Commit Graph

43 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Isaac Janzen
dd495a0e19
FEATURE: Allow admins to delete reviewables via API (#21174)
This PR adds the ability to destroy reviewables for a passed user via the API. This was not possible before as this action was reserved for reviewables for you created only.

If a user is an admin and calls the `#destroy` action from the API they are able to destroy a reviewable for a passed user. A user can be targeted by passed either their:
- username
- external_id (for SSO) 

to the request.

In the case you attempt to destroy a non-personal reviewable and
- You are not an admin
- You do not access the `#destroy` action via the API

you will raise a `Discourse::InvalidAccess` (403) and will not succeed in destroying the reviewable.
2023-04-20 09:38:41 -05:00
Blake Erickson
c540167982
FIX: Remove action buttons if post has already been reviewed (#20126)
* FIX: Remove action buttons if post has already been reviewed

* Change the approve to reject test to expect an error

* Adds a controller spec to ensure you can't edit a non-pending review item

* Remove unnessary conditional
2023-02-06 11:55:52 -07:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
ce531913a8
FIX: Sync user's reviewables count when loading reviewables list (#20128)
1. What is the problem here?

When a user's reviewables count changes, the changes are published via
MessageBus in a background Sidekiq job which means there is a delay before the
client receives the MessageBus message with the updated count. During
the time the reviewables count for a user has been updated and the time
when the client receives the MessageBus message with the updated count,
a user may view the reviewables list in the user menu. When that happens, the number of
reviewables in the list may be out of sync with the count shown.

2. What is the fix?

Going forward, the response for the `ReviewablesController#user_menu_list` action will include the user's reviewables count as
the `reviewables_count` attribute. This is then used by the client side
to update the user's reviewables count to ensure that the reviewables
list and count are kept in sync.
2023-02-02 10:19:51 +08:00
David Taylor
cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to spec/* 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Jarek Radosz
c32fe340f0
DEV: Fix mocha deprecations (#18828)
It now supports strict keyword argument matching by default.
2022-11-02 10:47:59 +01:00
Osama Sayegh
079450c9e4
DEV: Do not show handled reviewables in the user menu (#18402)
Currently, the reviewables tab in the user menu shows pending reviewables at the top of the menu and fills the remaining space in the menu with old/handled reviewables. This PR makes the revieables tab show only pending reviewables and hides the tab altogether from the menu if there are no pending reviewables. We're going to follow-up with another change soon that will show pending reviewables in the main tab of the user menu.

Internal topic: t/73220.
2022-09-30 06:10:07 +03:00
Loïc Guitaut
3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Osama Sayegh
ce9eec8606
DEV: Combine all header notification bubbles into one in the new user menu (#17718)
Extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-08-03 08:57:59 +03:00
Osama Sayegh
988a175e94
DEV: Add reviewables tab to the new user menu (#17630)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-07-28 11:16:33 +03:00
Phil Pirozhkov
493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
Loïc Guitaut
296aad430a DEV: Use describe for methods in specs 2022-07-27 16:35:27 +02:00
David Taylor
c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Roman Rizzi
4dc8c3c409
FEATURE: Blocking is optional when deleting a user from the review queue. (#13375)
Subclasses must call #delete_user_actions inside build_actions to support user deletion. The method adds a delete user bundle, which has a delete and a delete + block option. Every subclass is responsible for implementing these actions.
2021-06-15 12:35:45 -03:00
Dan Ungureanu
197e3f24ce
FEATURE: Show stale reviewable to other clients (#13114)
The previous commits removed reviewables leading to a bad user
experience. This commit updates the status, replaces actions with a
message and greys out the reviewable.
2021-05-26 09:47:35 +10:00
Josh Soref
59097b207f
DEV: Correct typos and spelling mistakes (#12812)
Over the years we accrued many spelling mistakes in the code base. 

This PR attempts to fix spelling mistakes and typos in all areas of the code that are extremely safe to change 

- comments
- test descriptions
- other low risk areas
2021-05-21 11:43:47 +10:00
Vinoth Kannan
10449ff794
UX: return correct error message if reviewable user is deleted already. (#12977)
Currently, when the target is not available we're returning the error message "`You are not permitted to view the requested resource`" which is not clear.
2021-05-07 22:00:04 +05:30
Daniel Waterworth
2a18b0b07e
DEV: Remove debug print statement (#12390) 2021-03-12 15:12:50 -06:00
Mark VanLandingham
4adce0d844
DEV: APIs for plugin to add custom reviewable confirm modal (#12246) 2021-03-02 10:28:27 -06:00
Roman Rizzi
bb3d5e9758
FEATURE: Filter reviewables by id. (#12213)
The API now accepts an array called "ids" to select specific items. This parameter is not present on the UI.

Example usage: "yoursite.com/review.json?ids[]=1&ids[]=2"
2021-02-26 07:56:14 -03:00
Robin Ward
a20bcd34da
FIX: Approving a user was not sending an email (#11883)
When we made rejection emails optional we accidentally changed the
default for approval emails from true to false.
2021-01-28 12:41:30 -05:00
Régis Hanol
bc63232d2e
FIX: sync reviewable count when opening the hamburger menu (#10368)
When a tab is open but left unattended for a while, the red, green, and blue
pills tend to go out of sync.

So whevener we open the notifications menu, we sync up the notification count
(eg. blue and green pills) with the server.

However, the reviewable count (eg. the red pill) is not a notification and
is located in the hamburger menu. This commit adds a new route on the server
side to retrieve the reviewable count for the current user and a ping
(refreshReviewableCount) from the client side to sync the reviewable count
whenever they open the hamburger menu.

REFACTOR: I also refactored the hamburger-menu widget code to prevent repetitive uses
of "this.".

PERF: I improved the performance of the 'notify_reviewable' job by doing only 1 query
to the database to retrieve all the pending reviewables and then tallying based on the
various rights.
2020-08-07 18:13:02 +02:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek
e0d9232259
FIX: use allowlist and blocklist terminology (#10209)
This is a PR of the renaming whitelist to allowlist and blacklist to the blocklist.
2020-07-27 10:23:54 +10:00
Roman Rizzi
98eb7a3f00
FIX: Users should be able to delete their own queued posts (#10265) 2020-07-20 17:21:20 -03:00
David Taylor
461b4e5cc6
DEV: Add framework for filtered plugin registers (#9763)
* DEV: Add framework for filtered plugin registers

Plugins often need to add values to a list, and we need to filter those lists at runtime to ignore values from disabled plugins. This commit provides a re-usable way to do that, which should make it easier to add new registers in future, and also reduce repeated code.

Follow-up commits will migrate existing registers to use this new system

* DEV: Migrate user and group custom field APIs to plugin registry

This gives us a consistent system for checking plugin enabled state, so we are repeating less logic. API changes are backwards compatible
2020-05-15 14:04:38 +01:00
Jarek Radosz
781e3f5e10
DEV: Use response.parsed_body in specs (#9615)
Most of it was autofixed with rubocop-discourse 2.1.1.
2020-05-07 17:04:12 +02:00
Roman Rizzi
394babcae3
FIX: Only show the review page to users that can see it. Do not publish the reviewable count update message to everyone. (#9556) 2020-04-27 14:51:25 -03:00
Jarek Radosz
17cf300b71
DEV: Use more specific error responses (#9472)
* DEV: Use `render_json_error` (Adds specs for Admin::GroupsController)
* DEV: Use a specific error on blank category slug (Fixes a `render_json_error` warning)
* DEV: Use a specific error on reviewable claim conflict (Fixes a `render_json_error` warning)
* DEV: Use specific errors in Admin::UsersController (Fixes `render_json_error` warnings)
* FIX: PublishedPages error responses
* FIX: TopicsController error responses (There was an issue of two separate `Topic` instances for the same record. This makes sure there's only one up-to-date instance.)
2020-04-21 03:50:20 +02:00
Jeff Wong
5ccbc5f3ee
FEATURE: add after-reviewable-post-user plugin outlet (#9397)
FEATURE: add after-reviewable-post-user plugin outlet

Add a plugin outlet after reviewable post user

Add a basic user serializer that includes custom fields.
Allows review queue serializer to include custom fields for its users
2020-04-09 11:32:39 -07:00
Roman Rizzi
4cf3c9cccb
FEATURE: Filter reviewables by date range (#8354) 2019-11-15 15:29:59 -03:00
Robin Ward
bde0ef865f
FEATURE: Adds a pop up that shows a more detailed score for reviewables (#8035)
If you click a (?) icon beside the reviewable status a pop up will
appear with expanded informatio that explains how the reviewable got its
score, and how it compares to system thresholds.
2019-09-04 09:56:25 -06:00
Robin Ward
e74cd54fc6 REFACTOR: Replace score bonuses with low/med/high priorities
We removed score from the UX so it makes more sense to have sites set
priorities instead of score bonuses.
2019-05-23 11:54:45 -04:00
Robin Ward
643c75c419 FIX: Don't increment version if the reviewable operation fails
In fact, roll back the entire operation in the database.
2019-05-10 09:53:25 -04:00
Daniel Waterworth
bf7594b327 More prefabrication 2019-05-10 08:34:04 -04:00
Robin Ward
b380ed5282 FEATURE: Claim Reviewables by Topic
This is a feature that used to be present in discourse-assign but is
much easier to implement in core. It also allows a topic to be assigned
without it claiming for review and vice versa and allows it to work with
category group reviewers.
2019-05-09 13:40:36 -04:00
Daniel Waterworth
e219588142 DEV: Prefabrication (test optimization) (#7414)
* Introduced fab!, a helper that creates database state for a group

It's almost identical to let_it_be, except:

 1. It creates a new object for each test by default,
 2. You can disable it using PREFABRICATION=0
2019-05-07 13:12:20 +10:00
Sam Saffron
4ea21fa2d0 DEV: use #frozen_string_literal: true on all spec
This change both speeds up specs (less strings to allocate) and helps catch
cases where methods in Discourse are mutating inputs.

Overall we will be migrating everything to use #frozen_string_literal: true
it will take a while, but this is the first and safest move in this direction
2019-04-30 10:27:42 +10:00
Robin Ward
6f56fba016 UX: Update post actions to "Approve Post" and "Reject Post"
This should be more clear.
2019-04-23 12:19:11 -04:00
Robin Ward
14f9d40e48 FEATURE: Clarify Reviewable User Actions
"Approve" is now "Approve User" and "Delete" is a dropdown with a choice
that allows you to block.
2019-04-17 11:44:17 -04:00
Robin Ward
a5d9afe397 FEATURE: Include a user's pending posts in the topic view
Also includes a refactor to TopicView's serializer which was not
building our attributes using serializers properly.
2019-04-12 14:25:12 -04:00
Robin Ward
cbc311e4ed UX: Update the reviewable count before the message bus
In certain edge cases, the message bus won't send the message to the
user about the updated review count and it can go out of sync.

This patch synchronizes the review count every time:

1. The user visits the "Needs Review" page

2. Every time the user performs an action
2019-04-05 10:35:38 -04:00
Robin Ward
c1ea63bdc1 FIX: Reviewables should not be created for users until they are active
Conversely, if a user is deactivated the reviewable should automatically
be rejected.

Before this fix, if a user was not active they'd still show in the
review queue but without an "Approve" button which was confusing.
2019-04-03 15:25:00 -04:00
Robin Ward
62956003c3 FEATURE: Allow users to customize bonuses for reviewable types
A new settings section in the review queue allows admins to specify that
certain types of flags should be weighted higher than others.
2019-04-03 11:18:34 -04:00
Robin Ward
b58867b6e9 FEATURE: New 'Reviewable' model to make reviewable items generic
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.

Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
2019-03-28 12:45:10 -04:00