When rendering the initial search options, we re-use the `AssistantItem` component.
`AssistantItem` requires that you pass in the required params to define what _type_ of component it will be - category, tag, tag intersection, user, etc. This flexibility is nice, as we can just loop through all `@results` and pass in params, without having to predefine what _type_ of result it is.
It is is not very good when it comes to seperating the html strucutre of each unique _type_. This is an example of the initial search results:
<img width="408" alt="Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 9 04 18 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46795697-6246-4b60-be18-fea200a57baa">
You can see that both categories **and** tags are being rendered. The HTML strcuture looks like so:
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
There is no way to differentiate between the types, even though some are categories and others tags.
This PR adds a _typeClass_ to each component, that will be a additional class included at the top level of the component HTML structure.
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
_See `.category` and `.tag` attached to each `search-menu-assistant-item`._
This will help us identify which _type_ it is, and allow devs to target and customize each element by _type_.
A followup to f05b984208
* modifiers to keep track of components' lifecycles, instead of did-insert/did-update/willDestroy
* proper glimmer-friendly tracking in related models
* caching
* `@outletArgs`
* gjs
We were using a modifier purely for its lifecycle hooks - not to modify an element. This commit switches to using a helper, which provides a similar lifecycle, but without needing to be attached to an element.
Bug introduced in this PR https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29244
When the experiment toggle button was introduced, new features did not look right when the toggle button was not available.
In addition, the plugin name can be an empty string. In that case, information about new features should be displayed.
…or a tip with the highest priority.
This regressed in 597ef11195 where we got rid of `next()` calls, so we'd render the first tip we encounter.
The commit also adds a test and updates existing ones.
Moves the user-tip from the topic-timeline notifications button to the one at the bottom of the topic page.
Three reasons:
1. new users are more likely to use the button that has the full text (and description) rather than the icon-only one
2. we hide the timeline button when scrolled all the way to the bottom of the page, and then the tip doesn't seems to be attached to anything
3. we might be removing the timeline button altogether in the near future
The visitor stats on the /about page were previously showing as `NaN` immediately after enabling the `display_eu_visitor_stats` site setting because the stats for the /about page are cached and updated once every 30 minutes in a sidekiq job. The `NaN` would go away upon the next run of the relevant sidekiq job, but it's not good UX to display a cryptic `NaN` until the job runs. So, this commit ensures that the visitor stats is not displayed at all until the visitor stats is calculated and available.
Internal topic: t/128480.
This PR is a follow-up to ea1473e532. When we initially added the experimental feature for automatically adding `[grid]` to images, we add the [grid] surrounding images after all the uploads have been completed.
This can lead to confusion when `[grid]` is delayed to be added in the composer, as users may try to add grid manually leading to breakage. This also leads to issues with Discourse AI's automatic image caption feature.
**In this PR**: we simply move the logic to be added when the images are uploaded and processing. This way, `[grid]` surrounding images is added immediately. We also apply a fix for an edge-case to prevent images from being wrapped in `[grid]` when they are already inside `[grid]` tags.
Toggle the button to enable the experimental site setting from "What's new" announcement.
The toggle button is displayed when:
- site setting exists and is boolean;
- potentially required plugin is enabled.
This PR adds the feature where three or more image uploads in the composer will result in the images being surrounded by `[grid]` tags. This helps take advantage of the grid feature (https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/21513) and display images in a more appealing way immediately after upload.
These tweaks will help adoption of the non-mixin-based uppy patterns.
- Add `type:` to default arguments list
- Update pick-files-button to support explicit element registration
- Make `cancelSingleUpload` a public API, and add `cancelAllUploads`
- Remove `isDestroyed` logic - it doesn't do anything outside a component
- Add `@bind` to `setup()`
- Allow `additionalParams` to be a function
- Fix `autoStart` mixin shim
This commit simplifies the initial state of the invite modal when it's opened to make it one click away from creating an invite link. The existing options/fields within the invite modal are still available, but are now hidden behind an advanced mode which can be enabled.
On the technical front, this PR also switches the invite modal to use our FormKit library.
Internal topic: t/134023.
When a user is missing required fields, they are required to fill those up before continuing to interact with the forum. This applies to admins as well.
We keep a whitelist of paths that can still be visited in this mode: FAQ, About, 2FA setup, and any admin route for admins.
We concluded that admins should still be able to enable safe mode even with missing required fields. Since plugins etc. can potentially mess with the ability to fill those up.
When adding or updating a custom user field to apply to all users (retroactively) we want to alert the admin that this will force all existing users to fill up the field before they are able to access the forum again.
However, we currently show this prompt when making changes only to other attributes on the custom field, i.e. the requirement hasn't changed.
This commit fixes that.
