts category', which was not true for shared
drafts that had their categories changed (affected by the previous bug).
2021-01-14 19:20:34 +02:00