* DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1
* FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`
`Rails.logger.chained` was provided by Logster before Rails 7.1
introduced their broadcast logger. Now all the loggers are added to
`Rails.logger.broadcasts`.
Some code in our initializers was still using `chained` instead of
`broadcasts`.
* DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods
* FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)
A followup to f595d599dd
* FIX: Don’t duplicate Rack response
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
* DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1
* FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`
`Rails.logger.chained` was provided by Logster before Rails 7.1
introduced their broadcast logger. Now all the loggers are added to
`Rails.logger.broadcasts`.
Some code in our initializers was still using `chained` instead of
`broadcasts`.
* DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods
* FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)
A followup to f595d599dd
* FIX: Don’t duplicate Rack response
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
* Revert "FIX: Set `override_level` on Logster loggers (#27519)"
This reverts commit c1b0488c54.
* Revert "DEV: Make parameters optional to all FakeLogger methods"
This reverts commit 3318dad7b4.
* Revert "FIX: Remove references to `Rails.logger.chained`"
This reverts commit f595d599dd.
* Revert "DEV: Upgrade Rails to 7.1"
This reverts commit 081b00391e.
There is currently only one scenario when both the composer and a user card would be present at the same time:
if you have the composer open and then you click on something outside it that triggers a card. Which implies intent to see the card (unobstructed by the composer 😉)
The reverse doesn't happen because opening the composer would close an existing user card.
In theory there's also displaying a user card by clicking on a mention in composer's preview but that functionality is currently broken (and this PR is a prerequisite 😉)
---
I changed `.user-card, .group-card` to `.fk-d-menu[data-identifier="card"]` because that regressed when we moved user cards to float-kit – they are nested inside `.fk-d-menu` so its `z-index` is now important (effectively the cards had `z-index: z("dropdown")` instead of `z("usercard")`)
Wasn't quite handling the cases where a closing bracket `]` was used in the value of one of the attributes.
```markdown
[chat quote=user channel="[broken]"]
```
Would not be correctly parsed because we would _greedily_ use the first `]` as the end of the tag even though it might be a valid character when inside proper quotes.
c39a4de139/app/assets/javascripts/discourse-markdown-it/src/features/bbcode-block.js (L62)
Re-wrote the `parseBBCodeTag` to properly handle the following cases
- A closing tag (aka `[/name]`) which are easy since they don't have any attributes
- An old `[quote=...]` format we used that doesn't uses quotes but still has various attributes of the form `key:value`
- All three valid BBCode opening tag formats we support
- `[name]` without any attributes
- `[name=foo]` with a default value
- `[name foo=bar]` with some attributes
Ended up having to fix/rewrite the few bbcode rules that were using the `parseBBCodeTag` function, namely `d-wrap` and `discourse-local-dates`.
While working on this, I think I also found a way to get rid the of shims we had in place so that plugins could use the `parseBBCodeTag` function.
Reference - https://meta.discourse.org/t/having-a-right-bracket-in-a-channel-name-breaks-all-quotes-from-that-channel/308439
* remove default prop values where they're being set in constructor
* replace some `||` operators in constructors with `??` so the fallback boolean values are actually used
* remove an unused service injection (and sort the rest)
* remove unused prop
* inline an arg check
* remove an unnecessary `?.` operator
* sort element attributes
This change replaces the chat drawer tabs with new drawer routes for channels, direct messages and threads.
The main objective is to improve navigation within drawer, now that we have separation of chat sections in drawer.
The order of chat direct message groups can sometimes place usernames in an unexpected order, this change tests multiple combinations of usernames and accepts them no matter what order they are in.
In 4e7a75a7ec, we moved to a single admin plugin page and added a few fields to the "plugin serializer" but we already had a proper route with the correct serializers to properly load channels.
This fixes it by removing the "add_to_serializer" calls and changed the calls to "/admin/plugins/chat.json" to the proper "/admin/plugins/chat/hooks.json" route.
Meta - https://meta.discourse.org/t/names-are-missing-from-list-when-creating-new-chat-channel-webhooks/308481
When chat is enabled, there's a scheduled job that runs every 5 minutes to check whether we need to send a "chat summary" email to users with unread chat messages or mentions.
On Discourse with a large number of users, the query used wasn't optimal and sometimes taking minutes. Which isn't good when the query is called every 5 minutes 😬
This PR reworks the query in `Chat::Mailer.send_unread_mentions_summary`.
Instead of starting from the `users` table, it starts from the `user_chat_channel_memberships` table which is the main piece tying everything together.
The new query is mostly similar to the previous one, with some bug fixes (like ensuring the user has `allow_private_messages` enabled for direct messages) and is also slightly simpler since it doesn't keep track of the `memberships_with_unread_messages` anymore. That part has been moved to the `user_notifications.chat_summary` email method.
The `UserEmailExtension` has been deleted since that was using to N+1 update the `user_chat_channel_memberships.last_unread_mention_when_emailed_it`(quite a mouthful 😛) but that's now done directly in the `user_notifications.chat_summary` email method.
The "plat de résistance" of that PR - the `user_notifications.chat_summary` method has been re-worked for improved performances 🚀
Instead of doing everything in one query, it does 4 tiny ones.
- One to retrieve the list of unread mentions (@something) in "category" channels
- One to retrieve the list of unread messages in "direct message" channels (aka. 1-1 and group discussions)
- One to load all the chat messages for each "category" channels from the last unread mention
- One to load all the chat messages for each "direct message" channels from the last unread message
All the specs for both `Chat::Mailer` and `UserNotification.chat_summary` have been rewriten for easier comprehension and faster execution (mostly by not using chat services which makes the specs go 10x slower...)
Internal ref - t/129848
When adding custom translations for tests using `I18n.backend.store_translations`,
we need to remove the custom translations at the end of each test to
prevent the custom translations from leaking to other tests.
This change prevents explicitly declaring each route that should be intercepted for chat drawer mode.
In theory all chat drawer routes should be intercepted from the main chat routes file and therefore we would only need to add new drawer routes directly within chat-drawer-router.js.
This change allows chat drawer users to edit channel settings and members without leaving drawer mode. If a channel is open within chat drawer and the user clicks the Channel name, it will load channel settings within the drawer.
This change allows the correct number of members to be added when creating a group direct message, based on the site setting chat_max_direct_message_users.
Previously we counted the current user within the max user limit and therefore the count was off by 1.
Before this fix we could only list messages of a thread if it was part of a `threading_enabled` channel or if the thread was set to `force`.
Due to our design of also using a thread id when this is just a chain of replies so we can switch from threading enabled to disabled at any time, we will allow `Chat:: ListChannelThreadMessages` to list the messages of any thread, the only important requirements are:
- having a thread id
- being able to access this thread
To allow this, this commit simply removes the check on `threading_enabled` or `force`.
Under some circumstances, the TextField component could trigger a `Assertion Failed: You attempted to update attrs on ..., but it had already been used previously in the same computation...` error, causing the Ember app to crash.
A few follup changes after changing to the chat footer split for drawer:
* Fixing a bug that stretched the unread indicator on mobile
* Minor style changes in hover/focus behaviour for chat drawer
* Repositioning of unread indicator so it has more space at the top of the footer
* Using the `c-unread-indicator` mixin
Was "removing" (rather not re-applying) the `[spoiler]` BBCode because we were testing the **whole** class of the `span`/`div` was `spoiled` but we added another class and thus broke this functionnality.
In order to fix this issue, the test to determine whether a `span`/`div` is a spoiler, now uses a regular expression to check whether the `class` **contains** the word `spoiled`.
Reference - https://meta.discourse.org/t/quoting-spoiler-text-doesnt-include-spoiler-tags-in-the-quote/170145
Adds a placeholder image + CTA in chat, for empty channel and DM lists.
On desktop with drawer mode, we split chat into tabs (like mobile).
---------
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Battersby <info@davidbattersby.com>
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
In this PR service objects were moved to Core https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/26506
However, ServiceRunner should be moved as well. Mostly for CI to run effortlessly without loading plugins.
Prior to this fix we had too logic to detect if a user is active or not:
- idle codepath on the frontend
- online user ids on the backend
The frontend solution is not very reliable, and both solution are just trying to be too smart. Making a lot of people questioning why they receive a notification sometimes and sometimes not. This commit removes all this logic and replaces it with a much more simpler logic:
- you can't receive notifications for channel you are actually watching
- we won't play a sound more than once every 3seconds
The `onNotification` signature is:
```
onNotification(data, siteSettings, user, appEvents)
```
And we were not passing `appEvents`.
Also explicitly inject `currentUser` in `chat-notification-manager` service.
We consider that you should always receive a notification sound when someone speaks directly with you in chat.
This commit also refactors the way we play audio in chat to make it simpler and throttle it to 3 seconds.
We also added a safeguard to ensure we won't play sounds for old messages, this case can happen when message bus is catching up the backlog (eg: in an inactive tab for example).
