Commit Graph

325 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
3f59ccefd7 FIX: Remove limit on dismissing unread and new messages.
Follow-up to 2c046cc670
2021-08-05 14:55:38 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
2c046cc670 FEATURE: Dismiss new and unread for PM inboxes. 2021-08-05 12:56:15 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
2b5625bbf0
FIX: Avoid creating a post revision when topic tags have not changed. (#13881)
Co-authored-by: jmperez127 <jmperez127@gmail.com>
2021-07-29 08:14:25 -04:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
2654a6685c
DEV: adds support for bannered until (#13417)
ATM it only implements server side of it, as my need is for automation purposes. However it should probably be added in the UI too as it's unexpected to have pinned_until and no bannered_until.
2021-06-24 11:35:36 +02:00
Martin Brennan
6fe78cd542
FIX: Make sure reset-new for tracked is not limited by per_page count (#13395)
When dismissing new topics for the Tracked filter, the dismiss was
limited to 30 topics which is the default per page count for TopicQuery.
This happened even if you specified which topic IDs you were
selectively dismissing. This PR fixes that bug, and also moves
the per_page_count into a DEFAULT_PER_PAGE_COUNT for the TopicQuery
so it can be stubbed in tests.

Also moves the unused stub_const method into the spec helpers
for cases like this; it is much better to handle this in one place
with an ensure. In a follow up PR I will clean up other specs that
do the same thing and make them use stub_const.
2021-06-17 08:20:09 +10:00
Martin Brennan
e15c86e8c5
DEV: Topic tracking state improvements (#13218)
I merged this PR in yesterday, finally thinking this was done https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12958 but then a wild performance regression occurred. These are the problem methods:

1aa20bd681/app/serializers/topic_tracking_state_serializer.rb (L13-L21)

Turns out date comparison is super expensive on the backend _as well as_ the frontend.

The fix was to just move the `treat_as_new_topic_start_date` into the SQL query rather than using the slower `UserOption#treat_as_new_topic_start_date` method in ruby. After this change, 1% of the total time is spent with the `created_in_new_period` comparison instead of ~20%.

----

History:

Original PR which had to be reverted **https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12555**. See the description there for what this PR is achieving, plus below.

The issue with the original PR is addressed in 92ef54f402

If you went to the `x unread` link for a tag Chrome would freeze up and possibly crash, or eventually unfreeze after nearly 10 mins. Other routes for unread/new were similarly slow. From profiling the issue was the `sync` function of `topic-tracking-state.js`, which calls down to `isNew` which in turn calls `moment`, a change I had made in the PR above. The time it takes locally with ~1400 topics in the tracking state is 2.3 seconds.

To solve this issue, I have moved these calculations for "created in new period" and "unread not too old" into the tracking state serializer.

When I was looking at the profiler I also noticed this issue which was just compounding the problem. Every time we modify topic tracking state we recalculate the sidebar tracking/everything/tag counts. However this calls `forEachTracked` and `countTags` which can be quite expensive as they go through the whole tracking state (and were also calling the removed moment functions).

I added some logs and this was being called 30 times when navigating to a new /unread route because  `sync` is being called from `build-topic-route` (one for each topic loaded due to pagination). So I just added a debounce here and it makes things even faster.

Finally, I changed topic tracking state to use a Map so our counts of the state keys is faster (Maps have .size whereas objects you have to do Object.keys(obj) which is O(n).)

<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
2021-06-02 09:06:29 +10:00
Osama Sayegh
b81b24dea2
Revert "DEV: Topic tracking state improvements (#12958)" (#13209)
This reverts commit 002c676344.

Perf regression, we will redo it.
2021-05-31 17:47:42 +10:00
Martin Brennan
002c676344
DEV: Topic tracking state improvements (#12958)
Original PR which had to be reverted **https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12555**. See the description there for what this PR is achieving, plus below.

The issue with the original PR is addressed in 92ef54f402

If you went to the `x unread` link for a tag Chrome would freeze up and possibly crash, or eventually unfreeze after nearly 10 mins. Other routes for unread/new were similarly slow. From profiling the issue was the `sync` function of `topic-tracking-state.js`, which calls down to `isNew` which in turn calls `moment`, a change I had made in the PR above. The time it takes locally with ~1400 topics in the tracking state is 2.3 seconds.

To solve this issue, I have moved these calculations for "created in new period" and "unread not too old" into the tracking state serializer.

When I was looking at the profiler I also noticed this issue which was just compounding the problem. Every time we modify topic tracking state we recalculate the sidebar tracking/everything/tag counts. However this calls `forEachTracked` and `countTags` which can be quite expensive as they go through the whole tracking state (and were also calling the removed moment functions).

I added some logs and this was being called 30 times when navigating to a new /unread route because  `sync` is being called from `build-topic-route` (one for each topic loaded due to pagination). So I just added a debounce here and it makes things even faster.

Finally, I changed topic tracking state to use a Map so our counts of the state keys is faster (Maps have .size whereas objects you have to do Object.keys(obj) which is O(n).)
2021-05-31 09:22:28 +10:00
Bianca Nenciu
c247776c65
FIX: One-by-off error in topic show action (#13183)
The not found condition did not work for topics with chunk_size posts,
because it considered it has two pages, but it only has one.
2021-05-28 11:36:45 +03:00
Martin Brennan
7a79bd7da3
FEATURE: Allow selective dismissal of new and unread topics (#12976)
This PR improves the UI of bulk select so that its context is applied to the Dismiss Unread and Dismiss New buttons. Regular users (not just staff) are now able to use topic bulk selection on the /new and /unread routes to perform these dismiss actions more selectively.

For Dismiss Unread, there is a new count in the text of the button and in the modal when one or more topic is selected with the bulk select checkboxes.

For Dismiss New, there is a count in the button text, and we have added functionality to the server side to accept an array of topic ids to dismiss new for, instead of always having to dismiss all new, the same as the bulk dismiss unread functionality. To clean things up, the `DismissTopics` service has been rolled into the `TopicsBulkAction` service.

We now also show the top Dismiss/Dismiss New button based on whether the bottom one is in the viewport, not just based on the topic count.
2021-05-26 09:38:46 +10:00
Martin Brennan
6d53005e8b
Revert "DEV: Improving topic tracking state code (#12555)" (#12864)
This reverts commit 45df579db0.

This was causing huge browser freezes and crashes.
2021-04-28 11:29:54 +10:00
Martin Brennan
45df579db0
DEV: Improving topic tracking state code (#12555)
The aim of this PR is to improve the topic tracking state JavaScript code and test coverage so further modifications can be made in plugins and in core. This is focused on making topic tracking state changes easier to respond to with callbacks, and changing it so all state modifications go through a single method instead of modifying `this.state` all over the place. I have also tried to improve documentation, make the code clearer and easier to follow, and make it clear what are public and private methods.

The changes I have made here should not break backwards compatibility, though there is no way to tell for sure if other plugin/theme authors are using tracking state methods that are essentially private methods. Any name changes made in the tracking-state.js code have been reflected in core.

----

We now have a `_trackedTopicLimit` in the tracking state. Previously, if a topic was neither new nor unread it was removed from the tracking state; now it is only removed if we are tracking more than `_trackedTopicLimit` topics (which is set to 4000). This is so plugins/themes adding topics with `TopicTrackingState.register_refine_method` can add topics to track that aren't necessarily new or unread, e.g. for totals counts.

Anywhere where we were doing `tracker.states["t" + data.topic_id] = newObject` has now been changed to flow through central `modifyState` and `modifyStateProp` methods. This is so state objects are not modified until they need to be (e.g. sometimes properties are set based on certain conditions) and also so we can run callback functions when the state is modified.

I added `onStateChange` and `onMessageIncrement` methods to register callbacks that are called when the state is changed and when the message count is incremented, respectively. This was done so we no longer need to do things like `@observes("trackingState.states")` in other Ember classes.

I split up giant functions like `sync` and `establishChannels` into smaller functions for readability and testability, and renamed many small functions to _functionName to designate them as private functions which not be called by consumers of `topicTrackingState`. Public functions are now all documented (well...at least ones that are not immediately obvious).

----

On the backend side, I have changed the MessageBus publish events for TopicTrackingState to send back tags and tag IDs for more channels, and done some extra code cleanup and refactoring. Plugins may override `TopicTrackingState.report` so I have made its footprint as small as possible and externalised the main parts of it into other methods.
2021-04-28 09:54:45 +10:00
Dan Ungureanu
cfee2728ce
FEATURE: New share topic modal (#12804)
The old share modal used to host both share and invite functionality,
under two tabs. The new "Share Topic" modal can be used only for
sharing, but has a link to the invite modal.

Among the sharing methods, there is also "Notify" which points out
that existing users will simply be notified (this was not clear
before). Staff members can notify as many users as they want, but
regular users are restricted to one at a time, no more than
max_topic_invitations_per_day. The user will not receive another
notification if they have been notified of the same topic in past hour.

The "Create Invite" modal also suffered some changes: the two radio
boxes for selecting the type (invite or email) have been replaced by a
single checkbox (is email?) and then the two labels about emails have
been replaced by a single one, some fields were reordered and the
advanced options toggle was moved to the bottom right of the modal.
2021-04-23 19:18:23 +03:00
jbrw
ac7773a30d
FEATURE: allow category group moderators to pin/unpin topics (#12325)
* FEATURE: allow category group moderators to pin/unpin topics

Category group moderators should be able to pin/unpin any topics within a category where they have appropraite category group moderator permissions.
2021-03-09 16:05:11 -05:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
ad3ec5809f
FIX: Dismiss new with better migration (#12062)
Original PR was reverted because of broken migration https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12058

I fixed it by adding this line
```
          AND topics.id IN(SELECT id FROM topics ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT :max_new_topics)
```

This time it is left joining a limited amount of topics. I tested it on few databases and it worked quite smooth
2021-02-15 08:50:33 +11:00
Martin Brennan
ff1ac57feb
FIX: Validate duration minutes values for topic timer (#12040)
Add server and client side validations to ensure topic timer durations cannot exceed 2 years and cannot be less than or equal to 0.
2021-02-12 09:05:14 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
a696cc07d2
Revert "FEATURE: Ability to dismiss all new topics (#12018)" (#12058)
This reverts commits 7426764af4 and f5b18e2a31
2021-02-12 08:50:25 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
f5b18e2a31
FEATURE: Ability to dismiss all new topics (#12018)
Follow up https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/11968

Dismiss all new topics using the same DismissTopicService. In addition, MessageBus receives exact topic ids which should be marked as `seen`.
2021-02-11 13:35:09 +11:00
Vinoth Kannan
7354636502
FIX: return 404 not found error if a topic is deleted. (#11987)
Currently, it's returning 403 invalid access error which causes issue in Google webmaster tools.
2021-02-09 16:47:06 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
354ec6694a
FEATURE: Ability to dismiss new topics in a specific tag (#11968)
* FEATURE: Ability to dismiss new topics in a specific tag

Follow up of https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/11927

Using the same mechanism to disable new topics in a tag.

* FIX: respect when category and tag is selected
2021-02-09 10:39:30 +11:00
Martin Brennan
4af77f1e38
FEATURE: Allow durations < 1 hour and < 1 day for topic timers where duration is specified (auto delete replies, close based on last post) (#11961)
This PR allows entering a float value for topic timers e.g. 0.5 for 30 minutes when entering hours, 0.5 for 12 hours when entering days. This is achieved by adding a new column to store the duration of a topic timer in minutes instead of the ambiguous both hours and days that it could be before.

This PR has ommitted the post migration to delete the duration column in topic timers; it will be done in a subsequent PR to ensure that no data is lost if the UPDATE query to set duration_mintues fails.

I have to keep the old keyword of duration in set_or_create_topic_timer for backwards compat, will remove at a later date after plugins are updated.
2021-02-05 10:12:56 +10:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
f39e7fe81d
FEATURE: New way to dismiss new topics (#11927)
This is a try to simplify logic around dismiss new topics to have one solution to work in all places - dismiss all-new, dismiss new in a specific category or even in a specific tag.
2021-02-04 11:27:34 +11:00
Dan Ungureanu
c3bab3ef38
FIX: Make category change work with shared drafts (#11705)
It used to change the category of the topic, instead of the destination
category (topic.category_id instead of topic.shared_draft.category_id).

The shared drafts controls were displayed only if the current category
matched the 'shared drafts category', which was not true for shared
drafts that had their categories changed (affected by the previous bug).
2021-01-14 19:20:34 +02:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
4928f9cceb
FIX: don't error topic RSS when posts are deleted (#11641) 2021-01-08 11:16:15 +11:00
Roman Rizzi
b45a30c40f
FIX: Users without shared drafts access can still have access to the category. (#11476)
This is an edge-case of 9fb3629. An admin could set the shared draft category to one where both TL2 and TL3 users have access but only give shared draft access to TL3 users. If something like this happens, we need to make sure that TL2 users won't be able to see them, and they won't be listed on latest.

Before this change, `SharedDrafts` were lazily created when a destination category was selected. We now create it alongside the topic and set the destination to the same shared draft category.
2020-12-14 16:08:20 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
c7b9f044a4
FEATURE: Automatically disable slow mode. (#11461)
Staff and TL4 users can decide the slow mode duration. We'll internally set a topic timer to disable it.
2020-12-14 14:06:50 -03:00
jbrw
773c51a633
FEATURE: Allow category group moderators to list/unlist topics (#11470)
* FEATURE: Allow categroy group moderators to list/unlist topics

If enabled via SiteSettings, a user belonging to a group which has been granted category group moderator privileges should be able to list/unlist topics belonging to the appropraite category.
2020-12-14 11:01:22 -05:00
Penar Musaraj
adda53c462
FEATURE: Optional filtered replies view (#11387)
See PR for details
2020-12-10 12:02:07 -05:00
Dan Ungureanu
123107c28f
UX: Add group name to error message (#11333)
The group name used to be part of the error message, but was removed
in a past commit.
2020-11-24 13:06:52 +02:00
Roman Rizzi
21c53ed249
FEATURE: Topic slow mode. (#10904)
Adds a new slow mode for topics that are heating up. Users will have to wait for a period of time before being able to post again.

We store this interval inside the topics table and track the last time a user posted using the last_posted_at datetime in the TopicUser relation.
2020-10-16 16:24:38 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
108414e47c
DEV: Users must be able to see a topic to moderate it. (#10906)
Follows-up a8c47e7c. It makes more sense to check if the user can see the topic inside the `can_moderate?` method instead of doing it separately.
2020-10-13 13:03:14 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
a8c47e7c7f
SECURITY: Ensure users can see the topic before setting a topic timer. (#10841) 2020-10-06 16:49:06 -03:00
Mark VanLandingham
b8015ab654
FIX: Dismiss unread respects tracked query param (#10714)
* WIP:  'dismiss...' respectes tracked query param

* Address review comments

* Dismiss new respects query params

* Remove comment

* Better variable name

* remove self
2020-09-25 12:39:37 -07:00
Ahmed Gagan
ddab7cc239
DEV: Add plugin api to permit bulk_action parameters (#10638) 2020-09-10 17:18:45 +01:00
Vinoth Kannan
a8502ae1c4
FEATURE: add dismiss unread topics button when filtered by tag. (#10547) 2020-08-27 23:04:45 +05:30
Guo Xiang Tan
ffc5bb7278
Revert "FIX: Topic Timer auto opening closed topics (#10524)"
This reverts commit 7cfd5f87ff.
2020-08-26 09:32:11 +08:00
Blake Erickson
7cfd5f87ff
FIX: Topic Timer auto opening closed topics (#10524)
This commit is addressing an issue where it is possible that there could
be multiple topic timer jobs running to close a topic or a weird race
condition state causing a topic that was just closed to be re-opened.

By removing the logic from the Topic Timer model into the Topic Timer
controller endpoint we isolate the code that is used for setting an
auto-open or an auto-close timer to just that functionality making the
topic timer background jobs safer if multiple are running.

Possibly in the future if we would like this logic back in the model a
refactor will be needed where we actually pass in the auto-close and
auto-open action instead of mixing it with the close and open
action that is currently being passed to the controller.
2020-08-26 11:17:12 +10:00
jbrw
67e8bc5342
FEATURE - allow category group moderators to split/merge topics (#10351) 2020-08-05 10:33:25 -04:00
Blake Erickson
8de635fe92
DEV: Show message when cannot invite user to PM (#10336)
* DEV: Show message when cannot invite user to PM

When inviting a user to a PM return a message that says, "Sorry, this
user can't be invited." if they have been muted or are not in a users
allowed pm users list.

* Minor refactor & improved some text
2020-07-31 09:52:19 -06:00
jbrw
06073fe8c6
FEATURE: Allow group moderators to close/archive topics
* FEATURE: Allow group moderators to close/archive topics
2020-07-14 12:36:19 -04:00
Jeff Wong
1509afefba DEV: simplify detailed_404 logic 2020-05-28 10:54:02 -07:00
Jeff Wong
a9d92f338e
SECURITY: make find topic by slug adhere to SiteSetting.detailed_404 (#9898) 2020-05-27 11:28:38 -07:00
Sam Saffron
5bfb6830c9
SECURITY: missing security check prior to redirect
In some rare cases, if a user knows the exact title of a topic
they could possibly determine that it really exists in the system
2020-05-27 10:58:22 +10:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
918bd75909
FIX: allows to remove a topic timer with delete_replies as type (#9800) 2020-05-18 11:47:08 +02:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX
addf9d62f8
FIX: prevents rendering topic-category if empty (#9720) 2020-05-11 17:45:28 +03:00
Robin Ward
13f2723dcb FIX: Don't log an error to logster if a topic could not be updated.
If for some reason an update did not go through (for example,
concurrently updating the same topic twice), we were logging something
like:

```
create_errors_json called with unrecognized type: #<Topic
```

This happened because we knew an error occurred but the active record
object had no errors attached.

This patch fixes the issue by attaching a proper error message in the
event that this happens.
2020-04-22 11:56:04 -04:00
Martin Brennan
628ba9d1e2
FEATURE: Promote bookmarks with reminders to core functionality (#9369)
The main thrust of this PR is to take all the conditional checks based on the `enable_bookmarks_with_reminders` away and only keep the code from the `true` path, making bookmarks with reminders the core bookmarks feature. There is also a migration to create `Bookmark` records out of `PostAction` bookmarks for a site.

### Summary

* Remove logic based on whether enable_bookmarks_with_reminders is true. This site setting is now obsolete, the old bookmark functionality is being removed. Retain the setting and set the value to `true` in a migration.
* Use the code from the rake task to create a database migration that creates bookmarks from post actions.
* Change the bookmark report to read from the new table.
* Get rid of old endpoints for bookmarks
* Link to the new bookmarks list from the user summary page
2020-04-22 13:44:19 +10:00
Jarek Radosz
17cf300b71
DEV: Use more specific error responses (#9472)
* DEV: Use `render_json_error` (Adds specs for Admin::GroupsController)
* DEV: Use a specific error on blank category slug (Fixes a `render_json_error` warning)
* DEV: Use a specific error on reviewable claim conflict (Fixes a `render_json_error` warning)
* DEV: Use specific errors in Admin::UsersController (Fixes `render_json_error` warnings)
* FIX: PublishedPages error responses
* FIX: TopicsController error responses (There was an issue of two separate `Topic` instances for the same record. This makes sure there's only one up-to-date instance.)
2020-04-21 03:50:20 +02:00
Neil Lalonde
29e733832d
FIX: error when changing a topic's category and creating a tag 2020-03-30 16:43:01 -04:00
Blake Erickson
c97244ca11 FIX: post edited webhook does not reflect updated topic title
This fix ensures that when a topic title is edited the new title shows
up in the post webhook instead of the old title.

Rather than passing in the old topic object to the PostRevisor the
PostRevisor initializer will load the updated topic object inside of the
initializer if you don't pass it in. This will allow the post_edited
webhook to have the correct topic values.

Original bug reported at:

https://meta.discourse.org/t/post-edited-webhook-does-not-reflect-updated-topic-title/144722
2020-03-21 07:43:11 -06:00